Texts: Fauci Sneezed At Red Flags About The Vax And Miscarriage

Dr. Anthony Fauci privately raised concerns early on about the rapidly produced Covid vaccinations and their potential links to miscarriage despite very public assurances that there were “no red flags,” according to a 2021 text chain released Monday by the committees investigating the disgraced, Fifth-taking Covid czar.

“I asked around a bit more and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose [of the vaccine], this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester,” Fauci wrote in a Jan. 25, 2021, text on his government-issued cellphone.

The alarming messages between the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director, Rochelle Walensky (then-director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the Biden administration), and Vivek Murthy (former U.S. surgeon general under Presidents Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden) are among a tranche of new Fauci communications obtained by Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. Paul is chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee; Johnson chairs the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

Murthy took comfort in Fauci’s expertise.

“I’ve been hearing the concern about the mRNA causing mutations in the developing fetus as well. That’s a really good point re the cytokine storm post second dose,” Murthy wrote the group.

All told, the trove includes some 34,000 text messages and 522 voicemails, according to the Republican committee leaders. Like Fauci’s Covid-era government diary entries released late last month, the narcissistic NIAID chief’s phone messages further suggest he and fellow federal public health officials covered up inconvenient truths about their handling of the virus — and the rush job they did on pushing a relatively untested vaccine on a public in panic.

‘Well, Are the Vaccines Safe?’

“Agree with Rochelle. There are no data or theoretical reason to believe that vaccinating early versus later in pregnancy would be preferred. Yet, some people (even female health care professionals) feel concerned about injecting a ‘genetic’ vaccine very early in pregnancy,” Fauci wrote to the group at 4:57 p.m. on Jan. 25, 2021, roughly a month and a half after the first Covid vaccines were first rolled out to the public.

“There is this misperception out there that we need to deal with that mRNA somehow can ‘get into your genes.’ When the misperception gets extended to an early developing fetus, the anxiety heightens,” Fauci added.

But just days later on Feb. 3, 2021, the Covid czar was publicly insisting that the Food and Drug Administration had —  to that point — discovered “no red flags about that, about pregnant women.”

Federal health officials still had no public concerns with the vax on Aug. 11 of that year, when the CDC “strengthen[ed]” its “recommendation for pregnant women to get vaccinated against Covid-19,” CNN dutifully reported. As the corporate news outlet noted, the agency had previously been “vague in its recommendation,” stating, “If you are pregnant, you can receive a Covid-19 vaccine.” Nothing about the miscarriage concerns Fauci noted to the pandemic gang in late January.

“We are not seeing a signal of safety concerns of the vaccine in pregnancy,” Sascha Ellington, team lead for emergency preparedness and response in the CDC’s Division of Reproductive Health, told CNN at the time.

By Aug. 30, as Fauci’s ego was nearly exploding from all of the attention and acclaim he was receiving, the smiling NIAID director was telling the What to Expect podcast audience that “pregnant women should get vaccinated.”

“Well, are the vaccines safe?” Fauci asked before answering his own question. “10s and 10s and 10s of thousands of women who have been followed by the CDC, who have been vaccinated when they were pregnant, there’s no indication whatsoever that there’s any increase of any adverse issues in a pregnant woman who was vaccinated compared to a pregnant woman who wasn’t vaccinated,” he told the show’s fawning host Heidi Murkoff, “It’s pretty clear that pregnant women should get vaccinated.”

It didn’t seem so clear a few months prior.

‘Did You See the Announcement Today?’

“For pregnant women considering getting the vaccine, are you aware of any data or theoretical reason why vaccinating early vs late in pregnancy would be preferred? And any sense of when there will be more robust data on vaccine risk in pregnant women?” Murthy wrote in the January 2021 text chain. Fauci weighed in with his thoughts on the vaccines’ theoretical associations to miscarriage in the first trimester.

“I’ve been telling pregnant women that there hasn’t been evidence of concerning adverse outcomes in the trials though the number of pregnant subjects was likely have been limited,” Murthy continued.

