Ohio’s bill prohibiting transgender surgeries for minors is now on the governor’s desk

The Ohio‌ Senate Passes Legislation to ⁢Protect Children ​from Transgender ⁣Surgeries and Ban Males from ​Women’s Sports

The ‍Ohio Senate made a⁢ significant move on Wednesday by passing legislation aimed at safeguarding children from transgender⁤ surgeries and⁢ preventing males from competing in women’s sports. The bill has now been sent to Republican Governor Mike DeWine for approval.

The Senate approved the bill with an impressive 24-8 vote, with ⁤nearly all‍ Republicans supporting⁣ the measure. If signed into law, the bill would prohibit surgeries like double ‍mastectomies for⁢ girls identifying as⁤ boys and other genital procedures for children with gender dysphoria. It would also ban the prescription of​ puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for minors, except for those already on the​ medication. This is crucial as these treatments have ‍been linked to various health risks, including bone development issues, fertility problems, and heart complications.

Senate President ‍Matt Huffman emphasized the necessity of this legislation in protecting children‍ from potentially harmful treatments. He stated, “Certainly the parents are the most important decision-maker in a child’s life. But there are things where it’s ​important ​for the state to step in and protect ⁣the child.”

The bill also includes provisions to protect parents who oppose their child ⁣undergoing a‍ “transition” or⁢ receiving transgender⁤ procedures.‍ Republican Representative Gary Click⁣ played a significant⁣ role in sponsoring the bill.

Morgan Keller, a “detransitioner,” who testified in favor of ​the legislation before Ohio lawmakers, expressed her support for the bill’s passage. She said, “Children everywhere deserve to grow​ up with their bodies and endocrine systems intact. The passing of [the legislation] ‌ is a significant step in fighting against an ideology that says otherwise.”

While Governor DeWine has not yet indicated whether he will sign the bill, he has previously criticized ‌a similar bill that aimed to ban males from participating in women’s sports. However, even if he were to veto the legislation, Republicans hold a supermajority in ⁢both the House and Senate, making it likely that they could ⁣override the veto.

It is worth noting that over 20 ‌other states have already enacted laws ⁤to protect children from irreversible⁤ transgender surgeries and procedures.

Click here ⁣to get the DailyWire+ app!

What ⁤factors should Governor Mike DeWine‍ consider when deciding whether to sign the legislation into law

D hormone treatments for children‌ under the age of eighteen.

This legislation is seen as a significant step in protecting the well-being and long-term health of children who may be experiencing gender⁢ dysphoria. Proponents argue that irreversible surgeries and⁣ hormone treatments carry inherent risks and may not align‌ with the child’s best interest. The bill​ aims to ensure that children have ⁤the opportunity⁢ to explore their ‍gender identity in a safe and supportive⁤ environment without making permanent decisions at a young age that they may later regret.

Additionally, the bill addresses another contentious issue in the realm of sports –⁢ the inclusion of biological males in women’s ‌sports. Supporters of the legislation argue that allowing male athletes to participate in women’s sports creates an unfair advantage due to biological differences, such as muscle mass and testosterone levels. They claim that such inclusion can ⁤diminish the opportunities for female athletes and ​undermine the integrity of women’s sports.

Opponents of the bill ⁢argue that it discriminates against transgender individuals and ⁣limits⁤ their‌ right to medical treatment and sports participation. They ​argue that gender-affirming surgeries and hormone treatments are essential for individuals with gender dysphoria, and banning them would harm these individuals’​ mental and physical well-being. Additionally, opponents suggest that a⁤ blanket ban on transgender individuals in women’s sports is ‍discriminatory and disregards the inclusivity and diversity that should be promoted in athletic competitions.

The bill has generated heated debates and divided opinions ​among lawmakers⁢ and the public alike. Proponents of the legislation argue that it is crucial to protect the rights and well-being of children, while opponents believe it‌ infringes upon the rights of transgender individuals. Nevertheless, ‌the Ohio Senate’s‍ decision ⁤to pass the legislation highlights the ongoing national⁣ conversation surrounding transgender rights and the​ challenges of balancing inclusivity ​with fair play in ​athletics.

It is now ⁣up to Governor‍ Mike DeWine to decide whether to sign the bill into law. This decision holds significant weight, as it will not only impact transgender ‍individuals and children with gender dysphoria in Ohio but could also set⁣ a ​precedent for ⁢similar legislation in other states. The governor will need to carefully consider the arguments presented by both sides and weigh the potential consequences before making‍ his decision.

Regardless of the outcome, the Ohio Senate’s passage of this legislation‌ has sparked a meaningful​ dialogue⁣ on the rights of transgender individuals, the importance of‌ protecting children, and the fairness of athletic competition. It serves as a reminder that these complex issues require thoughtful​ consideration, compassion, and a ⁣commitment to‌ finding a balance that respects the rights and well-being of all individuals involved.