Washington Examiner

Juror removed from Trump trial due to impartiality concerns

The mentioned content introduces the third day of⁤ the New York hush money trial​ involving ‍former President ‌Donald Trump. A⁤ juror was dismissed due to concerns over impartiality. The text prompts readers⁢ to click “Read‌ more…” for additional details and features hyperlinks to ⁢the Washington Examiner for⁣ further information. The provided ⁣content outlines the third day of the New York hush money trial ​concerning former ​President Donald Trump. A juror’s ⁢impartiality concerns led to her dismissal. The text ‍encourages readers to click⁢ “Read ‍more…” ‍to access further details and ‍includes hyperlinks to⁤ the Washington ⁤Examiner for more information.


The third day of the New York hush money trial against former President Donald Trump kicked off on Thursday with the dismissal of a juror who raised personal concerns about her ability to be fair and impartial.

The woman, who was listed as the second juror out of a group of seven chosen on Tuesday, said she had concerns about her ability to be fair and impartial, adding that she was afraid and intimidated by the press. She also noted her friends, family, and colleagues questioned her identity as a juror.

Juror No 2 is gone. She said she was afraid and intimidated by the press and that her friends, family, and colleagues questioned her identity as a juror.

After dismissing her, Merchan addressed the media—saying it was unnecessary to report on jurors’ appearances and accents.

— Molly Crane-Newman (@molcranenewman) April 18, 2024

With the dismissal of the second juror, the total number of seated jurors goes back down to six. An additional six are needed, along with six alternates, before opening statements can begin.

After her dismissal, Justice Juan Merchan addressed the media, saying it was unnecessary for the media to report on jurors’ accents and appearances, according to a New York Daily Mail reporter.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Problems with impartiality have been a pertinent concern for the former president, who on Wednesday railed about the process of jury selection moving too quickly and raised concerns about the limited number of strikes he has to dismiss a juror if his defense counsel feels they are impartial.

This is a developing story and will be updated.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker