Watch: Letitia James Goes Silent for 10 Seconds When Asked Simple Debate Question – Then Opponent Drives Home the Dagger

The article reports on a debate between New York Attorney General Letitia James and her Republican challenger, Saritha Komatireddy. James faced multiple awkward moments, including a failed attempt to identify a past NY attorney general she admires, amid controversy over her past references and connections to previous officeholders like Eliot Spitzer, Andrew Cuomo, and Eric Schneiderman-all of whom faced scandals.

Komatireddy responded with a clear and respectful answer, citing Dennis Vacco as her admired former attorney general. The debate also touched on issues of law enforcement conduct, with James accused of operating politically rather than lawfully, and of pre-judging cases, notably regarding allegations involving prediction markets and a university rape case. Critics argue James’s methods resemble authoritarian tactics, citing her promises to pursue former President Trump and her involvement in ongoing legal investigations, which some see as politically motivated.

Throughout the discussion, James’s approach and ethics were criticized, with opponents emphasizing her political bias and questioning her suitability for the role. The debate underscored ongoing tensions about accountability,law enforcement integrity,and political motivations within New York’s legal landscape.




New York Attorney General Letitia James suffered a decisive defeat Thursday night in a debate against Republican challenger Saritha Komatireddy.

There were multiple embarrassing moments for the incumbent, including when a moderator asked, “Name a past New York attorney general that you admire.”

There was about a 10-second awkward pause while James contemplated the question, prompting Komatireddy to chime in, “She only admires herself.”

“No, no, no, we admire others,” James replied.

What “we” is she talking about? The royal we?

Finally, she answered, “I admire all of the past attorneys general because it’s a difficult job and you’ve got to stand up.”

That’s the best she could come up with?

It’s understandable why she might not want to name the last three elected officeholders to the position: Eliot Spitzer, Andrew Cuomo, and Eric Schneiderman.

Spitzer was caught up in an alleged prostitution scandal as governor, Cuomo resigned as governor following an investigation into sexual harassment allegations, and Schneiderman stepped down as attorney general after being accused of physical abuse against women.

So she admires them, too?

By contrast, Komatireddy had a ready answer. “Dennis Vacco,” she said, referring to the last Republican to serve as a New York attorney general.

“At a time when New York State needed it, we had another former federal prosecutor become attorney general and bring law and order,” the candidate argued.

But that was not the only troublesome moment for James.

At another point during the debate, when the topic was alleged misconduct involving prediction markets, “Komatireddy said she would examine the facts and the law to determine whether an investigation or prosecution was warranted,” according to Townhall.

But James pronounced, “You don’t have to look at the facts and the law. All you have to do is study what they do. It’s illegal in the state of New York.”

Komatireddy fired back, “There you go. You don’t have to look at the facts and the law, gentlemen. Your attorney general.”

Her prosecutorial method sounds like something right out of Soviet police chief Lavrentiy Beria’s playbook. He reputedly said to Joseph Stalin, “Show me the man, and I’ll show you the crime.”

In other words, he could find a crime for any political opponent of the regime.

That is, in fact, what James promised when she ran for attorney general in 2018, saying she was going to take down Donald Trump, whom she described as “this illegitimate president,” without offering any laws he had broken. She was going to find the crime.

As attorney general, James began an investigation into Trump during his first term, which culminated in civil fraud charges being brought in 2022 after he left office and was preparing to run for a second term.

In a non-jury trial, New York Judge Arthur Engoron ruled that Trump and other defendants misrepresented the worth of the Trump Organization properties and imposed $450 million in fines. An appeals court later completely voided the financial judgment in a win for Trump.

Just last week, James did not directly respond when a reporter asked about the appropriateness of her being assigned as special prosecutor in the Cornell University case involving rape allegations from 2024.

The reporter pointed to a social media post in which James wrote just days before, “What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable. I’m holding her in my heart and in my prayers. To her, and to all survivors: you’re not alone. We stand with you.”

“Why did you affirm her allegations as fact without doing your own fact-finding investigation?” he asked.

James responded, “I will not comment on a post.”

She should, because it happens to reveal her frame of mind going into the investigation.

Komatireddy summarized James’ tenure correctly when she said during Thursday’s debate, “New Yorkers, you do not have an attorney general right now. For the last eight years, you’ve had a political hack sitting in the chair, using our taxpayer money for her political purposes.”

And it’s time for her to go.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.






" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker