Dr. Eric Berg claims YouTube is censoring his health videos.
Prominent Health Influencer Expresses Concerns Over YouTube’s Algorithm Changes
Dr. Eric Berg, a well-known health influencer with 11 million subscribers, has voiced his worries about YouTube’s recent decision to alter its algorithms. These changes specifically target health-related content that does not align with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) general medical consensus.
In a video posted on YouTube on Sept. 13, Dr. Berg expressed his concerns, stating, “YouTube has just now banned anything related to health that doesn’t align with the general medical consensus.”
Dr. Berg, who graduated with a Doctor of Chiropractic degree in 1988, is recognized for sharing alternative health perspectives. He no longer practices chiropractic medicine and focuses on creating educational videos full-time.
Related Stories
- ‘Call of Duty’ Video Game Using AI to Monitor What Players Say, Censor ‘Toxic Speech’ – 9/8/2023
- Judge Rejects RFK Jr’s Request for Order Blocking Google From Censoring Him – 8/24/2023
Dr. Berg believes that YouTube’s policy shift will have negative consequences. He argues that freedom of health information is equivalent to freedom of speech and that this change sets a dangerous precedent.
‘My Information Is Not Dangerous’
In his video, Dr. Berg explains that YouTube’s new partnership with the WHO aims to protect against misinformation and promote high-quality health information. However, he criticizes the platform for defining misinformation as anything that opposes their viewpoint.
Dr. Berg defends his content as non-toxic and helpful, emphasizing that the change will hinder individuals searching for alternative health solutions. He believes that diverse perspectives and opinions are crucial in the healthcare field, fostering competition and better outcomes.
One of Dr. Berg’s main concerns is the lack of transparency regarding YouTube’s partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and medical institutions. He questions whether these relationships influence the platform’s definition of misinformation, potentially suppressing dissenting viewpoints.
He asserts, “My information is not dangerous, it’s not misinformation. It’s actually quite helpful, and this new change is going to hurt a lot of people because they’re not going to be able to find alternative viewpoints, alternative opinions.”
Combating Keto ‘Misinformation’
Dr. Berg also highlights how YouTube’s search algorithm changes have affected the discoverability of his content. Despite having numerous videos on the ketogenic diet, he claims that his content has been overshadowed by mainstream medical sources like the Mayo Clinic.
He criticizes the Mayo Clinic’s video for misrepresenting the ketogenic diet and perpetuating misconceptions. Dr. Berg emphasizes the health benefits of “mild ketosis” and challenges the clinic’s characterization of ketone bodies as toxic.
According to Dr. Berg, the Mayo Clinic’s focus on weight loss overlooks the numerous other health benefits associated with the ketogenic diet. He encourages viewers to participate in a survey to share their opinions on YouTube’s algorithm changes and their impact on health information accessibility.
The Epoch Times reached out to Google, YouTube’s parent company, and the Mayo Clinic for comment.
How can YouTube strike a balance between promoting accurate information and allowing for diverse viewpoints in its content moderation approach
Cizes this move, stating, “It’s not about protecting against misinformation, it’s about censoring alternative viewpoints.” Dr. Berg firmly believes that his information is not dangerous but rather provides an alternative perspective that can be beneficial to individuals seeking different approaches to their health.
Dr. Berg is not the only health influencer to voice concerns about YouTube’s algorithm changes. Many others in the alternative health community have expressed their apprehensions, arguing that this move restricts freedom of speech and limits access to diverse health perspectives. They believe that individuals should have the right to explore different viewpoints and make informed decisions about their own health.
YouTube’s decision to align its algorithms with the WHO’s general medical consensus is not without reason. The WHO is a reputable international organization that provides expert guidance on global health matters. Aligning with the WHO can help ensure that users of the platform receive accurate and reliable health information.
However, the concern lies in the potential for bias. Critics argue that by only promoting content that aligns with a single consensus, YouTube is limiting the diversity of information available and potentially suppressing valuable viewpoints. This raises questions about the role of social media platforms in curating content and the responsibility they have towards providing a balanced and comprehensive range of information.
The controversy surrounding YouTube’s algorithm changes is part of a wider conversation on the role of technology platforms in controlling information flow. This issue extends beyond the realm of health-related content and speaks to concerns about censorship and the power these platforms wield over what content users can access.
Dr. Berg and other health influencers are advocating for a more transparent approach to content moderation. They argue that instead of outright banning certain viewpoints, platforms like YouTube should prioritize providing accurate information and clearly labeling different perspectives. This would allow users to make informed decisions and exercise their critical thinking skills.
In response to the concerns raised by Dr. Berg and others, YouTube should engage in open dialogue with health influencers to address the issue at hand. Collaborating with experts from diverse health backgrounds can lead to a more nuanced and balanced approach to content moderation. It is crucial that platforms like YouTube actively seek feedback from their users and adapt their policies to promote a healthy and informed online environment.
As the discussions around YouTube’s algorithm changes continue, it is essential to strike a balance between providing accurate information and allowing for diverse perspectives. Freedom of speech and access to information are fundamental rights that should be upheld, even in the digital age. A transparent and inclusive approach to content moderation is key in ensuring that users have access to a wide range of health information and can make informed decisions about their well-being.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
