ACLU’s Weak Defense for Terror Support

Last week, the ‌once-proud ACLU sent a letter‍ to 650 colleges and universities ⁤defending the ⁢“rights”⁣ of student groups ⁢to provide material support for anti-Semitic⁤ genocidal‍ terror.

The ACLU’s recent actions have ⁢raised eyebrows and ⁤sparked controversy. In a surprising move, they penned ‍a letter to hundreds⁣ of educational institutions, advocating for the rights of student groups‌ to support acts of terror against the Jewish⁤ community. ‍This letter, however, was not ⁤only⁢ legally and factually incorrect, but it also displayed‍ a⁣ concerning level of negligence and laziness on the part of the⁤ organization.

A Troubling Track Record

This is not the first time‌ the ACLU has come under fire​ for its questionable stance on protecting Jews.⁣ Their track record⁢ in⁢ recent years has been less than⁢ stellar, leaving many to question their commitment to defending the rights of this ​marginalized community.

The ACLU’s‌ letter was supposedly a response to⁢ a⁢ letter⁣ sent by the Anti-Defamation‍ League and the Louis D. Brandeis⁤ Center for Human⁢ Rights Under Law. These organizations‌ urged university presidents to investigate‌ the Students ⁤for‍ Justice in Palestine (SJP)‍ chapters on their campuses, suspecting ⁢them ‍of providing material support to‍ designated terrorist groups. However, the ACLU​ claimed ⁢to be‍ unaware⁤ of any evidence supporting ​these claims, conveniently ignoring the actions taken by Florida ⁤Governor Ron DeSantis to defund SJP for the same ⁢reasons.

Unmasking SJP

SJP, a ​radical activist organization, ⁣has long been associated with blatant anti-Semitism. While there was previously no ⁤concrete evidence of their material support for terrorist organizations, recent events have shed light on their true intentions.

Following the horrific atrocities committed ⁢in Israel, SJP chapters across the country organized a ‘National‍ Day ⁣of Resistance’ in support ⁣of Hamas, a designated terrorist ‍organization responsible for the massacre of innocent ⁣Jews. SJP’s alignment with Hamas and their commitment to the worldwide genocide of Jewry is ‍clearly outlined in Hamas’ charter. In ‌preparation for their ‘Day of Resistance,’ SJP released a toolkit, providing law enforcement with undeniable proof of their criminal ⁢activities.

The⁢ ACLU’s Oversight

While ⁢the ACLU acknowledges that ‍the toolkit endorsed the mass‌ murder of civilians, they ⁢conveniently⁣ omit ​crucial details. The toolkit not only contained public relations⁢ and ⁤persuasion materials but also included direct quotes from terrorist ‍leaders themselves. The ACLU, ⁣despite having access to this toolkit, chose to⁣ turn‍ a blind eye to its contents.

The Legal Perspective

Under 18 U.S.C. §2339B, providing⁤ material support to⁤ a⁣ foreign terrorist​ organization is ⁣a federal crime. The Supreme Court’s ruling in⁣ Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project established ​that even certain ​forms of speech⁢ can be considered material support if done⁢ in coordination with known terrorist organizations. Courts⁣ have consistently upheld‍ this interpretation, making it clear that SJP’s actions would⁤ indeed qualify as material support.

Despite this ⁢legal⁤ precedent, the ACLU conveniently ⁢ignores the connection between SJP and Hamas. They ⁣argue that without evidence of ‌coordination and direction from Hamas, SJP’s ‍advocacy is⁢ protected by ⁣the First⁣ Amendment. However, numerous courts have ⁢ruled that the government does not need to establish a direct connection, as long ⁢as⁢ there is evidence of an‌ attempt to provide material ⁢support.

The ACLU’s Selective Ignorance

It is evident that‍ the ACLU deliberately overlooks crucial facts and legal precedents. Their claim ​of ignorance‍ is simply not credible, as ⁣even a ​first-year ​law student⁤ could have easily found the missing link between SJP and Hamas. ⁤The ACLU’s​ refusal to​ acknowledge this⁤ connection raises serious doubts about their integrity and motives.

A Question of Fairness

Interestingly, Palestine Legal,​ the law group representing SJP, also ‌sent a letter⁣ decrying Governor DeSantis’ actions. However, unlike the ACLU, they do not deny SJP’s guilt. Instead, they ​argue that the laws ‌criminalizing material support for terrorism⁢ are unfair. While this argument may⁢ have some merit, it does not excuse the⁢ ACLU’s blatant disregard for the truth.

When ​faced with a lack of facts and legal standing, ​the ACLU resorts to baseless accusations and​ cries of ‌unfairness. However, they cannot‌ simply distort the law to fit their narrative.

The Consequences ‌of Lazy ​Obfuscation

The ACLU’s ⁣letter not only displays a lack⁤ of ​factual accuracy but‍ also perpetuates‍ a dangerous conflation ⁣of the Israel-Hamas conflict with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Supporting anti-Semitic‍ genocidal terror​ under the guise of‌ being pro-Palestinian is not only misguided but also morally reprehensible. ⁣This kind of lazy obfuscation provides ‍cover for groups like SJP ‍to ⁤commit heinous acts of anti-Semitism‍ while⁤ claiming to be advocating for Palestinian rights.

While free speech ⁢on campus is important, there are‌ limits to what is protected. School administrations and law enforcement⁢ must remain vigilant in enforcing these limits. If the‍ ACLU cannot provide​ accurate information ⁣or ‍support the​ laws that protect marginalized communities, perhaps it ​is better for them to remain silent than⁢ to perpetuate‌ ignorance.

*⁣ * *

Dr. Mark Goldfeder, Esq. is the CEO and Director of​ the National Jewish Advocacy Center, ​Inc.

The views ⁤expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent ‌those of The ⁣Daily Wire.

⁢Does the ACLU’s decision ⁤to defend SJP’s actions despite overwhelming evidence of ⁣their​ support for terrorism indicate a selective​ approach to their advocacy and a lack of commitment to defending the ⁣rights of all?

Year law student could have ‍easily found the evidence and legal arguments against SJP.⁤ The ACLU’s decision to​ defend SJP’s actions, despite overwhelming evidence of their support for terrorism, raises troubling questions about their motives and⁣ priorities. Is⁤ the ACLU truly committed to defending the rights of‌ all, or⁢ are they‍ selective in their advocacy?

The Impact ⁢on Jewish Students

By defending ⁣the rights of student groups to support terrorism against the Jewish community, the ACLU‌ sends a chilling message to Jewish students across the country. It undermines their sense ‌of ⁤safety and​ security, ‍allowing anti-Semitic groups like SJP to ⁤operate with⁤ impunity. Jewish students have ‍a right to feel protected and supported on college ‌campuses, and‌ the ACLU’s actions severely⁣ undermine⁣ that right.

The Call for Accountability

It is ⁢time for the ACLU to be held accountable ⁤for its reckless and misguided actions. Advocating for the rights⁣ of student groups to support⁤ terrorism is not only legally and morally wrong but also‍ goes against the⁢ principles the ACLU​ claims⁤ to uphold. The organization must reflect on its​ track record⁢ and​ address the concerns raised‌ by the Jewish community and their allies.

The ACLU’s letter defending the⁤ “rights”⁣ of student groups to provide material ‌support for anti-Semitic genocidal ‌terror cannot be justified. It⁢ is​ a betrayal of their mission and a dangerous precedent to set. The ⁢organization‍ must reevaluate its ​priorities and ensure that its actions align with the principles of justice and equality for all.