the daily wire

WaPo’s desperate spin on Bud Light’s sales plunge.

The Washington Post’s Spin on Bud Light’s Decline in Popularity

The Washington Post recently attempted to downplay Bud Light’s rapid descent in popularity, attributing it to a longer-term trend rather than its disastrous partnership with trans-identifying activist Dylan Mulvaney.

“Bud Light sales fall in U.S. as Mexico’s Modelo gains popularity,” the headline read, suggesting that the brand’s loss of popularity was due to a general decline in domestic beer sales.

Critics, however, pointed out the significant drop in sales that coincided with Bud Light’s ill-fated partnership with Mulvaney. They argued that it was hard to believe that the two were not connected.

Podcast host Tim Pool expressed his skepticism, stating, “Man, imagine being so stupid you still fall for this s***. I think regular people are finally realizing the media just lies about everything.”

“A 25% permanent drop in sales was going to happen anyway,” @ITGuy1959 added. “Wapo is indistinguishable from parody.”

Michael Seifert chimed in, saying, “Imagine believing this. If you really think that Bud Light’s drastic drop in sales is from consumers being tired of ‘domestic beer,’ I have a beachfront home to sell you in Iowa.”

Radio host Buck Sexton predicted that the Left would desperately try to convince conservatives that their successful campaign against Bud Light wasn’t effective and shouldn’t be replicated against other woke targets.

“The Left will be increasingly desperate to convince conservatives that their highly successful campaign against Bud Light wasn’t effective after all, and definitely shouldn’t be duplicated against other woke targets,” Buck Sexton tweeted.

Bud Light wasn’t the only brand facing backlash recently. Retail giant Target also experienced a multi-billion-dollar loss in market capitalization following backlash over an “LGBTQ+ PRIDE” display.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker