New subway ‘chokehold’ court filing reveals disturbing details, warranting dismissal of Daniel Penny case.

Harrowing Details⁣ in New⁤ Subway ‘Chokehold’ Court⁣ Filing Should ‍Get Daniel Penny Case Thrown Out

If any indictment ever demanded dismissal, this one does.

The case against Marine Corps ⁣veteran Daniel Penny, facing⁢ charges of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in New ⁤York City, came under new light in a defense motion brief reported by Fox​ News on ​Tuesday.

And the details‌ should have the‌ case thrown out of ​the courtroom.

Penny is charged ​in the ⁤May 1 death of​ Jordan Neely, ⁢a 30-year-old with ⁣a documented history of mental ⁣illness and violent crime.

The ⁤incident took place aboard a subway car in⁤ Manhattan, a closed environment where​ riders were at the mercy of a ⁤man⁣ openly menacing women and children.

And‌ as grand jury testimony⁤ cited in the brief makes clear ​— testimony that ⁤paints a picture of the atmosphere on ​the F train that day — those riders were terrified.

Witnesses Describe the Terrifying Scene

• One woman described⁤ cowering with her son behind the⁣ boy’s baby stroller as Neely was⁢ making‌ “half-lunge” movements toward riders, according to the brief.
• A high school⁣ girl said she heard Neely say “someone is going to⁤ die today,” and she began to⁤ pray the subway‍ doors would open so‍ she could ​escape.
• Another rider, a retired woman who’d taken the subway for decades, described how ⁣frightening it‌ was:

“I have been ‌riding the subway for many years,” she ⁤said, according to the brief. “I ​have encountered ​many things, but nothing that ​put fear ‍into me like that.”

And⁢ Penny took action.

Penny’s Heroic Intervention

“I remember, like, looking to my right, seeing the mom cover⁤ her kid, and then looking left, and in like the snap of a finger I saw Mr. Penny ‌come up behind, put his hand‍ on Mr. Neely, and then they were both‍ down on the ground,” a grand jury witness ⁤testified, according to the ​brief.

Even in the dry legal papers, the relief⁤ in those words ⁤is almost palpable — a deliverance from evil appearing on the scene as Penny placed ‍Neely in a chokehold and, with the assistance of two other men, ended the threat to ⁣the rest of the passengers.

In a normal ​place and in normal times, Penny would be applauded.⁢ No ⁣one has accused⁣ him of deliberately killing Neely. He ​ wasn’t even arrested immediately after being⁢ questioned by police.

But this⁢ was in ​Manhattan,‍ where leftist ‌District Attorney Alvin Bragg reigns supreme — a prosecutor who ⁤finds ​time to go after former ⁢President Donald ⁣Trump on ludicrous financial matters (and win ​liberal media acclaim) ​but no ⁤time to ‌tackle the‍ actual crime ⁤ running​ rampant in his streets.

And in a ⁣case where he can inject race into the justice‍ system ‍— Penny is white, Neely was⁣ black — ⁣Bragg doesn’t hold​ back. Given a chance to bring the power of the legal​ system ⁤against a white man — a‌ Marine Corps veteran with an⁢ honorable discharge who felt‌ an ‌obligation to protect the powerless — he operated true to form.

The brief filed by ⁣Penny’s‍ defense⁤ attorneys is ⁣seeking dismissal of the case on grounds that testimony by medical examiner Cynthia Harris‌ might have misled grand jurors as to the cause⁤ of Neely’s death.

There’s no real dispute that⁤ Penny’s chokehold resulted in⁤ Neely’s⁢ death, but the fact ⁣that Neely died an hour⁣ after ​the ride ended, according to the brief, tends‍ to show‍ that Penny never intended to end‌ the man’s life.

More to the point, the grand jury testimony showed that people who ‍were⁢ there, locked in⁤ a rocking subway ‍car ‍with‌ a madman raging in their faces, ⁣were damn glad Penny was on the scene.

It’s practically a legal axiom that even a half-witted prosecutor can “indict ⁣a ham sandwich,” but as the legal brief notes,​ the New York‍ Supreme‌ Court ‌has declared that “the prosecutor is ​charged with duty not only to secure indictments, but also to see ‍that justice is done.”

American common ⁤sense agrees. ‍No one is saying Jordan Neely deserved to die. Certainly, Daniel Penny has never said that, nor does any evidence show‌ that he intended it.

But ‌when⁢ a clearly deranged‌ man, without⁤ fear of ⁣prison or ‍the law, ⁣is threatening the innocent,‌ something needs to be done, and someone needs to take action.

Penny did that — for ⁢which his fellow riders were grateful, and the rest of the country should‍ be, too.

Neely’s death ⁢is on his own ‍head, and whatever “justice” ⁢is for him is now ‍well beyond human hands.

But if ever an indictment against a criminal defendant needed to ⁣be dismissed,​ it’s‍ this one.

Justice demands ⁤it.

The post Harrowing Details in New Subway ‘Chokehold’ Court Filing Should Get Daniel Penny​ Case Thrown ⁢Out appeared first on The Western Journal.

What do witness testimonies reveal about the chaotic and fear-filled environment on‌ the subway car? How did Daniel Penny heroically intervene in this situation?

E and‌ again that his⁢ loyalty lies with the criminals rather than the‍ victims or the public. In this case, his office decided to charge Penny with manslaughter and ‍criminally negligent homicide, despite ‌the fact that he was simply defending himself⁤ and others from a dangerous and violent individual.

The defense motion brief reveals harrowing details that not only support Penny’s actions but also expose the negligence of ‌the subway authorities and the district attorney’s office. The witnesses’ testimonies paint a vivid ⁢picture of the terrifying scene that unfolded on the subway car that day. Women and children were hiding⁣ behind strollers, praying for their lives, as Neely⁤ made threatening ⁤movements towards riders.

It is in this chaotic and​ fear-filled‌ environment that Penny intervened heroically. Witness testimonies describe how he swiftly and courageously subdued Neely, putting him‍ in a chokehold and ensuring the safety of everyone present. The palpable relief expressed in the grand jury witness’s words speaks volumes about the imminent danger that ‍was diffused by Penny’s actions.

In any rational⁣ and just society, Penny would be commended for his bravery and ⁤selflessness. However, in Manhattan under Alvin‌ Bragg’s jurisdiction, the situation took a different turn. Despite ⁣no evidence of malicious intent on Penny’s part and his prompt cooperation with the police, he was arrested and charged with manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide.

This raises serious questions about the priorities of the district attorney’s office. Instead of focusing on the true culprits⁢ and addressing the systemic ⁣failures that ‍allowed a mentally ill ‍and violent individual to terrorize⁢ innocent⁢ subway passengers, Bragg chose to target and vilify a Marine Corps veteran ​who risked his life to protect others.

The defense‌ motion calls for the dismissal of the case, and it is hard ⁢to argue‌ against it. The evidence presented in the brief leaves no room for doubt that Penny acted in the defense of ⁣himself and others. The prosecution’s decision to charge him with serious‍ offenses is not only unjust‌ but also a waste of ⁣valuable resources that could be better allocated to pursuing real criminals and ensuring the safety of the public.

If ‍justice is to prevail, District Attorney Alvin Bragg must reconsider his misguided prosecution of Daniel Penny. The ‌harrowing details presented in the defense motion⁤ prove that Penny should be recognized as a hero, not a criminal. ⁤It​ is time for the court to dismiss this ‌baseless case and focus on pursuing true ⁢justice for​ the victims of crime⁣ in New York City.