Murthy followed up the next day with a startling text.

“Tony, Rochelle, did you see this announcement today from WHO [the World Health Organization] saying they advise against pregnant women taking the Moderna vaccine bc of lack of data? It has led to a flurry of questions. What is your take? I imagine we will all get asked about this,” he wrote. Murthy included a link to the WHO site.

Fauci shrugged off the WHO’s concerns, telling the pandemic gang that, as with “any vaccine in which data are lacking in pregnant women one must weigh the potential risks against the benefits.”

That seems to have been his pat answer to any critic with concerns about the relative versus absolute risks of getting — or not getting — the shot.

“COVID-19 can be a serious disease especially in pregnancy. In the vaccine trials, pregnant women were not allowed but following the EUA [Emergency Use Authorization], a large number (more than 10,000) pregnant women have been vaccinated,” Fauci wrote. “No issues have arisen. The FDA and the ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] and the ACOG [American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists] are all permissive for pregnant women to have a choice. Animal tox studies did not raise any red flags.”

That’s the “science” Americans were shamed into following? With limited tracking, the “experts” pronounced the vaccine safe for pregnant women and their unborn babies. “No red flags.”

And the “experts” kept pushing the vaccine for healthy people. Critics assert the consequences were severe.

‘Riddled with Conflicts’

“It is difficult to conceive of a more egregious breach of medical ethics by the government-controlled, medical-industrial complex than the systematic promotion of COVID-19 vaccination to pregnant women — thereby, through transplacental transfer, effectively vaccinating their unborn and newborn children,” James A Thorp, an obstetrician-gynecologist, told the Permanent Investigations subcommittee in written testimony.

Deception, the doctor alleged, was the name of the game for the vax masters.

Thorp noted the “now-infamous” Shimabukuro study that was published on April 21, 2021, in the digital version of the New England Journal of Medicine.

“The authors claimed a miscarriage rate of 12.6%, but the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester,” Thorp wrote. “This is consistent with the 81% miscarriage rate noted in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market data.”

In short, the high rates of miscarriage associated with the vaccines “mirror[ed] the effects of chemical abortion,” the OB-GYN claimed.

In the same edition of the New England Journal of Medicine, Walensky and the journal’s Editor-In-Chief Eric Rubin published an op-ed. The two published pieces were “riddled with conflicts of interest and deliberate misrepresentations intended to coerce pregnant women into taking the vaccine,” Thorp wrote.

But the CDC stands by Covid vaccinations for pregnant women, asserting that “studies have shown no increased risk for complications like miscarriage, preterm delivery, stillbirth, or birth defects.” The agency cites a long list of benefits, particularly the vaccines reducing the risk of severe illness associated with the virus.

The dominant research backs up the CDC, but the assertion that there is “no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are associated with an increased risk of miscarriage” is certainly not universally accepted. One key study purportedly left out research data that showed the vaccines caused “significant harms to pregnant women and infants.”

“The more I’ve looked into this, my eyes have opened up in terms of the lack … of proper studies,” Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson told me Monday on The Jason Goch Show in Milwaukee.

“We have been lied to repeatedly,” the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations chairman added.

The Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee last week — on an 8-5 party-line vote — approved holding Fauci in contempt of Congress after the Covid czar invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination more than 100 times while under oath before the committee. The matter now heads to the Department of Justice for review.

Johnson cast one of the “yes” votes, asserting that Fauci didn’t just hold Congress in contempt; he held the American people in contempt.

“There are so many legitimate questions that must be answered. Some of those questions only he can answer,” the senator said. “We have quotes from him earlier [saying] he’s not concerned about congressional oversight, he’ll appear before any congressional committee, he’s not afraid of anything. Well, that proved untrue.”

Matt Kittle is a senior elections correspondent for The Federalist. An award-winning investigative reporter and 30-year veteran of print, broadcast, and online journalism, Kittle previously served as the executive director of Empower Wisconsin.