Texas Governor Greg Abbott Working ‘Swiftly’ To Pardon Daniel Perry After Soros Prosecution

After being found guilty in a self-defense way, Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced on Saturday that he was working to have Daniel Perry pardoned.

A judge in Texas found Perry guilty of murder on Friday after he shot and killed a soldier who was carrying an AK-47 in 2020 while participating in the Black Lives Matter demonstration. Perry was not found guilty of the charge of aggravated assault by the judge.

After the event, Perry was not previously charged with any crimes, but District Attorney Jose Garza decided to bring charges against Perry in 2021. George Soros, a billionaire Democrat megadonor, supported the campaign of most city attorneys, including Garza.

A judge or a progressive district attorney may invalidate Texas’ one of the strongest” Stand Your Ground” norms of self-defense, according to Abbott. The Texas Constitution restricts the Governor’s’s forgive responsibility to just acting on a proposal by the Board of Pardons and Paroles, unlike the President or some other state.

Abbott continued,” Texas law DOES permit the Governor to ask the Board of Pardons and Paroles to decide whether or not a person may feel pardoned.” ” I have made that plea and given the Board the go-ahead to discuss it quickly.” As soon as the Board’s’s proposal for pardon arrives at my desk, I look forward to approving it. However, I’ve’ve already made it a priority to control rogue district attorneys, and Texas’ government is developing legislation to do just that.

Abbott made the decision to pursue” rogue District Attorneys” after Florida Governor Ron DeSantis dispatched law enforcement to remove the state’s’s woke Soros prosecutor— the first time a governor has done so.

Regarding Sgt. ‘ s pardon, I am moving as quickly as Texas law permits. Perry. film. twitter.com / HydwdzneMU

Greg Abbott(@ GregAbbott_ TX) April 8, 2023

The case’s’s principal studying detective, David Fugitt, claimed in a 2021 petition that Garza behaved” criminally” in the case.

GET THE DAILYWIRE + APP BY CLICKING HERE

Regarding the demonstration of circumstantial evidence pertaining to Daniel Perry, Fugitt said,” I had many discussions with the District Attorney’s’s Office.” ” It became apparent to me that the District Attorney’s’s Office did not want to present Daniel Perry with evidence that would exonerate him before the grand jury.”

The Travis County Attorney’s’s Office” ordered me to remove exculpatory information that I had intended to present to the grand jury during my testimony on more than one occasion ,” he claimed. ” Of my original 158 drop powerpoint presentation, the demonstration was shortened to 56 slides, and nearly all of the circumstantial evidence was ordered to be removed.” I felt as though I had no choice but to follow their instructions.

According to Fugitt, Garza’s’s order prohibiting the display of circumstantial evidence during the way” went ] from highly unethical behavior to legal conduct.”