A Group of Parents Sue California Officials for Religious Discrimination in Homeschool Program
A group of parents in California has filed a lawsuit against the state’s superintendent of schools and local officials, alleging religious discrimination. The parents claim they were banned from using faith-based curriculum in a publicly-funded homeschool charter program.
The law firm First Liberty is representing five parents who participated in public charter schools offering an at-home “independent study” program. This program allows parents to choose their own curriculum and educational materials using funds provided by the school.
The complaint states that the parents, John and Breanna Woolard, Hector and Diana Gonzales, and Carrie Dodson, were denied the option to select faith-based curriculum by their respective schools. The Dodson family was even expelled from their charter school due to this issue.
The families argue that the schools never explicitly stated in program materials that religious-based curriculum was prohibited.
The complaint states, “Even if the work sample meets all … the basic requirements, however, the work sample is deemed ‘acceptable’ only if it is ‘nonsectarian (non-religious)’. Again, the handbook does not set forth any other restrictions on the ideological content of work samples.”
The parents claim that the schools’ actions violate their First Amendment rights to free speech and free exercise of religion.
Justin Butterfield, the attorney representing the families, said, “Our clients simply want to be able to choose curricula that fits their families’ needs without facing religious discrimination. These families love their charter schools and the opportunities those schools provide for families to educate their children in a way that fits the families’ needs.”
A kindergarten student does schoolwork at her home in a file photo in San Anselmo, Calif., on March 18, 2020. (Ezra Shaw/Getty Images)
The schools involved in the lawsuit are Blue Ridge Academy in Southern California and Visions of Education in Northern California. The lawsuit names officials from both schools, their respective districts, and California’s Superintendent of Public Schools Tony Thurmond as defendants.
According to the complaint, the Woolards were denied the use of religious works by Jonathan Edwards and William Penn as supplemental materials for their daughters’ study of colonial America. Blue Ridge cited a state law prohibiting the teaching of “sectarian and denominational doctrine” as the reason for the denial.
The Woolards and the Gonzales family were also told by Blue Ridge that they couldn’t use a multi-subject curriculum from Bob Jones University due to its “worldview-shaping” and “religious aspects,” despite the curriculum’s academic quality being acknowledged by their teacher.
Meanwhile, Carrie Dodson chose to use ”The Good and the Beautiful” curriculum for her son under Visions of Education’s independent study program. However, Visions officials refused to approve the curriculum and accept work samples from it because of its religious content.
The plaintiffs are seeking a court order to reverse the schools’ policy banning faith-based curriculum and to prevent school officials from enforcing the policy. They are also requesting that the defendants cover their legal fees.
A spokesperson for Visions of Education stated that the school is committed to following the California Constitution and state education regulations. They believe that these issues should be debated and discussed in courts and legislatures.
Blue Ridge Academy has not yet provided a comment on the matter.
What are the main arguments presented by the parents suing for religious discrimination in the homeschool program?
00px” class=”media”>
Parents suing for religious discrimination in homeschool program. Source: exampleimage.com
The lawsuit seeks to prohibit California from denying parents the option to select faith-based curriculum in publicly-funded charter homeschool programs. The parents are also requesting that the court declare the schools’ policies unconstitutional and award damages for their emotional distress.
This case highlights the ongoing tension between religious freedom and the regulation of homeschooling programs. While parents have the right to choose the type of education their children receive, states also have an interest in ensuring that publicly-funded programs are inclusive and do not promote any particular religious ideology.
This is not the first time that homeschooling programs have faced legal challenges related to religious discrimination. In 2020, a similar lawsuit was filed in Michigan, alleging that the state’s policies violated the First Amendment rights of parents who wanted to use faith-based curriculum in publicly-funded homeschool programs.
The outcome of these cases will have implications not only for homeschooling families but also for the broader debate surrounding the role of religion in public education. Supporters of the parents argue that allowing them to use faith-based curriculum in homeschool programs is a matter of religious freedom and parental rights. Critics, however, are concerned that allowing religious instruction in publicly-funded programs undermines the secular nature of public education and may lead to the exclusion of certain religious or non-religious groups.
As the lawsuit moves forward, it will be important to consider the balance between protecting religious freedom and ensuring that publicly-funded programs are inclusive and respectful of all families’ beliefs. This case raises important questions about the boundaries of religious expression in education and the extent to which the state can regulate homeschooling programs.
The outcome of this lawsuit may have far-reaching implications for homeschooling families in California and across the country. It will be an important test of the courts’ interpretation of the First Amendment and their willingness to uphold religious freedom in the context of publicly-funded education programs.
Regardless of the outcome, this case serves as a reminder of the complex and evolving nature of the relationship between religion and education in the United States. As homeschooling continues to grow in popularity, it is likely that similar legal challenges will arise in the future, further shaping the landscape of education and religious freedom in America.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
