Massachusetts Dem Argues It Costs Too Much Money to Let Disabled People Be Born

Michael Hugo, the chair of the Framingham Democratic Committee, argued in a city council meeting that crisis pregnancy centers are a danger to the community because their screening might not catch a birth defect, the result of which would be the live birth of an expensive-to-care-for disabled child.

You should make sure they are killed before they cause a financial impact..

Hugo is not only the chair of Democrats in the Massachusetts town of Plymouth, but also the director of government affairs and policy for the Massachusetts Association of Health Boards.

It’s nice to know. You should be aware that the medical boards are pushing the government to get rid of the disabled if they are going to provide medical care.

Disability groups are calling for his resignation. If they succeed in convincing him to quit his position as party leader or his job as policy director, he could always move to Canada, where the government has a policy of killing unwanted and costly people.

Massachusetts Democrats are calling for the resignation of a local official after they complained about the high costs of special education for children with disabilities.

Michael Hugo, chair of Framingham Democratic Committee made these remarks at a meeting of city council to discuss a proclamation regarding access to abortion and crisis pregnancy centres in the city. He claimed that crisis pregnancy centers can misdiagnose a defect within a baby’s womb and lead to them being born, putting pressure on school budgets. After enduring backlash from his own party members and parents of special-needs children, he issued a public apology.

As you can see, misdiagnosis can be both positive and negative. Planned parenthood is so eager to kill off babies, that they have been known as to recommend abortions for perfectly healthy babies. However, killing babies is nothing major so it’s best to be certain.

Hugo has issued the mandatory non-apology apology. This assures the community that Hugo meant no offense. Hugo just wanted to make sure everybody understood that letting babies live can be expensive and could have negative ROI.

It’s good to be informed.

Hugo apologized publicly for his comments and called them “sinister” “offensive and hurtful.”

“I am writing to offer my most sincere and humble apology to members of the Framingham Democratic Committee, but more especially my fellow members of Framingham’s disability family community, for comments that I made at the last City Council meeting which were offensive and hurtful,” He wrote.

He claimed that the members of this committee did not agree. “see or review” His comments were received the night before the meeting, even though they had been sent to him.

“Our fear is that if an unqualified sonographer misdiagnoses a heart defect, an organ defect, spina bifida or an encephalopathic defect that becomes a very local issue because our school budget will have to absorb the cost of a child in special education, supplying lots and lots of special services to children, who were born with the defect,” Hugo stated this at the February 7, 2007 meeting.

Fox News interviewed Laura Green, Framingham’s disability advocate. She said that she doesn’t accept his apology.

“I feel that it was generic and lackluster. I feel like after a statement like that is made, you can’t just pretend that it didn’t happen or take it back because it’s damaging to a community of people,” She said. “The disability community is the only minority group that you can become a part of at any time.”

Notice how the entire Democrat committee was sent his remarks prior to he made them. He claimed that no one had actually read them. This is plausible, as Democrats are like that. They likely just skimmed the documents to make sure he was for killing children. It doesn’t matter which ones are killed, so long as there are enough.

This is what happens when you lose the belief that all human beings were created in God’s image and are uniquely valuable. The belief that one’s worth as a human being depends on being innocent leads to the murder of innocent people. “wanted.”

It is hard to believe that Hugo doesn’t accept the fact that human beings don’t have any soul or inherent value once you accept this.

Hugo isn’t a bad person. It would be comforting. He’s probably a normal, rational man who believes that babies must justify their existence by providing good ROI. This is not a defect in the soul, but an ideology that leads to the evil conclusion.

I believe so.