Defending the Crusades without apology.
The True History of the Crusades
Fewer moments in history are as misunderstood and revised as the Crusades. This series of violent clashes between Christian and Muslim cultures spanning three continents and nearly a millennium has been characterized as a futile war of aggression. In the telling of most modern historians, belligerent, greedy, and racist Christians in Western Europe were periodically guided by a bloodthirsty theocrat in Rome to channel their savage energies toward embattling a rival faith in the delusional belief that this would guarantee their admittance into Heaven, if not an earthly kingdom to rule over. What resulted was hardly more than pointless slaughter on both sides.
But nearly all of this is false. The Crusades were wars of defense, with Christians attempting to drive out foreign Muslim invaders in lands that were formerly Christian. Far from being unenlightened savages, the Crusaders were a highly organized force that pushed the boundaries of what was possible in warfare, government, and religious practice. The great personal sacrifice of the Crusaders, along with moral arguments against the use of violence, disprove the idea that they did this for personal gain.
Unfortunately, few historians will risk professional ruin by challenging the prevailing narrative of the academy and telling the true history of the Crusades. However, to his great credit, Raymond Ibrahim dismisses such concerns and offers riveting profiles of eight great heroes of the Crusades in his newest book, Defenders of the West: The Christian Heroes Who Stood Against Islam.
The War for the Holy Land
As an Arabic linguist and expert in Islamic history and theology, Ibrahim is able to tap into primary sources from both sides of the conflict to give a more objective, unbiased account of the Crusades. More importantly, he makes a point of prioritizing the reader and telling a story. In his introduction, he fully agrees with Carlyle’s thesis that history is “but the biography of great men.” Whereas most modern historians tend to attribute developments in the past to impersonal forces (what is known as “historicism”), Ibrahim recognizes and celebrates the accomplishments of heroic individuals and the effect they have on the world. By doing this, he shows that these men were not only important for their time, but can still serve as models for people today.
Although Ibrahim organizes his chapters chronologically, his biographies work better as a framework for three different regional conflicts: the war for the Holy Land and Byzantium, the Reconquista of the Spanish peninsula, and the Balkan defense against the Ottoman Turks. As Ibrahim relates, each war had its own share of successes and failures for the West, but so much of this depended on the leadership and how unified the Christian kingdoms were. When the leaders were strong and unity existed, they would have long-term victories (as in Spain); when the leaders were strong, but unity didn’t exist, they would have only short-term victories (as in the Holy Land and Balkans).
The war for the Holy Land and Byzantium presents the best overall view of the Crusades. While the first Crusaders recaptured many of the kingdoms along the Eastern Mediterranean, Crusaders in the following centuries devoted most of their resources to securing those kingdoms and establishing outposts to facilitate supply lines. Finally, these kingdoms and outposts were eventually lost, as Western leaders lost interest in crusading.
In the first group was Godfrey of Bullion, a noble who was “strong beyond compare, with solidly built limbs and stalwart chest,” according to William of Tyre. Moreover, he was extremely religious, often praying and fasting before battles. Both qualities proved necessary as Godfrey encountered a completely different kind of enemy, one that had few qualms about murdering and torturing innocents and using terror tactics to intimidate their opponents. Despite this, Godfrey and the other Crusaders managed to retake Antioch and other fortresses as they marched toward Jerusalem.
At that point, they were exhausted, starving, and dying of thirst. Added to this was news of Muslim atrocities where Christian men were massacred and women and children were brutally ravished and sold into slavery. These tactics effectively prevented sympathizers from helping the Crusaders who were forced to depend on their feckless Byzantine allies and fragile supply lines stretching back many miles. Eventually, Godfrey ordered the construction of a siege tower and scaled the walls of Jerusalem. What resulted from the prolonged frustration and ongoing atrocities was the famously bloody massacre of everyone in the city: “the carnage was so horrific that, once the battle frenzy had subsided, ‘even the victors experienced sensations of horror and loathing.” Sadly, showing mercy just wasn’t a luxury for Crusaders if they hoped to be successful.
