US Appeals Court dismisses Kari Lake’s voting machine lawsuit.
Absence of Evidence Leads to Dismissal of Lawsuit Challenging Arizona’s Voting Machines
A federal appeals court has recently thrown out a lawsuit filed by former Republican candidates Kari Lake and Mark Finchem, who alleged that the use of electronic tabulation machines in Arizona’s 2022 midterm elections violated their constitutional right to vote. However, the court’s decision has left the candidates disappointed.
In their lawsuit, Lake and Finchem argued that the electronic voting machines were “inherently unreliable” and posed significant risks of hacking, tampering, and fraud. They insisted that every vote should be counted by hand to ensure accuracy and fairness.
Unfortunately for the candidates, their claims were deemed insufficient by District Judge John Tuchi, who dismissed the suit in August 2022. Judge Tuchi stated that Lake and Finchem lacked standing to sue and that their allegations were too vague and speculative to be taken seriously.
The recent ruling by the three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Judge Tuchi’s decision. The panel found no evidence to support the candidates’ claims of past hacking incidents in Arizona’s elections, leading to the dismissal of the lawsuit.
Despite this setback, Lake remains determined to fight for election integrity. She has called for similar legal actions in other states where concerns about election integrity persist. Lake’s bid for the Senate seat currently held by Sen. Kyrsten Sinema has gained support from influential Republicans, including former President Donald Trump.
Related Stories
- Kari Lake Picks Up Endorsement from Top Republican Senator – 10/17/2023
- Republicans’ Odds of Flipping Senate in 2024 a Study in Good Math-Bad Math - 10/18/2023
It is worth noting that another lawsuit filed by Lake is still pending in Maricopa County Court. In this case, Lake seeks access to ballot envelope images from last year’s election. Despite the challenges, Lake remains steadfast in her pursuit of fair and transparent elections.
While the court’s decision may have dashed Lake and Finchem’s hopes, it has not deterred their commitment to fighting for election integrity. They believe that the battle for honest elections is crucial not only in Arizona but across the entire country.
With Lake’s Senate campaign gaining momentum and receiving endorsements from influential Republicans, the fight for election integrity continues to be a pressing issue in American politics.
What does the dismissal of the lawsuit emphasize regarding the importance of evidence-backed claims and proper procedures in addressing concerns about election processes
Ling by the appeals court affirms Judge Tuchi’s decision and further solidifies the dismissal of the lawsuit. The appeals court found that Lake and Finchem failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims and did not meet the legal requirements to establish standing.
The use of electronic voting machines has been a topic of debate in recent years, with concerns raised about potential vulnerabilities and the accuracy of the tabulation process. However, these concerns must be supported by evidence and thorough investigation to be taken seriously in a court of law.
In this case, the candidates made broad assertions about the machines being unreliable and susceptible to hacking and fraud, but they failed to provide any concrete evidence to support these allegations. With no evidence to back up their claims, it is understandable why the court concluded that their allegations were too vague and speculative to be considered legitimate challenges to the constitutional right to vote.
The appeals court’s ruling also highlights the importance of standing in a lawsuit. In order to have standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate that they have suffered or will imminently suffer a concrete and particularized injury. In this case, the court found that Lake and Finchem did not meet this requirement, as their claims primarily relied on hypothetical harm rather than actual injury.
While the candidates may be disappointed with the dismissal of their lawsuit, it is essential to recognize that the court’s decision was based on the absence of evidence and failure to meet the legal standards for standing. The dismissal does not discount the importance of election security and the need for reliable voting systems. Instead, it reinforces the significance of evidence-backed claims and the proper procedure for addressing concerns regarding election processes.
As Arizona and other states continue to navigate the complexities of election administration, it is crucial to engage in constructive dialogue and evidence-based discussions to address any legitimate concerns. This requires a comprehensive assessment of the available data and technologies to ensure the integrity of the electoral process. Only with such a thorough examination can we maintain trust in our democratic system and uphold the constitutional right to vote for all citizens.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
