People Noticed Dems Enjoy Violence. NYT Says It’s ‘Free Speech’
The article criticizes The new York Times for its perceived biased portrayal of political violence and free speech issues. It highlights a recent incident where charlie Kirk was shot, and condemns the media’s double standards-describing violent acts against right-wing figures as free speech, while framing similar actions against leftists as threats to democracy. The piece recounts how liberals and Democrats have celebrated or mocked violence toward conservatives, including online disrespect and even celebrating violence after Kirk’s death. It also cites polls indicating many Democrats would feel indifferent or pleased if Trump were assassinated, illustrating the contentious nature of free speech debates. The author argues that liberals are inciting violence while condemning efforts to suppress it, portraying the current political climate as deeply divided over the issue of free expression and violence.
Just a few days after the anniversary of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, The New York Times is here with some thoughtful insight. Namely, that it’s their free speech right if Democrats want to celebrate murder and advocate more political violence.
Why, this is America, isn’t it?!
Writing in the Times on Tuesday, authors Matthew Purdy and Alan Feuer warned of the Trump administration’s “nearly exclusive crackdown on left-leaning organizations and activities,” which they described as a “pitched battle over political dissent and free speech.” Lest there be any doubt this was related to Kirk’s assassination by a psychotic leftist, the headline on the “analysis” piece was “How Trump Has Cracked Down on Dissent Since the Killing of Charlie Kirk.”
When a transgender-loving freak allegedly pulls out a gun in front of children in broad daylight to murder a man who was a husband and father of two, and was widely regarded as a political leader on the same level as presidents, the Times will call it “political dissent and free speech.” But only if the target is a right-winger. If it’s a leftist, then the foundation of democracy across the globe is threatened.
To wit, the Times piece quoted a Democrat woman in her 80s who, after joining an anti-ICE riot, wrote in her diary that “the threats to our democracy by this administration seem immediate and real and very personal.”
This is how they justify their sick fantasies and frequent bouts of violence. When they’re not celebrating the explicit harm and death brought onto their political opponents, they’re declaring in their diaries and on social media that the real threat is from Trump voters having an opinion.
After Kirk’s murder, TikTok was flooded with Democrats mocking the moment he was blasted in the neck with a rifle and glorifying the result. Someone who opposed their political positions was no longer a threat. That it happened in brutal fashion was a bonus they hadn’t expected but were more than happy to see. And when others noticed and drew attention to it, some of those ghoulish violence advocates lost their jobs. Or as the Times put it, “Hundreds of people who criticized Mr. Kirk’s politics online lost or were threatened with losing their jobs.”
Yes, the woman who immediately after Kirk’s death posted, “F—— his kids. F—— his ancestors, especially the b-tch who birthed him” had merely “criticized Mr. Kirk’s politics online.” And a pus-filled infection that needs to be amputated is just a boo-boo.
A survey of Democrat voters this month published by the Center for Strategic Politics asked respondents how they would feel if in the morning they read a news headline that President Trump had been publicly assassinated. Not even half said they would feel bad about it. Roughly a third said they would actually feel good. Nearly another third said they would be indifferent.
This is the “battle over free speech” that the Times is talking about. Democrats get to wish for and stoke more political violence. Only when there’s any attempt to “crackdown on left-leaning organizations and activities” is there a problem.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
