Ohio’s GOP Governor vetoes bans on gender procedures for minors and biological boys participating in girls’ sports
Ohio Governor Vetoes Legislation Banning Transgender Procedures on Minors and Transgender Athletes in Girls’ Sports
Governor Mike DeWine (R-OH) made a controversial move on Friday by vetoing legislation that aimed to ban gender procedures for minors and prevent boys who identify as girls from competing in girls’ sports. The bill, known as Ohio House Bill 68, was passed by the Republican-controlled Ohio General Assembly and consisted of two acts: the “Save Adolescents from Experimentation Act” and the ”Save Women’s Sports Act.”
HB 68 received majority support along party lines, with the Ohio House voting 62-27 and the Ohio Senate voting 24-8 in favor of the legislation. However, Governor DeWine expressed concerns about the legal implications of signing the bill into law, leading him to issue a veto.
Administrative Rules as a Better Solution
“I truly believe that we can address a number of goals in House Bill 68 by administrative rules that will have likely a better chance of surviving judicial review and being adopted,” DeWine said at a press conference.
The vetoed bill not only aimed to ban transgender procedures on minors but also sought to prevent biological boys from participating in girls’ sports across the state. Senate President Matt Huffman argued that the legislation was necessary to protect children from potentially harmful treatments.
Republican Supermajority Hold
DeWine’s veto now faces the same fate as previous Republican governors who vetoed similar bans. Republican supermajorities in the Ohio legislature will have to come up with a three-fifths majority to override the governor’s veto.
Currently, twenty-two states have either restricted or banned transgender procedures on minors in recent years due to increasing evidence of negative health implications and stories of regret from detransitioners.
DeWine’s Consideration for Children and Families
DeWine visited hospitals and spoke with families who had experienced both positive and negative outcomes from transgender procedures. He emphasized the importance of getting it right when dealing with children and families going through challenging times.
It remains to be seen whether the Ohio legislature will be able to override Governor DeWine’s veto and enact the controversial legislation.
Leif Le Mahieu contributed to this report.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
What concerns did Governor DeWine express about the provisions in the bill that aimed to address transgender procedures on minors and transgender athletes in girls’ sports?
N
Governor DeWine believes that the issue of transgender procedures on minors and transgender athletes in girls’ sports should be addressed through administrative rules rather than legislation. In a statement, he explained that he supports the goal of protecting minors from unnecessary procedures and ensuring fair competition in girls’ sports. However, he expressed concerns about the provisions in the bill that could lead to unintended consequences and potential litigation. The “Save Adolescents from Experimentation Act” aimed to prohibit doctors from performing gender-affirming procedures, such as hormone therapy and surgeries, on minors. Supporters of the bill argue that these procedures can have long-term physical and psychological effects on minors, and that they should be reserved for adults who can make informed decisions. However, opponents argue that transgender individuals should have access to these procedures as a matter of their own bodily autonomy and mental well-being. The “Save Women’s Sports Act” sought to ensure fair competition in girls’ sports by preventing boys who identify as girls from participating. Supporters of the bill assert that allowing transgender girls to compete against cisgender girls can create an unfair advantage due to physiological differences. On the other hand, opponents argue that transgender girls should be allowed to compete according to their gender identity to promote inclusivity and equality. By vetoing the bill, Governor DeWine has opened up the opportunity for further discussion and deliberation on the issue. He emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach that involves input from medical professionals, educators, and affected stakeholders. The governor believes that formulating administrative rules, in consultation with experts, is the best way to address the complex issues surrounding transgender procedures on minors and transgender athletes in girls’ sports. While the veto has received criticism from conservative groups who supported the bill, it has been welcomed by advocates for LGBTQ+ rights. They argue that legislation like HB 68 discriminates against transgender individuals and perpetuates harmful stereotypes and stigmas. It is now up to the Ohio General Assembly to decide whether to override Governor DeWine’s veto. The bill initially received strong support among Republicans, but it remains to be seen whether they can rally enough votes to override the governor’s decision. Ohio is not the first state to face contentious debates regarding transgender procedures on minors and transgender athletes in girls’ sports. Several other states, including Arkansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee, have passed legislation banning gender-affirming procedures on minors, while some states, such as California and New Jersey, have implemented policies allowing transgender individuals to compete according to their gender identity. The issue of transgender rights continues to be a subject of intense debate and polarization in the United States. It raises questions about individual freedoms, parental rights, and the role of government in regulating medical procedures and sports. As the issue unfolds in Ohio and across the nation, it is crucial to foster respectful dialogue and consider the perspectives and well-being of all individuals involved. In conclusion, Governor Mike DeWine’s veto of Ohio House Bill 68 has sparked controversy and initiated a necessary discussion about transgender procedures on minors and transgender athletes in girls’ sports. While the bill aimed to protect minors and ensure fair competition, the governor believes that administrative rules provide a better solution. The issue remains divisive, but it is essential to approach it with empathy, respect, and a commitment to finding the best path forward for all individuals involved.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Auto Amazon Links: Could not resolve the given unit type, . Please be sure to update the auto-insert definition if you have deleted the unit.