John Fetterman Opens Up About Phone Call to Erika Kirk, Rips Into Her Critics: ‘What’s Wrong With People?’
After an assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, reports said Pennsylvania Sen.John Fetterman personally reached out to erika Kirk (wife of charlie Kirk, who was killed in september 2025) to make sure she was okay.
In comments to Fox News, Fetterman said he apologized, noting that Erika was understandably “frantic” after her husband’s assassination and describing the call as a “very personal” interaction. He added that he was heartbroken by the fact that she had to endure further political violence less than a year after Charlie’s death, and he criticized people who attacked her online.
The interview also touched on other political topics-such as Fetterman’s views on President Donald Trump’s position on Iran and the idea that China should pressure Tehran-but the most prominent remarks where those about his call with erika Kirk.
In the cutthroat world of hyperpartisan American politics, it’s rare to see much warmth emanate across the ideological aisles.
So many observers were somewhat surprised that after the White House Correspondents’ Dinner assassination attempt, reports surfaced that Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. John Fetterman had personally reached out and called Erika Kirk to make sure she was okay after the April incident.
(For the somehow unaware, Erika’s husband, Charlie Kirk, was assassinated by a shooter in September 2025.)
“The Charlie Kirk Show” executive producer Andrew Kolvet said that Fetterman was “pretty emotional” on the call with Erika, but didn’t offer too many other details.
And until now, little was publicly known about what was actually said during that call.
Fox News spoke to Fetterman about that call in a piece published Thursday, and the outspoken lawmaker offered a bit more insight into what happened.
“I expressed how sorry I am,” Fetterman said. “She was frantic, understandably, after her husband was assassinated.”
He added, “How triggering that must have been for her.”
Fetterman would go on to call the phone conversation a “very personal human interaction,” and said his “heart breaks” for Kirk after she had to live through more political violence less than a year following Charlie’s murder.
Fetterman’s more biting words were reserved for the people who saw fit to attack Kirk about her situation.
When asked about those online attacks against Kirk, Fetterman said, “It blows. People attack a widow. I mean what’s wrong with people? That’s bonkers.”
Fetterman also spoke to Fox News on myriad other topics, including the lawmaker’s support for President Donald Trump’s war in Iran, and even going so far as to suggest that China should help pressure Tehran, even if it hurts a bit economically.
“I think China should feel that pain,” Fetterman told the outlet. “I think that’s entirely appropriate. Why can’t China demand that?”
“Why not? Unless they want to create Iran as a nuclear power, and that would be incredibly dangerous for the whole world peace.”
Still, it was Fetterman’s comments about Erika Kirk — not Iran or China — that struck the most personal note during the interview.
In fact, when Kolvet was revealing the earliest details about the call, he was doing so alongside Glenn Beck. And the two men had nothing but praise for the Democrat, despite the lack of details at the time.
Beck d the video clip on X, which you can watch for yourself below:
.@AndrewKolvet tells me @JohnFetterman reached out to @MrsErikaKirk and apologized after the White House Correspondents’ Dinner Shooting:
“He was pretty emotional, and he just apologized for whatever he could. He didn’t need to… It was after everything happened. An emotional… pic.twitter.com/FP6Q1HSsPP
— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) April 28, 2026
Beck said he personally reached out to Fetterman to commend him for speaking up.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."



