US Pardon Attorney Ed Martin Announces Investigation of Biden Pardons
The discussion surrounding former President joe Biden’s use of an autopen for issuing presidential pardons has intensified, with United States Pardon Attorney Ed Martin calling for an examination of the situation to uphold the integrity of the American Pardon System. He emphasized the need to clarify who was involved in the pardons issued under Biden’s name.
House Oversight Commitee Chairman James Comer has identified White House staff who may have used the autopen for not just pardons,but also executive orders. An autopen replicates a signature,which raises concerns about whether Biden was aware of or consented to its use,perhaps indicating a breach of presidential powers as outlined in the Constitution.
Comer announced plans to hold interviews and possibly subpoenas for those involved in the autopen’s usage, aiming to investigate decisions made during Biden’s presidency, notably during a time when his mental acuity has come into question. Former President Donald Trump has previously claimed that pardons issued by Biden using the autopen should be considered void, citing concerns about the validity of the president’s authority over such decisions. The controversy indicates notable implications for the presidential pardon process and the potential abdication of executive authority.
Controversy over former President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen to issue presidential pardons has taken a new turn.
United States Pardon Attorney Ed Martin wrote on social media platform X, “The integrity of the American Pardon system requires that we examine the Biden pardons and who did what.”
“We will get the bottom of it.
“Count on us,” he concluded.
Dear Fellow Americans,
The integrity of the American Pardon system requires that we examine the Biden pardons and who did what. We will get the bottom of it. Count on us.
All the best.
Ed Martin
US Pardon Attorney— Ed Martin (@EagleEdMartin) May 19, 2025
Of course, the most important three words in Martin’s post are “who did what.”
Kentucky Republican Rep. and House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer announced last week his office had identified staffers and others in the White House who he believes used this autopen machine to not just sign pardons but executive orders, as well.
An autopen is a machine that replicates a signature.
The implication here is that Biden’s signature was put on important executive documents in place of him actually signing, and moreover, the president did not explicitly consent to its use in these instances.
This would mean someone else was exercising the president’s executive authority.
“We’re going to bring everyone that we believe was involved in any role in the use of the autopen. We’re going to invite them to come in for a transcribed interview,” Comer said when making the announcement.
“If they won’t, then they will receive a subpoena, and they will have a full-blown deposition.
“We want to find out who was actually making the decisions in the White House during the last nine months of the Biden administration when he was clearly in mental decline,” he continued, referring to Biden’s lack of mental acuity that has been recently substantiated by leaked audio with special counsel Robert Hur from October 2023.
In March, President Donald Trump posted via about his predecessor’s use of the autopen, writing, “The ‘Pardons’ that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen,” adding that Biden did not even know about the pardons.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution said, the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”
There is a strong history in the autopen’s use dating back to former President Thomas Jefferson after the device what patented in 1803.
The autopen’s use in itself doesn’t seem like an encouraging path to invalidating pardons, but its use without the knowledge or consent of the president — the person the Constitution empowers to grant reprieves and pardons — does.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