Nowhere was this lesson better demonstrated than in the two kings who tried to build on Godfrey’s first victories a century later, Richard the Lionheart of England and Louis IX of France. Displaying amazing toughness and intelligence, King Richard lived up to the moniker of Lionheart. In battle after battle, Richard recovered and reinforced the Crusader kingdoms along the coast and conquered Cyprus, which was then ruled by a Byzantine rebel, Isaac Comnenus.
Most of Richard’s success could be attributed to a realistic approach to warfare, understanding the dynamics of negotiation and leverage and outmaneuvering the famed (and exceptionally duplicitous) Saladin: “Richard … marched some twenty-six hundred Muslim captives outside in full view of Saladin and ordered their execution.” If actions like these weren’t taken, Richard would have quickly succumbed to enemy forces or retreated early like his old friend King Philip-Auguste of France.
In contrast to Richard’s accomplishments, King Louis IX (St. Louis) was a “tragic hero” of the Crusades, showing amazing promise and having the best intentions, only to experience continual setbacks during his campaign in North Africa. Unlike Richard, a giant of a man who commanded authority through example and shrewdness, Louis was more sickly and saintly. Although he enjoyed respect from his people and his peers, he struggled to hold them back at critical junctures of the fighting, which led to a number of ambushes inflicting heavy losses. There were also bouts of plague since the enemy poisoned wells and clogged the river with rotting corpses — he had the bad luck of fighting the Mamluk (“slave-soldier”) leader Baibars, an even more vicious and duplicitous ruler than Saladin.
Finally, Louis himself was taken captive, but he bravely endured taunts and torture before he was ransomed. In the end, Louis died of sickness in his second Crusade, and with him died the crusading movement. Meanwhile, Muslim invaders recaptured what was won by the Crusaders and inflicted egregious persecutions against the Christian population.
The Victors: The Heroes of the Reconquista and Balkan Crusades
Discover the incredible stories of the Spanish Crusaders who fought against all odds to retake their land from the occupying Moors. From El Cid to King Ferdinand III, their superior leadership and prowess on the battlefield were key factors in their success. But it wasn’t just their military might that led to victory – their unity and understanding of the futility of allowing an enemy religion to live among its people played a crucial role.
The Balkan Crusaders: Holding off the Ottoman Turks
Meet the heroes who faced even more impossible odds than their predecessors – the Balkan Crusaders who held off the Ottoman Turks from the late 14th century to the late 15th century. Despite the general indifference of Western Europe, Hungarian King John Hunyadi launched a guerrilla campaign against the gargantuan armies of Sultan Murad. George Kastrioti and Vlad Dracula III, both former captives of the Turks, turned their small numbers into a strength by picking apart large, poorly organized Turkish armies. Their success proved that even the smallest force can make a difference.
A Worse Alternative
Some readers may find the graphic descriptions and lack of sympathy for Muslim civilizations in Defenders of the West off-putting. However, these details provide important context that helps to explain the extreme measures taken by the Crusaders. As ugly as they often were, the alternative of surrender and submission would have been far uglier. Author Raymond Ibrahim proves that the Crusades were not only necessary but ultimately moral and justified.
About the Author
Explore Fascinating Topics with The Federalist
Are you looking for a source of engaging and thought-provoking content? Look no further than The Federalist! Our website covers a wide range of topics, from politics and culture to history and beyond.
Discover New Perspectives
With articles on everything from St. Louis to the Crusades to Vlad Dracula, we offer a unique perspective on the world around us. Our writers are experts in their fields, and they bring a fresh and insightful take to every topic they cover.
Easy Navigation
Our website is easy to navigate, with a user-friendly interface that makes it simple to find the content you’re looking for. Use our handy tags to filter articles by topic, or browse our archives to discover new and interesting pieces.
Join the Conversation
At The Federalist, we believe that the best ideas come from a lively and respectful exchange of opinions. That’s why we encourage our readers to join the conversation by leaving comments and engaging with our writers and other readers.
So what are you waiting for? Start exploring The Federalist today and discover a world of fascinating topics and perspectives!
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
