WA bill grants nonprofit aiding in social media suppression access to elections
The Washington State Legislature Passes Bill Granting Unrestricted System Access to Nonprofit for Social Media Suppression
The Washington State Legislature has recently approved a bill that has raised concerns among county election officials. The bill requires these officials to provide unrestricted system access to a New York state-based nonprofit. This nonprofit has been involved in coordinated efforts to suppress social media content related to elections and COVID-19 “misinformation.”
“Most troubling is that it sits and operates outside of our firewall,” said Grant County Director of Central Services Tom Gaines. “We have no idea what it does, except what they tell us. It may be benign but the way it’s been framed… only validates our concerns.”
Sponsored by Sen. Javier Valdez, D-Seattle, Senate Bill 5843 mandates the use of an operating system called “Albert sensors” to detect cybersecurity threats. The bill passed the Senate with a vote of 46-3 on Feb. 2, but faced more opposition during the House vote on Feb. 27, with 58 in favor and 37 opposed.
Under this bill, county election officials are also required to report any malicious activity or security breaches to the Secretary of State’s Office (SOS). Additionally, if a county refuses to certify election results without cause, the SOS has the authority to certify the results themselves.
The bill mandates the use of the Albert sensor hardware, which is widely used in county elections offices across the country. The Center for Internet Security (CIS), a New York state-based nonprofit, manages this hardware. CIS collaborates with federal and state agencies and receives federal funding. It also coordinated the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing & Analysis Center, which has been involved in relaying censorship requests to social media platforms on behalf of the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office.
In 2023, a federal judge in Louisiana implicated CIS, the Biden administration, and others in a case regarding federal efforts to censor certain COVID-19 related content. The judge described their role as similar to an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth.”
Proposed amendments to the bill were rejected. One would have made CIS liable for any malicious activity caused by the intrusion detection system, while another would have allowed counties to choose from various intrusion detection systems. However, these amendments were rejected, with concerns that they would weaken the bill.
The bill also includes provisions for the removal of any official who provides unauthorized access to election software or hardware. A proposed amendment requiring a conviction before removal from office was rejected.
Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to protect the integrity of elections and ensure the security of voters and residents. However, critics, such as Lincoln County Commissioner Rob Coffman, believe that the bill is flawed and does not prioritize maintaining control over data and ensuring accountability.
Despite the opposition, the bill passed and will have significant implications for election processes in Washington State.
What specific measures will be put in place to prevent the potential abuse or misuse of unrestricted system access granted to the nonprofit organization?
They must provide unrestricted system access to a nonprofit organization based in New York. The intent behind this requirement is to allow the nonprofit to identify and suppress social media content related to elections and COVID-19 “misinformation.”
However, this provision has raised serious concerns among county election officials. Grant County Director of Central Services, Tom Gaines, expressed his worries about the nonprofit operating outside their firewall and the lack of transparency surrounding their activities. While the nonprofit claims that its intentions are benign, Gaines’s concerns highlight the need for more information about their operations and objectives.
The bill, sponsored by Senator Javier Valdez, D-Seattle, mandates the use of an operating system called “Albert sensors” to detect cybersecurity threats. The inclusion of this technology is intended to protect the state’s election systems from potential threats. The Senate passed the bill with a strong majority of 46-3 on February 2, demonstrating initial support for the proposed measures. However, it faced more opposition during the House vote on February 27, with 58 in favor and 37 opposed.
In addition to requiring the use of “Albert sensors,” the bill also obligates county election officials to report any malicious activity or security breaches they encounter to the Secretary of State’s Office. This reporting requirement is crucial for maintaining the integrity and security of the state’s election systems.
However, the provision that grants unrestricted system access to a nonprofit organization raises concerns about the potential for abuse or misuse of this access. It is essential to strike a balance between ensuring cybersecurity and protecting freedom of speech and privacy rights. Transparency and accountability are fundamental principles that must be upheld to maintain public trust in the electoral process.
As this bill moves forward, it is crucial for legislators to address the concerns raised by county election officials and the public. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure the activities of the nonprofit organization are in line with the intended purposes of detecting and preventing cybersecurity threats. Furthermore, robust oversight mechanisms should be established to monitor the organization’s actions and prevent any overreach or suppression of legitimate content.
In conclusion, the passage of Senate Bill 5843 by the Washington State Legislature has raised concerns among county election officials. Granting unrestricted system access to a nonprofit organization for the purpose of social media suppression requires careful consideration. While the bill aims to enhance cybersecurity measures, transparency and accountability must be prioritized to protect free speech and privacy rights. Legislators should address these concerns and ensure sufficient oversight to maintain public trust in the electoral process.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
