US pediatricians ‘reaffirm’ child gender transition policy as Europe raises concerns.
The American Academy of Pediatrics Stands Firm on Child Gender Transition Procedures
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recently made headlines by reaffirming its support for child gender transition procedures. However, in light of the increasing number of states outlawing these practices, the AAP has ordered a systematic review to examine its stance.
Debate Surrounding Child Gender Transition Procedures
With over 20 states banning child gender transition procedures and European doctors taking a different approach, the AAP’s decision has sparked intense debate. Many are questioning whether the AAP’s position aligns with the current legal landscape and medical opinions.
Confidence in the Review
The AAP remains confident that the systematic review will validate its support for genital mutilation and chemical castration in children. Mark Del Monte, the CEO and Executive Vice President of the AAP, emphasizes the organization’s commitment to providing young people with the reproductive and gender-affirming care they need.
Current AAP Policy
The AAP’s current policy, outlined in its October 2018 statement, fully embraces various aspects of child gender transition. This includes pronouns, restrooms, and the use of drugs and surgeries. The upcoming review aims to provide pediatricians with updated technical reports, data, and research on the subject.
European Concerns
While the AAP stands by its position, concerns from medical leaders in Western European countries cannot be ignored. Doctors in Norway, Finland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom have expressed reservations about the “gender-affirming care” model for children. They argue that it may do more harm than good.
Comparison with Europe
A study conducted by the medical advocacy group Do No Harm reveals that the United States is the most permissive country when it comes to legal and medical gender transition for children. France, while relatively permissive, acknowledges the uncertainties involved in transgender medical care for children. France’s National Academy of Medicine urges caution due to potential complications and undesirable effects.
Concerns and Complications
The French report on child gender transitions highlights complications associated with cross-sex hormones and surgeries. These include stunted growth, bone fragility, sterility, emotional and intellectual damage, and menopause-like symptoms in young girls. The report emphasizes the irreversible nature of surgical interventions.
International Perspectives
Other countries, such as the United Kingdom, also express reservations about child gender transitions. The National Health Service warns against allowing children to change their names or pronouns, as it can have significant effects on their psychological functioning. The NHS has implemented bans on transition drugs for children and closed the country’s only gender transition clinic for children.
Norway, Finland, and Sweden have also raised concerns about these interventions. Experts argue that allowing children to pursue gender transitions negates their bodies and may send the message that something is wrong with them.
The AAP’s Stance
Despite the ongoing review, the AAP maintains its opposition to laws that block child gender transition procedures. This opposition extends to states such as Texas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Missouri, Arkansas, and more.
As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the AAP’s systematic review will impact its position on child gender transition procedures.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
