Wisconsin Dems Misgender Bulls To Begin Dairy Month
The piece argues that the Wisconsin Democratic Party promoted National Dairy Month with an image showing two bulls, which the author claims is a basic livestock error because bulls don’t produce milk. It describes how the post was deleted after backlash and used by Republicans and critics as evidence of the party being “out of touch,” especially with rural farmers.
The article connects the incident to broader disputes over gender-related language and policies in Wisconsin, citing examples such as “pregnant persons” and “inseminated persons” terminology attributed to Democratic-aligned leaders, and arguing that the party’s focus on progressive policies has alienated rural residents. It highlights past controversy involving Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers and calls for voters to reject Democrats in the upcoming election.
Here’s another painful reminder to never follow the leftists who smugly told us to “follow the science”: The Democratic Party of Wisconsin can’t seem to tell a cow from a bull.
That’s not only embarrassing in America’s Dairyland, such confusion during milking could prove fatal.
In a now-deleted social media post, the party welcomed National Dairy Month with an image of wispy white clouds, blues skies, and two beefy bulls. As others in my beloved purple home state have helpfully pointed out, you can’t milk a bull. And, again, pity the fool who tries.
The Democrat Party of Wisconsin kicked off National Dairy Month by posting a graphic featuring two bulls—prompting a statewide reminder that bulls don’t produce milk.
The resulting internet dunking was predictable. The symbolism was almost too perfect.https://t.co/yNYwm0KvpE pic.twitter.com/MTPTux26jw
— The Heartland Post (@HeartlandPostWI) June 2, 2026
Actually, the mistake is quite fitting for a pronoun-happy party that likes to refer to moms as “inseminated persons” and pretend dudes can birth babies. But this is taking Pride Month a bit too far.
“Wisconsin Dems are so out-of-touch that they actually tweeted a pic of bulls for dairy month. I mean, it’s also pride month, so I guess they were gender-confused about the cattle too,” my old pal and former state Republican lawmaker Adam Jarchow posted on the Wisconsin Democrats’ lactose intolerant correction.
We regret that our Dairy Month tweet contained an error. We have “taken care” of the issue, if you catch our drift. pic.twitter.com/QdcZOKPjuy
— Wisconsin Democrats (@WisDems) June 1, 2026
“I regret to inform @WisDems that you cannot milk a bull,” Rep. Tom Tiffany, a Republican who serves Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District and is running for governor of the Dairyland, wrote on X. “But considering they think men can get pregnant, I guess thinking you can milk a bull tracks too.”
Tiffany, to be sure, has some expertise on the subject. He grew up milking cows — never bulls — on his Wisconsin family farm. But then again, as the genius Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson might say, not everyone is a biologist.
I regret to inform @WisDems that you cannot milk a bull.
But considering they think men can get pregnant, I guess thinking you can milk a bull tracks too. https://t.co/B1vvaCWyjX
— Tom Tiffany (@TomTiffanyWI) June 1, 2026
The cow kerfuffle should come as no surprise. Wisconsin’s Dem political machine isn’t much acquainted with your average family farmer, nor all that interested. The Democratic Party of Wisconsin, in fact, has had a great deal of success in statewide elections over the better part of the last decade by ignoring the interests of rural Wisconsinites and focusing almost exclusively on the woke and whipped “progressives” populating the state’s population centers, Milwaukee and Madison.
And in that bubbled universe, unlike down on the farm, girls will be boys and boys will be girls. It’s a mixed up, muddled, shook up world. As the good folks at The Heartland Post noted, “this is the same political party whose leaders have spent years insisting that biological sex is little more than a social construct and pushing policies that allow men to compete in women’s sports.”
It’s the same party that brought Wisconsin pasty, white progressive Tony Evers, the state’s two-term governor created in the liberal lab of public school bureaucracy.
And Evers brought to the party Clearinghouse Rule 25-004 , which redefines, among other gender-specific terms, “pregnant women” as “pregnant persons” in a forced administrative rule. The language swap trades “Pregnant woman” for “pregnant member(s).”
Evers’ proposed state budget last year demanded portions of Wisconsin statute refer to mothers as “inseminated persons” or “parent who gave birth to the child.” Removed from the budget by majority Republicans in the legislature, the proposal made Wisconsin the butt of a litany of jokes.
Dads suffered a similar fate under the rule. The term “father” was replaced with “other parent.”
— Tom Tiffany (@TomTiffanyWI) June 2, 2026
After Evers announced he wouldn’t seek a third term as governor, I predicted the leftist would go out with a socialist bang. I’m still laying bets on Evers establishing a “Gender-Affirming Care” wing at the State Capitol, with “Testicle Tuesday” (20% off orchiectomies) and 24/7 unisex high school showers, upon departing.
Wisconsin has a chance to kick this kind of crazy to the curb come November (Sadly, the liberals running to replace Evers are left of the Castro brothers.). Normal, sane Wisconsinites have endured a lot over the last seven-plus years of executive branch leftism.
Perhaps America’s Dairyland has finally had enough of the Democrats’ B.S.
Matt Kittle is a senior elections correspondent for The Federalist. An award-winning investigative reporter and 30-year veteran of print, broadcast, and online journalism, Kittle previously served as the executive director of Empower Wisconsin.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."



