The Mainstream Entertainment Industry’s Collapse: No Tragedy.

Democracy and Rapid Social ‌Change

In democracies, ⁣people often expect to​ have a ‌say in the⁢ decisions that ⁣can‍ have a ​lasting‌ impact on their‌ lives. However, the ‍reality⁢ is‍ quite different. Throughout history, ⁢significant ‌changes have ⁢occurred⁤ without any referendums or elections. This has become even more apparent in recent​ generations with ⁤the ​rise of modern ​technology, particularly the Internet.

Technological advancements have‍ the power‍ to transform lives on a massive scale. Just‍ a few decades ago, watching a movie meant going to a theater, interacting with others, ⁤and experiencing it in a specific location.⁢ But now, ​with ⁤the click of a button or a​ voice command, we can ⁣watch movies ⁤from the comfort of our own homes. ​This rapid ⁤change‌ has become the norm, and we often take⁤ it for⁣ granted.

While we have⁣ grown ⁣accustomed to this kind of‌ social change, what ⁣happens‍ when these ⁤conveniences suddenly ⁤disappear? This is⁣ no longer ⁤a hypothetical question.⁣ The recent strike ⁣by screenwriters and actors in Hollywood has⁣ effectively shut ​down the‌ entertainment industry ⁤in the United States. This‌ strike affects movies, television shows,​ video ⁣games,‌ and ⁤more. It is an unprecedented​ event in‌ our ‌online‍ world of streaming services and gaming ​platforms.

The Impact on Journalists and Corporate Media

For journalists‍ in corporate media, who spend countless hours glued ⁢to screens, this ⁢strike ⁢is‌ an extinction-level event. It is a catastrophe of ⁤monumental⁢ proportions. These‌ journalists, who‍ often overlook significant events, are now fixated on the Hollywood strike. ‌The Associated ‍Press⁤ even ⁤published ⁢a headline that ⁤emphasizes the severity​ of the situation:

‌ ‌ “Hollywood plunges into all-out‌ war ‌on the heels ‍of pandemic and a streaming revolution.”

This​ headline, along with⁣ the coverage on CBS’s‌ “Face the Nation,” highlights ⁣the gravity of the ⁢Hollywood shutdown. Barry ​Diller, ⁤the ‍former CEO of ⁢Paramount,⁣ was ​invited to discuss ​the consequences of ​the ongoing strikes. According ‌to Diller, if‌ the⁢ strike is not ⁤resolved by ‌Christmas, there will⁢ be‍ a severe ⁤shortage of ⁤programs for people to ‍watch.

But should we be ⁤trembling⁢ in⁤ fear⁢ at the thought of losing our beloved ⁤programs? Is it‌ really a ‌bad​ thing if we ⁢spend less time staring at screens​ and more time engaging with ⁢the real world? Barry Diller assumes that‍ we would agree with him, but ⁣perhaps it’s time‌ to question the constant consumption of ⁤content ​and consider‌ other meaningful pursuits.

The​ Decline of ​Hollywood and ‌the Excuse of COVID

While ‍Hollywood executives ‌desperately ‌try​ to ‍maintain our ‌subscription-based content ⁢consumption, recent data points suggest a decline‍ in interest. Big-budget‍ films⁤ like “The Flash,” ‌”Mission‌ Impossible,” and “Indiana‍ Jones”​ have failed to ⁣meet expectations at the box office. People⁤ are growing weary‌ of‌ the content Hollywood produces.

Instead⁣ of ‌addressing ‍this⁤ issue ​honestly, ⁣corporate media⁣ is⁣ quick to blame ⁢the decline on COVID. They argue that the pandemic’s‌ impact on movie theaters and ‌production ⁤is the​ primary reason for ⁢the industry’s struggles. However, this explanation fails⁣ to ⁢consider the⁢ success⁤ of films⁣ like‌ “Sound of Freedom”‌ and “Nefarious,” which ​have reached large⁢ audiences‍ despite limited budgets​ and minimal marketing.

The truth ‍is, people are still interested in⁣ films,​ but they have ‍grown ⁤tired ​of the ⁢mainstream Hollywood formula. Redundant⁢ storylines, woke propaganda, and a lack of‌ originality have ‍left audiences⁣ feeling disillusioned.‍ The ‍collapse of ‌the mainstream entertainment industry may be seen‍ as⁢ a tragedy by panicked executives and journalists, but it is ‌a necessary step towards ⁢creating an industry that produces content people genuinely ‍want to watch.

CLICK​ HERE TO ‍GET THE DAILY WIRE ⁢APP



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker