Virginia Judge Sides With Teacher Suspended After Opposing Loudoun Transgender Policy, Can’t Be Punished for Beliefs
A Virginia judge granted a permanent injunction protecting the speech rights of a Loudoun County teacher who was placed on leave last May following remarks at a school board meeting about a proposed transgender policy.
The ruling blocks the Loudoun County School Board from punishing Tanner Cross, a physical education teacher at Leesburg Elementary School, for his views about Policy 8040, which is the district’s transgender policy.
“Teachers shouldn’t be forced to promote ideologies that are harmful to their students and that they believe are false, and they certainly shouldn’t be silenced from commenting at public meetings,” said Tyson Langhofer, a lawyer with Alliance Defending Freedom who has been representing Cross.
“While we are very pleased that Tanner will be able to keep serving his students in light of this settlement, the concerns expressed in our ongoing lawsuit challenging the district’s policy remain,” he added.
Cross spoke up at a school board meeting in May, saying that he did not support Policy 8040, which was being considered at the time. Soon after the meeting, he was placed on administrative leave.
After Cross sought help from ADF, however, a judge put a hold on the suspension, allowing him to return to school at least until December.
According to ADF, the district will also have to pay $20,000 of Cross’s legal fees and expunge the record of his suspension from his teacher files.
Still ongoing is a lawsuit brought by Cross and two other teachers in the county against Policy 8040, which the county has now implemented. One of the policy’s stipulations is that teachers must use the preferred pronouns of their students, something Cross has said he objects to as a Christian.
“When I spoke I was thinking about my values, my students, my parents, and my fellow teachers,” Cross said at a rally after his suspension. “The truth is I am not alone. Many of us are concerned that proposed policies would harm students and require us to violate our beliefs by saying things that are not true.”
His suit against the policy, Cross vs. Loudoun County School Board, explained the teachers’ objections.
It says that “they would be forced to communicate a message they believe is false—that gender identity, rather than biological reality, fundamentally shapes and defines who we truly are as humans, that our sex can change, and that a woman who identifies as a man really is a man, and vice versa.”
The suit continues, “But if
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
