Female athletes challenge Connecticut’s transgender sports policy in court.

Federal Appeals Court to Consider Legal Challenge Over Transgender Girls’ Participation in School Sports

A closely watched and yearslong legal challenge over transgender girls’ participation in female school sports competitions is set to be considered by a federal appeals court in New York. The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit will review a decade-old Connecticut policy that allows high school students to compete on teams that correspond with their gender identity, even if it differs from the sex on their birth certificate. The suit was filed three years ago by four female high school track-and-field athletes in the state.

“For this particular hearing today, we will be making the case that girls’ athletic records and our accomplishments matter, not just in high school, but for their college prospects and even for future employment prospects as well,” said Christiana Kiefer, senior counsel of Alliance Defending Freedom.

Claims and Counterclaims

The female athletes’ claims that the policy makes it harder for girls to win in their sports if they are forced to compete against athletes with the physical advantages of male athletes. They say the rule directly conflicts with Title IX, the federal law barring sex discrimination in education. Defenders of the Connecticut policy say that striking down the policy would itself constitute a form of discrimination by blocking transgender athletes from participating on the all-female team. Groups including the American Civil Liberties Union have vowed to defend the rule.

• The court previously held the plaintiffs’ claims as “speculative.”
• The district court held out on a ruling for 14 months before it was dismissed at that level.
• Attorneys for the Connecticut Association of Schools and other defendants argue the policy is legal and that plaintiff athletes have no valid basis for challenging it.

A decision is expected in the coming months.

Alanna Smith, one of the students who filed the lawsuit, said in a statement that she hoped the 2nd Circuit would “realize how important this issue is and they will restore fairness to women’s sports.”

Christiana Kiefer said she didn’t expect the appeals court to reach the full merits of the case, adding that would “hopefully” come later because her group is “hopeful that the 2nd Circuit will allow the lawsuit to move forward so that we are able to make our full case.”

ESG EMERGES AS SLEEPER ISSUE IN THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN

Source: Washington Examiner