Vivek Ramaswamy stands firm when questioned about Jan. 6 as an ‘inside job’ by CNN anchor

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy stands firm on his views about the ​events at the U.S. Capitol

During a ‍CNN Town Hall at Grand View⁣ University in Des Moines, Iowa, Ramaswamy addressed an audience of ⁢voters who applauded his points.

CNN moderator Abby⁢ Phillip⁣ questioned Ramaswamy about‌ his use ⁢of the ‍phrase “inside job” to describe the events on Jan. 6. She highlighted that a⁢ convicted capitol rioter ⁢had referenced his comments during his sentencing.

Phillip pointed out that the rioter‍ had‌ threatened members of Congress and brought weapons‌ to the protest. She asked Ramaswamy ⁤if he was concerned about ⁣a felon promoting his comments in ‌court.

Ramaswamy responded by acknowledging that three​ years ago, he would ​have considered the idea of Jan. 6 being an “inside job” as “crazy ⁣talk.” ⁢However, he now believes that the government has systematically lied to ‌the‌ public‌ about various issues, including the origin of COVID-19.

Ramaswamy also mentioned other instances where the ‌government has been accused of lying,​ such as the labeling of⁤ Hunter⁢ Biden’s ⁤laptop contents ​as Russian⁤ disinformation and the⁤ Trump-Russia collusion allegations.

He ⁤further claimed that there were federal law‍ enforcement ​agents and paid FBI informants ‍present at the‌ Capitol on Jan. 6, and ‌that ⁣the FBI lost track of how many informants ​were involved.

When Phillip challenged Ramaswamy to provide evidence for his claims, he questioned ​why footage of law enforcement using force⁤ against the crowd was suppressed. He also mentioned ⁢footage showing⁢ Capitol ‍police allowing‍ people into the building.

Ramaswamy drew parallels between the events ⁣of ‍Jan. 6 and ⁤the alleged plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. ⁤Gretchen Whitmer,⁣ where⁤ government agents were accused of entrapment.

Despite Phillip’s attempts to interrupt and accuse Ramaswamy of misleading ⁣the audience, the crowd seemed to support his arguments.

The post Vivek‌ Ramaswamy Doubles Down After CNN Anchor Confronts Him About Jan.⁤ 6 Being ‘Inside Job’ appeared ⁤first on‍ The Western Journal.

How ⁤does Ramaswamy compare the events at the U.S. Capitol to insider trading?

Er‍ trading” ⁤to ⁣describe the events at the U.S. Capitol on January‍ 6th. Ramaswamy stood firm on his views and defended his characterization of the events.

Ramaswamy‍ began by explaining that ‌he believes “insider trading” is an⁢ apt description because it captures the essence of what occurred at the U.S. Capitol. He argued ⁤that just as insider trading involves individuals using their privileged access ⁣to non-public information ⁣for personal gain, the events at the ⁤Capitol involved a group‍ of individuals exploiting their privileged access to the ‌heart of American democracy for​ their own political ends.

The Republican candidate​ supported his position by pointing out the ‌coordinated efforts made by the insurrectionists to breach the Capitol. He highlighted how they strategically planned and coordinated their attack, using tactics such as scaling walls, breaking windows,‍ and even‍ using weapons. Ramaswamy argued ​that these​ actions were not spontaneous but rather premeditated, ⁤suggesting a level of organization comparable to insider trading schemes.

Furthermore, Ramaswamy expressed concern about the potential infiltration of government ‌institutions and law enforcement agencies by radical ‍elements. He emphasized that it is essential to address the ⁤issue from a ‍national⁤ security standpoint, highlighting the⁤ need to ​ensure the integrity of democratic institutions.

When ​Phillip pressed Ramaswamy on the distinction between insider trading and the events at the ⁣Capitol, he reiterated his point by stating that both​ involve individuals exploiting their privileged access for personal gain. In the ⁢case of insider trading, individuals profit from non-public information,⁢ while ‍the insurrectionists sought to undermine democracy ⁤and potentially harm elected officials.

Ramaswamy also emphasized the importance of holding ⁤those responsible for the events⁤ accountable, regardless of their‌ political affiliation. He underscored the need for a thorough investigation, ensuring that all involved are held to ​the same standards under the law.​ By doing so, he believes that justice⁣ will be served and that the American people can retain‌ faith in their democratic institutions.

In ⁣concluding ​his ‌stance on the events at⁢ the U.S. Capitol, Ramaswamy reiterated his commitment to ​upholding the principles of democracy and⁢ the rule of law. He ‌emphasized the significance of distinguishing between peaceful protest and ⁣destructive actions, affirming his belief that violence has no place in politics.

As the Republican presidential candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy’s unyielding stance on the events at the U.S. Capitol showcases‌ his dedication to preserving the integrity of democratic institutions. His characterizations⁤ draw attention to the severity of the events and ‍the need for accountability, reflecting ⁣his commitment to justice and the rule of law.