Every Dem Should Be Asked: What About ‘Woke 1’ Was ‘Crazy’?
This article criticizes Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s dismissive attitude toward the concept of “woke,” highlighting her remarks on ABC where she downplayed the impact of “Woke 1,” a term used by a local politician to describe extreme progressive policies. The author emphasizes the significant negative consequences associated with “woke” policies,such as a spike in crime rates,including a 30% increase in murders,and challenges Democrats to account for their past policy positions,such as abolishing ICE,defunding the police,and promoting racial-based distribution of taxpayer funds. Despite Democrats labeling certain policies as “crazy,” the article argues there is little evidence they plan to reverse their positions. The piece calls for accountability and clarity on whether these politicians still support controversial issues like transgender surgeries for minors, open borders, and vaccine mandates.it underscores the disconnect between Democrat rhetoric and their previous policy stances, suggesting they cannot simply dismiss their prior commitments with jokes or dismissive remarks.
No one who lived through the past 10 years should allow Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to giggle away the hell called “woke” that she and Democrats inflicted on this country. It can’t possibly be that easy for them to move on from what they did just because they know it’s unpopular and it complicates things for their leaders wanting to run for president in 2028.
In an interview last weekend on ABC, Ocasio-Cortez was asked about the countless naggy, bitter, and anti-American declarations now-former Democrat gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong made in public over a number of years. (My personal favorite being her 2020 magazine article in which Hong, who previously owned a ramen noodle restaurant and is obviously not white, bemoaned the food service industry’s “deep roots in white supremacy.”)
“She’s moved away from it,” said Ocasio-Cortez, matter-of-factly. Then, with a hearty chuckle, she said, “And I have a local city councilman that has this saying: ‘Woke 1 was crazy.’”
Ocasio-Cortez continued, observing that “the discussions that were had in [2020] were quite fruitful” but that “of course, rhetoric in that time is not rhetoric that we would use today.”
Of course not! “Woke 1” drove a 30 percent spike in the U.S. murder rate as well as sharp increases in virtually all other types of crime, including robbery, vandalism, and theft. AOC’s answer for that is to ask that voters at least kindly remember how “fruitful” those “defund the police” discussions were.
If Ocasio-Cortez and presumably other Democrats are ready to marginalize and move on from the policy positions and views they branded themselves with for years, they can’t be let off the hook with a wink and smile. They should be required to account for specific policies they no longer support.
If they’re no longer in favor of abolishing ICE and defunding the police, why? Does that mean they would allocate money for those agencies’ budgets? How much? Do they still believe in distributing taxpayer money based on race (reparations)? Do they still believe “racial equity” is a reason to decline prosecuting “nonviolent” crime, like drug dealing and looting? Do they continue to support elective, irreversible opposite-sex hormones for minors?
What about doctors performing mastectomies on healthy teenage girls? What about vaccine mandates? What about allowing men in women’s locker rooms and public restrooms? Can they name a single illegal alien they would be in favor of deporting? How many migrants would they allow to cross the southern border?
Democrats can call everything they did “crazy,” and yet there is no evidence they would change any of it.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
