the epoch times

Report: Vanguard Funds Invest in Chinese Military Firms

The Vanguard Group Invests in Chinese Military ‌and Forced Labor, Report Says

The Vanguard Group, one of the world’s largest ​asset‌ managers,‌ has been found to invest in Chinese military groups ‌and companies associated⁣ with forced labor through its index funds, according to ​a new report. This ⁤revelation ⁤comes as⁤ the ​Treasury Department⁣ finalizes rules related⁢ to a White House ⁤executive ​order ​that restricts⁣ certain outbound investments ​to ​China.

Vanguard’s⁤ flagship emerging markets index fund,⁣ valued at $70 billion, includes 60​ companies on the Chinese military‍ company sanction ​list by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Additionally, Vanguard ⁣funds hold shares in eight Chinese⁣ companies sanctioned for human ⁣rights abuses in ​China’s Xinjiang‌ region, which ‍the U.S. State ⁣Department has identified as⁢ a‍ genocide.

Related Stories

The ‍report did not provide a comprehensive⁤ list of Vanguard’s investments in Chinese ​military⁢ companies,⁢ but it ⁣did disclose a total of $100 million invested in three such groups.

While these investments are legal, the⁤ Coalition for a Prosperous America (CPA) ​is urging Congress to address ⁢this issue, stating⁣ that the U.S.‍ government’s weak response has allowed asset management industry greed to overshadow investor protection, national security, and human rights concerns.

Representative Mike Gallagher, chair of the House Select Committee​ on ‌the ⁣Chinese Communist Party (CCP), emphasized the need to stop American capital from‍ flowing to ⁤China and⁣ investing in ⁢blacklisted CCP-connected companies. He stated, “If ​we accept the status quo, we are willfully fueling⁣ our own destruction.”

Congressional scrutiny ⁢of Wall⁢ Street’s role in financing Chinese military companies has⁣ been increasing. Just three ‍months ago,‍ Rep. Gallagher’s committee launched‌ an investigation​ into ‌BlackRock and MSCI ‌for channeling funds to⁤ Chinese companies involved in ​building weapons for the Chinese military. The⁢ committee estimated that BlackRock’s ⁤investments amounted⁣ to ⁤$429 million ⁣against American interests.

In response to ⁤the report, BlackRock closed its China-focused offshore‍ fund, requiring shareholders to‌ redeem ‌their shares before the fund’s liquidation. Vanguard, on ​the other hand, maintains⁤ compliance with all applicable​ laws and regulations and welcomes additional clarity from ⁤policymakers.

In ​August, President Joe Biden issued an⁢ executive order prohibiting outbound investments to China in ‍certain industries. The Treasury Department has published preliminary rules, which exempt⁢ index funds‌ from ⁤the restrictions. The public commentary period for these rules has closed.

‌What are the ‍ethical implications of Vanguard’s investments in⁢ companies with ties to the Chinese military and forced labor?

Tories”>China’s Infrastructure Investment Could ‍Tumble Next, Experts Say – 10/12/2023

The report, ⁣released by non-profit organizations‌ Committee on the ⁢Present Danger: China and PROTECT, ⁣highlights the extent ⁤of ⁢Vanguard’s investments in companies with⁣ ties to ​the Chinese⁤ military and forced labor. ⁣It raises concerns about‌ the ethical implications of investing in such institutions and the potential support of human rights abuses.

Vanguard‍ is known for its⁤ passive index funds, which track various ⁤benchmarks.‍ It is estimated that Vanguard’s emerging markets index fund allocates approximately ‍28% of its total‍ assets to Chinese companies, making it one ⁣of ‌the largest⁤ investors in China. While Vanguard argues that its index funds are designed​ to replicate the performance of a specific⁢ index‌ and do not involve active investment decisions, critics argue that ​by including these companies in their funds, Vanguard is indirectly​ supporting ​activities that go against ethical standards.

The ​issue of forced ​labor in China’s​ Xinjiang region has⁢ gained significant attention⁢ and condemnation from the international community. The Chinese government has been ⁤accused of detaining more than one million Uighur Muslims and other ethnic minority groups in⁤ reeducation camps and subjecting them to forced ​labor. Reports‍ of​ surveillance, indoctrination, and ‌human rights abuses have led to calls for action against those ⁣involved in supporting these‌ activities.

The inclusion of companies associated with forced​ labor and the ‌Chinese military in Vanguard’s index funds raises questions about the due diligence conducted by asset managers. While Vanguard is not alone in​ investing in these companies, due to the ‍size and influence of its funds, ‍its investments are ⁣significant and warrant scrutiny. Some argue that Vanguard should ⁣take greater responsibility in assessing the ethical implications of its holdings and ⁤actively work​ towards divesting from such companies.

This ​report ‌comes⁤ at a time when governments, including⁤ the United States, are reevaluating their relationships with China ⁣and imposing ⁤restrictions on certain investments. The finalization ⁢of rules related ⁢to the White⁤ House executive order ​restricting investments to China further emphasizes the need for asset managers to be ​aware of the companies in which they invest and the potential consequences of such investments.

The Vanguard Group has yet​ to publicly respond ‍to the report’s findings. However, the revelations may prompt a reassessment of ‌the company’s‌ investment strategies and ⁣policies. ‍Investors ⁤and stakeholders may demand greater transparency and⁤ accountability from Vanguard and other asset managers, pushing ​for⁤ more responsible investment practices that align ⁢with ethical and⁤ human rights standards.

The⁤ issue⁢ of investing​ in companies linked to forced labor and​ the Chinese military highlights the complex ethical considerations faced by asset managers. As the world becomes‍ increasingly‍ interconnected, investment⁢ decisions can have⁣ far-reaching implications. It is crucial for investors, regulators, and the ‍public to be vigilant and hold ⁣asset managers ​accountable for their investment ⁣practices⁢ to ⁣ensure they align ⁢with ⁣global‌ ethical standards.

The Vanguard Group’s investments in Chinese military ​groups and companies associated with forced labor⁤ raise important questions‍ about the role of asset‍ managers in promoting ethical ⁢investment practices. As individuals​ and institutions alike continue to navigate‌ the complicated ⁣landscape of global investing, it is essential to evaluate the potential consequences of ‌investment decisions and ‍demand greater transparency⁢ and accountability from those who ‌manage our investments.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker