Motherhood Is Completely At Odds With Career-Obsessed Society

The passage reflects on the tension between early motherhood and high-demand professional work, drawing from the author’s experiences as a supervisor. It begins with a woman’s blunt observation that building a career can conflict with being a new mother-especially when job expectations include long hours and travel right after childbirth. Through this encounter, the author feels (as a male manager) that he finally heard the issue clearly expressed, and he also recognizes that many mothers experience motherhood and careerism as tough-perhaps incompatible-realities.

The author describes broader workplace cases that illustrate how hard it is indeed to accommodate pregnant and nursing employees. These include a mother repeatedly struggling to find space during work hours to pump breast milk when no dedicated nursing room exists, and coworkers resenting schedule disruptions. Another example involves a pregnant hire being expected to maintain long hours and travel even as her due date nears, creating the sense that pregnancy is treated less as something to support and more as an inconvenience.

A central story returns to the woman mentioned at the start. After maternity leave, she and her manager discuss expectations, and she expresses that the job forces her into a choice between her child and her work. She ultimately frames her responsibility as one she must answer for to God, emphasizing the moral weight-and perceived non-negotiability-of her role as a mother.

The writer critiques the growing industry of advice books that promote “baby-proofing” careers or finding ways to “make motherhood work,” arguing that no strategy can fully resolve the fundamental fact that babies require their mothers for years, not just weeks.The passage also suggests that attempts to define freedom as escaping nature and dependence are misguided, drawing on a philosopher’s argument that real freedom often means returning to what cannot be escaped-nature and faith.

While the author acknowledges the importance of dads’ involvement and feels the strain when he travels, he argues that the need for mothers is especially acute in early childhood due to biological and relational bonding needs. The text concludes that this is not a question of women’s professional competence, but of what the author portrays as the uniquely human importance of early motherhood: the career can wait, but the baby cannot.


“This whole career thing is really at odds with being a new mother,” a woman said in the privacy of my office. New to my team, she had just returned from maternity leave after her first child and was juggling first-time motherhood and a new, demanding career that pushed her to work long hours and take long business trips away from her newborn. I knew she was right, but it was the first time in many years of management that I had heard it stated so succinctly and powerfully.

What I experienced that day was illuminating for both of us. For me as a male professional, it justified what I had so often thought when having other conversations with female coworkers navigating pregnancies and motherhood. For her as a young female professional, it was obvious that she felt a burden lifted and could admit what so many other female professionals seek so desperately to resist, deny, or control — namely, that modern careerism and motherhood are in deep, perhaps irreconcilable tension.

A Sympathetic Supervisor’s Constant Quandary

I’ve been in various supervisory positions for almost the entirety of my marriage. When we first married, my wife had her own career. But not long after the arrival of our first child, she traded that job for life as a stay-at-home mom. I wasn’t sure how I felt about that — playing the role of breadwinner was a lot for a twenty-something guy to contemplate, and in the back of my mind, I hoped my wife would, in time, reenter the workforce. Now that we have a litter of kids, her homeschooling and motherly duties far outpace the stress levels I could manage … and I work two jobs, usually clocking in about 70 hours per week!

Over those years, I’ve supervised a good number of women who are either pregnant or caring for a newborn. Because I know what it’s like to help a wife with a newborn, I’ve gotten a reputation as someone who is sympathetic to mothers’ experiences. And, as someone who is pro-family and pro-life, I try to foster a work environment that accommodates the needs of pregnant women and nursing mothers. But, admittedly, it’s never an easy fit.

I remember one woman under my supervision who, after her first child, was regularly trying to find a place to breast-pump. There was no nursing mother’s room, so she would try to find an empty conference room. Multiple times, other coworkers would interrupt her and apologetically explain that they needed the room for their meeting. I would advocate for her, but it was obvious coworkers bristled at adjusting their schedules to accommodate her pumping schedule.

Another time, I was asked to take on a new employee who had gotten pregnant (seemingly to the frustration of her management). She had been expected to do some long hours and even some extended travel, but as her due date approached, that was obviously impossible. What she interpreted (perhaps correctly) was that the baby in the womb was perceived not as something to be celebrated, but as an inconvenience to be managed.

When the Light Clicks for New Mothers

And, finally, there was the new mother I mentioned above. When she returned from maternity leave, we sat down to discuss job expectations. I told her I would do everything I could to shield her from long hours or travel, but it would be impossible to indefinitely postpone the inevitable. “They’re making me choose between my baby and this job,” she said, frustrated. Then she declared: “I’m going to be answerable to God for this child.”

I don’t think you necessarily need to be religious to appreciate her comment. The value of a child is so infinitely beyond the value of a job, and — despite her multiple degrees from prestigious programs — she perceived the unavoidable tension every mother avoids, denies, or tries to address with the latest “hack.” Indeed, there is a massive cottage industry of literature devoted to navigating motherhood and careerism.

There’s book-length advice on how to “baby proof your career,” how to “make motherhood work” with your career, how to “thrive” while being a working mother, and leveraging “prioritization” and “delegation” to be a “savvy working mom.” Regardless of how sophisticated that advice might be, it all confronts the inevitable fact that babies need their moms. And not just for weeks or a few months. They need them for years.

As political philosopher Harvey Mansfield argues in his new book The Rise and Fall of Rational Control, true freedom is not defined solely by achieving rational control over ourselves and nature via the latest “life hack,” but by fleeing “back into the arms of God and nature.” Mansfield explains: “Perhaps the original mistake was to define an opposition between freedom and nature, which tried to compel us to escape what cannot be escaped.” That seems an apt description for women’s attempts to juggle parenthood and high-octane professions.

Careerism Is a Joy-Suck For Everyone, But It’s More Than That for Moms

No doubt, my role as a dad is essential to the well-being of my children. They need me, and they need me to be integrally involved in their lives, right from the beginning. Every time I take a business trip I feel the tension not only of leaving my tired and overwhelmed wife, but of missing out on being a daily source of love and stability for those children. I know they need their dad.

But for young children, the need for mom is amplified multiple times. Some of this is simple biology — babies need to be nursed. As female subordinates have told me, breast-pumping at work is soul-crushing, because it undermines mother-baby bonding. But that mother-baby relationship is also social and interpersonal — there’s mounds of anecdotal and research-based evidence that kids whose mothers are deeply invested in their early development do better across a host of categories.

That’s why, as much as I am happy to support working mothers and expectant mothers, there is a profound, inescapable conflict between their careers and their kids. They should be home with them, not navigating nursing mothers’ rooms, breast pumps, and debilitatingly expensive day care where strangers raise their kids.

This has nothing to do with the feminine ability to be a competent professional. But it has everything to do with what makes us most human. Being a new mother isn’t something to be technocratically managed, but to be honored for the beautiful, ennobling, and soul-enhancing experience it is. The career can wait. Your baby can’t.


Jack Danielson (a pen name) has almost 15 years of managerial experience in a variety of jobs in the United States and abroad. His writing had been featured in many publications. The Federalist verifies the identities of its pseudonymous authors.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker