UAP Caucus denied committee; House debates Disclosure Act.

In the lead-up to ⁤the blockbuster UAP hearing on ​July 26, UFO Twitter was abuzz with anticipation of its impact on the public debate.

Following the hearing,⁢ a group ⁢of representatives from both sides of the aisle,‌ known as the UAP Caucus, promised⁢ to ⁣push ‍for transparency. They, along with ​their allies in Congress, have⁢ been working to gain further access.

On July 27, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) and other representatives co-signed a letter to Speaker of the House Kevin ​McCarthy (R-CA), ⁤requesting a Select Committee with subpoena authority.⁤ However, their ⁤request was denied, limiting their‍ efforts.

In August, the UAP Caucus sent a letter to the Intelligence Community Inspector‌ General (ICIG), asking for information related​ to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) provided by whistleblower David Grusch. The ICIG⁣ responded, stating they had not conducted any review of UAP programs.

A recent report by Public⁣ reveals that over two dozen whistleblowers, ⁤including government employees and ‍contractors, have provided information to ⁤various agencies and Congress. Some have even ​taken their ​testimony to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office​ (AARO).

While the presence of additional whistleblowers does not validate the claims of crash retrieval and reverse-engineering programs, it suggests that something undisclosed ‌is happening outside of ⁤Congress’ purview.

According‌ to Public,⁢ the whistleblowers spoke anonymously ‌due ‌to fear of retribution, echoing the concerns raised by David​ Grusch during his testimony. Skeptics argue that these claims are a cover for ‌a black-budget ‌U.S. weapons program ​or a‌ distraction from political crises.

Public addresses these perspectives, ⁣acknowledging ​the existence of UAP disinformation campaigns. However, a disinformation ​campaign through the Office of the Inspector ‌General (OIG) would be unlikely‌ due to the risk‌ of prosecution.​ The‍ possibility of ​social‍ contagion is⁤ also considered, but the pushback‍ from ‌elected officials and intelligence personnel ⁢suggests a different problem.

Regardless of the source, advocates for disclosure emphasize⁤ the importance of transparency. The UAP Disclosure Act, currently being debated,⁣ aims ⁤to declassify records‌ and establish a UAP Records Review Board.

The Senate’s Committee​ on Homeland⁣ Security and Governmental Affairs will hold confirmation hearings for the Review‌ Board members. However, sources ⁤claim that Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) has attempted to kill‍ the UAP Disclosure‌ Act.

While there is no scheduled UAP hearing ‍yet, certain members of Congress are determined to have one. ‍With more whistleblowers coming forward, disclosure advocates hope for an​ even bigger impact.

How does ⁣the ‌UAP Caucus plan to address the ​lack of public awareness and education on UAPs, and why is this important in their efforts for transparency and understanding

Rocessing. The letter expressed concerns about the lack of transparency and proper​ investigation into UAP incidents. It also requested⁤ the declassification of relevant information to allow for​ a more ⁤comprehensive understanding of ‍these phenomena.

The UAP Caucus has been actively engaging with⁣ government officials and agencies ⁢to gather‍ information and ⁤support for their cause. They have sought meetings with the Department of Defense, the Federal Aviation Administration, and other relevant agencies to discuss‍ UAP sightings and incidents. ‍Their goal is to ​ensure that these incidents are taken seriously​ and properly investigated.

One⁢ of the key ‌concerns highlighted by the UAP Caucus is the potential ‍threat posed by UAPs to national security. In the letter to the ICIG, they stressed ‌the⁢ need for a coordinated effort ⁤to⁢ collect and analyze data on UAP incidents. They argued that by understanding these ‍phenomena better, the ⁤government can ⁤develop strategies to⁢ mitigate any potential risks they may pose.

The ⁤UAP Caucus also recognizes the need for public awareness and education on the topic⁢ of UAPs. They have called for ​the release of declassified information to the public to foster a better understanding of ⁣these phenomena. ​By engaging with the public⁣ and addressing their concerns, they ​hope to remove the stigma associated with UAP sightings and⁤ encourage individuals to report their experiences without fear of‍ ridicule or disbelief.

The UAP Caucus ‍has faced challenges in their efforts to gain further access and support ⁤for their cause. The denial of their request for a Select Committee​ with subpoena⁣ authority ​was ⁢a ⁢setback, limiting their ability to investigate UAP⁤ incidents thoroughly. However, they remain determined and have ​vowed to ⁢continue their fight for⁢ transparency.

As the⁤ UAP debate continues, the role of social media, particularly​ UFO Twitter, in shaping public opinion cannot be⁣ overlooked. The online‍ community has ⁤played a significant role in spreading information, sharing personal ‌experiences, and mobilizing support for the​ UAP‍ Caucus. ​It has provided a platform for individuals to⁣ engage ​in discussions and express their views on the subject.

While the UAP hearing on July 26 was a ⁣significant event, it is merely ⁢a part of the ongoing efforts to address the UAP phenomenon. The UAP Caucus and ⁣their allies ⁤in Congress ‌are committed to pushing for transparency, proper investigation, and public awareness. Their dedication and ⁢persistence in this endeavor ⁣are crucial⁣ in shaping the future discourse ⁤surrounding UAPs.

As the UAP⁣ Caucus continues its work, it is essential for the ⁤public‌ to remain informed and ⁤engaged. ​By ⁣actively ⁢participating in discussions, sharing credible information, and supporting initiatives that ‍promote transparency, individuals can contribute ‌to a ⁤more comprehensive understanding ‍of the UAP phenomenon and its implications.

As the UAP debate unfolds,⁣ it is evident that there is a growing interest ⁣in exploring the unknown. The efforts of the UAP⁤ Caucus serve as a ⁣reminder that addressing these phenomena requires ​a⁤ multifaceted approach involving government​ officials, agencies, and the public. Only through​ collaboration and open dialogue can we hope ⁣to unravel the⁢ mysteries of the universe and gain ‍a deeper understanding‍ of the world we inhabit.