The Whole Transgender Industry Is Founded On Two Faulty Studies

Two Dutch studies It is a testament to the immense success of “gender-affirming” Experts at the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine have deemed medical intervention with youth to be bad research. 

This report is available. “The Myth of ‘Reliable Research’ in Pediatric Gender Medicine” Researchers published earlier this month to explain how the U.S. transgender industry’s foundation studies of 2011 and 2014 should not have been accepted by the profession. “unacceptably” Modern research standards are not met. These studies led to a worldwide movement of incorrectly named people. “gender-affirming care,” This can lead to hormone experimentation on youth, and sometimes, irreversible sexual mutilation.

According to the report, several flaws were found in the Dutch studies. The report states that the study authors only analyzed the cases with the highest outcomes and concluded that gender dysphoria is not caused by hormones or puberty blocks. They also failed to adequately examine the risks associated with these interventions.

The American College of Pediatricians replied to the report in a Press release Calling all organizations on January 25 “reconsider current protocols for gender dysphoric children.”

“The entire pediatric transgender industry is based on these two Dutch studies,” Michelle Cretella is the ACPeds’ immediate past executive Director and an advisory board spokeswoman for Advocates Protecting Children. “This open access report is critical because it exposes the fraudulent foundation of pediatric transgender medicine in the United States.”

The Dutch studies were so important to the U.S. movement, Dr. Norman Spack opened the first American pediatric gender clinic. He was a pediatric endocrinologist who believed in the necessity of it. “gender-affirming” Cretella explained that Cretella visited the Dutch doctors responsible for publishing them and suggested interventions.

However, these authors concluded that if the studies were published today, they would have been deemed low-quality and not encouraged the use puberty blocking drugs, wrong-sex hormonal therapy, or surgery in confused children and young people in general medical settings.

‘No Evidence’ Genetic Cause

E. Abbruzzese and Stephen B. Levine have years of experience in studying the so-called gender identity. Since 1974, Levine has been working in this field as a psychiatrist.

Levine and his coauthors started to voice concerns about the Dutch studies in March 2022. The scientists published “Reconsidering Informed Consent for Trans-Identified Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults” to characterize the studies’ limitations. January’s report is a follow up to the original report.

“We had no bias, we are just responding to and trying to articulate the limitations of the studies,” Levine shared his knowledge with me. “We are doing harm to an unknown percentage of kids, and the data that is supportive of this work does not really address the issue. The real issue here is what happens to these children when they get into their 20s and 30s.”

The following are youth who have undergone hormonal and surgical procedures. “transitioned” They face major barriers to happiness and productivity in the future.