the daily wire

UFO whistleblower with classified knowledge remains tight-lipped about undisclosed experiences.

Retired Air Force Maj. David Grusch Claims Government Cover-Up ⁢of UFO Retrieval ‍Program

Retired⁢ Air Force Maj. ⁣David ⁣Grusch, a former U.S. intelligence and military official, has ‍made explosive claims about a government cover-up of a UFO retrieval program. In an interview‍ on BBC Radio 4’s “The World Tonight,” Grusch revealed that he has firsthand access to information that he cannot publicly discuss at this time. Grusch’s comments ⁣were⁤ in response⁤ to ​critics ‍who questioned the validity of his ⁣claims, ‍suggesting that he relied on the testimony of⁢ others. However,⁤ Grusch clarified that he and⁣ his colleagues interviewed 40⁣ highly ⁣distinguished intelligence and military personnel who were directly ‍involved in the programs.

When asked how he ‌could ‍be ⁣certain about the existence of crafts⁢ of non-human origin, Grusch explained, “There’s certain things ​that I have‌ first-hand‍ access to that I‌ can’t publicly discuss at this time. However, myself⁢ and other colleagues interviewed 40 individuals, both current⁤ and former, highly distinguished intelligence and military personnel that were specifically ⁣on the programs. And​ those who were willing, ‌I directed⁢ to ​the ⁤Intelligence Community inspector ‌general‍ so the‌ inspector general is able to interview⁢ these people⁣ that do‌ have direct, firsthand information.”

Skepticism and Congressional Interest

Despite Grusch’s ⁤bombshell allegations, skepticism remains. Some members‌ of ⁢Congress, ⁣like Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), are ⁢eager to investigate further. However,‍ House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner (R-OH)‌ expressed‌ doubts about the credibility of the whistleblowers, stating that⁣ they lacked direct knowledge and ‍relied on secondhand information.

Turner emphasized that the focus should be on more‌ pressing ⁣matters, such as the threat posed by⁢ China. He stated, “I can tell you that, certainly, ⁢there’s no evidence⁢ that what the gentleman is testifying​ about, he has — he said ‌himself personally⁢ he ⁢has no direct knowledge of.”

Government Cover-Up and Grusch’s ⁣Motivation

The Debrief initially broke the ‍story‍ in early ​June, revealing ⁢that⁢ Grusch had been ⁤denied access⁤ to information about an alleged⁢ multi-decade retrieval and reverse-engineering program. Grusch believes⁣ that the government ‌has⁣ been illegally withholding this information from Congress. ⁢He suggested that the government’s ⁢secrecy surrounding ⁤UFOs stems from concerns about the potential ⁤shock to the public and the implications for military ‌and weapons development.

Grusch also dismissed the notion that the UFO cover-up is solely​ an American issue, stating ‌that it extends to other countries and allies,‌ including the⁣ Five⁤ Eyes alliance. He emphasized ⁣that ‌transparency and media⁤ reporting⁣ biases differ across nations.

Response from the Department of Defense

The Department of Defense released⁢ a statement from its All-domain ‍Anomaly ⁤Resolution Office (AARO), stating that it has not discovered any verifiable ‌information to substantiate ​claims of possession or reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial materials. However, ​Grusch believes that the government should be held ‌accountable for potentially‌ overclassifying or misclassifying basic⁤ science.

Conclusion

Retired Air Force Maj. David Grusch’s claims ⁢of‍ a‍ government cover-up ‌of a⁢ UFO retrieval ⁤program have sparked both interest and skepticism.‌ While some members of Congress‍ are eager to investigate ‌further, others question the ⁢credibility⁣ of the whistleblowers. The​ Department of Defense denies the⁤ existence of such programs,‌ but Grusch‍ remains ‍steadfast in his‍ belief that the government has been ‍withholding crucial information. The truth behind these allegations remains shrouded⁤ in mystery, leaving the public to ponder their place in the cosmos.

CLICK HERE ​TO GET⁣ THE ⁢DAILY WIRE APP



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker