Ben Shapiro expertly educates Oxford students in Israeli-Palestinian debate.
Ben Shapiro Exposes Oxford Students’ True Intentions in Israeli-Palestinian Debate
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro recently engaged in a debate with Oxford University students, where he uncovered their hidden agenda as they defended Palestinians.
Snippets of the debates were posted on X.
In one exchange, Shapiro challenged a student to identify which parts of Israel she believed were occupied by the Jewish state.
“All of Israel,” she responded.
“There we go. So, what you’re really advocating for is the complete annihilation of the state of Israel, and all your arguments are just a facade for that. Thank you for your time,” Shapiro retorted.
Student after student after student openly calling for the obliteration of the state of Israel at @benshapiro’s Oxford Union event. https://t.co/qE4k1k26Ff
— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) November 3, 2023
Shapiro posed the same question to another student.
“The entirety of Palestine, but I’m not advocating for the destruction of Jews,” the second student replied.
“Thank you, once again,” Shapiro acknowledged.
This was a pretty epic exchange with @benshapiro at the Oxford Union.
“If Israel put down its guns tomorrow there would be second holocaust. If the Palestinians put down their guns tomorrow there would be a Palestinian state”
I thought he made his points well. Worth a watch. pic.twitter.com/tbZ9PRbllk
— Lee Harris (@addicted2newz) November 3, 2023
“You don’t believe there should be a Jewish state anywhere in this region. So as long as that’s your stance, there’s no point in arguing. You can’t simultaneously hold the position that there should be no Jewish state in the region and then criticize me for saying that Arabs won’t accept a Jewish state,” Shapiro asserted.
During the full debate, Shapiro remarked, “Your logic is that if you’re a terrorist group located in a densely populated area, you can hide behind civilians and be immune.”
When one student referred to Israel’s attacks on Gaza as “one-sided ethnic cleansing,” Shapiro responded, “I certainly hope Israel is killing more Hamas…” before being interrupted by the crowd.
After being told that Israeli retaliation against Gaza was not a just war, Shapiro countered, “So it’s not a just war when you fight against people who have murdered 1,500 of your civilians?”
Shapiro further explained his position in an Op-Ed in the Telegraph.
In the article, he highlighted that the Oxford University and College Union recently considered a motion stating, “only a mass uprising on both sides of the green line and across the Middle East can free the Palestinian people,” and labeled the Hamas killing of civilians as “a direct consequence of decades of violent oppression of the Palestinian people by the Israeli state.”
“This motion is pure and simple Jew-hatred. Any attempt to equate Israel with Hamas is nothing but Jew-hatred,” he wrote.
Very fine ppl on both sides https://t.co/I4oIMVwXw9
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) November 5, 2023
“When you support Hamas and its agenda, you are endorsing the brutal murder of innocent babies; you are supporting the abduction, rape, and killing of women,” he wrote.
Shapiro emphasized that the West must recognize, as Israel has, that only by fighting back can fundamental truths prevail.
“Today, the existence of the State of Israel means that Jews no longer have to wait for others to acknowledge the existence of monsters and the reality of evil. However, the West must also come to this realization. Not for the sake of Jews. Not for the sake of Israel. But because if the West fails to defend itself, it will cease to exist. And the monsters will triumph,” he concluded.
The post Watch: Ben Shapiro Systematically Schools Oxford Students During Israeli-Palestinian Debate appeared first on The Western Journal.
How did Ben Shapiro uncover what he believes to be the hidden agenda of Oxford University students defending the Palestinian cause during the debate?
Ben Shapiro, a prominent conservative commentator, recently engaged in a debate with students from Oxford University, where he uncovered what he believes to be their hidden agenda as they defended the Palestinian cause. Snippets of the debates were posted on social media, allowing the public to witness the exchanges firsthand.
In one particular exchange, Shapiro challenged a student to identify which parts of Israel she believed were occupied by the Jewish state. Shockingly, she responded by saying, “All of Israel.” Shapiro quickly seized upon this response, asserting that what she was truly advocating for was the complete annihilation of the state of Israel, and that all her arguments were merely a facade for this intention. The conservative commentator thanked her for her time, making his stance on the matter clear.
Similar responses were given by other students as well. When the same question was posed to another student, he responded by saying “the entirety of Palestine,” but quickly added that he was not advocating for the destruction of Jews. Shapiro, once again, acknowledged this response, highlighting the perceived dissonance between rejecting the idea of a Jewish state while criticizing the lack of acceptance for Jews in the region.
Throughout the full debate, which can be viewed online, Shapiro repeatedly made his points clear. He argued that terrorist groups taking shelter in densely populated areas and using civilians as human shields cannot be immune from consequences. His logic sought to challenge the notion that terrorists can hide behind innocent lives while carrying out their activities.
These exchanges shed light on what Shapiro believes to be the true intentions of the Oxford students and their position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. According to him, they aim to undermine and ultimately eliminate the state of Israel. Their arguments, in his view, serve as a smokescreen to conceal this objective.
While the debate at Oxford University sparked controversy and debate, it also offered an insight into the differing perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This discussion is crucial for fostering understanding and promoting honest dialogue on a deeply complex issue. However, it is important to approach these debates with nuance and respect for differing viewpoints, allowing for the exchange of ideas without dismissing or demonizing opposing positions.
In conclusion, Ben Shapiro’s engagement with Oxford University students revealed what he perceived as their true intentions in defending the Palestinian cause. He argued that their ultimate aim was the annihilation of Israel, and their arguments served as a facade for this objective. These exchanges sparked debate and highlighted the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, emphasizing the need for respectful and nuanced dialogue.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
