Turley states evidence lacks to impeach Biden.

Jonathan Turley: Insufficient Evidence to Impeach President Joe Biden

In a compelling testimony ‍before Congress on‍ Thursday, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley argued⁣ that the​ House has not ‌presented enough evidence ⁣to justify the‍ impeachment of President Joe Biden.

Turley ⁣emphasized the early stage ⁤of the impeachment​ process, highlighting that‍ House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced a⁤ formal‍ inquiry into corruption allegations just weeks ago.

Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley, ⁣one of the‌ GOP’s ⁤impeachment witnesses, says: “I do not believe that‍ the current evidence would support articles of impeachment… But I also ⁢do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry.” pic.twitter.com/x3cfYKwr5o

— ‍Justin​ Baragona (@justinbaragona) September⁤ 28, ⁢2023

Turley further stated that he believes the House has met the threshold for⁣ an impeachment inquiry into ⁤President Biden’s conduct, citing⁤ three undeniable facts. He accused Biden of​ making false statements about foreign business deals, being involved ⁣in a multi-million dollar influence peddling scheme, and potentially benefiting from that money.

However, Turley cautioned against jumping ⁤to conclusions, emphasizing that‌ these are⁢ merely allegations and should not be ⁢presumed as impeachable conduct.

In his written testimony, Turley outlined “guardrails” to prevent both major parties from abusing their power. He expressed his dissatisfaction with past presidents’ dishonesty, dating back to James Madison, and stressed the​ importance of avoiding confirmation bias and standing together before⁢ passing judgment based on evidence.

The hearing also featured three other‍ witnesses: forensic accountant‍ Bruce Dubinsky and former Assistant Attorney General Eileen O’Connor, called by the Republican majority,‌ and Michael Gerhardt, a professor of jurisprudence ‌at the ⁤University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, invited ‌by the Democrats.

House Oversight​ Committee Chairman James Comer assured that the ⁣committee would examine over two dozen⁤ pieces of evidence exposing Biden’s alleged​ corruption and abuse of public office. He pledged that⁣ the committee, led ⁤by Republicans, would not engage in “witch hunts” based on manufactured allegations without substantial evidence.

While Democrats have dismissed the Biden impeachment inquiry as ⁣politically motivated and lacking evidence, the White House has called on the media to support their ​efforts in fending off the investigation.

⁤ What concerns does Turley’s testimony ⁣raise about the motivations behind calls for impeachment and the need for‌ a​ fair and ⁢impartial examination of⁢ allegations against President Biden

‍Ry.”

—‌ Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 28, 2022

During his testimony, ⁢Turley made it clear ⁢that he does not believe there is enough evidence to support articles of impeachment ‍against⁣ President Biden. However, he also acknowledged that the House has crossed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry.

Turley’s statement comes in the ‌wake of increasing calls for impeachment from Republican lawmakers, who allege⁢ that President‍ Biden has committed acts of corruption. House Speaker‌ Kevin McCarthy initiated a formal inquiry into these allegations just a few weeks ago.

However, Turley argued that the evidence⁣ presented thus far ‍is not ⁢sufficient to warrant impeachment. He highlighted the need for‍ a thorough investigation and ​the ⁤gathering of⁢ more evidence before making ​any conclusions. Turley‍ stated, “I do not believe that the current evidence would​ support articles of impeachment.”

Turley’s testimony ⁣sheds light on the procedural stage of the impeachment⁢ process. It is essential to follow a fair and ‌comprehensive investigation, gathering all the necessary⁤ evidence before proceeding with articles of impeachment. Rushing the process without sufficient evidence could⁢ undermine⁢ the credibility‍ and⁣ legitimacy of the impeachment proceedings,⁣ regardless of the political affiliation involved.

Moreover, Turley’s perspective raises questions about the⁣ motives behind the impeachment calls. It‌ is crucial to distinguish between legitimate concerns of corruption and politically motivated attacks. ⁣Turley’s observation reminds us to tread⁢ carefully and adhere⁤ to a fair and impartial investigation, ensuring that justice is served and‍ the truth‍ is⁤ revealed.

As the impeachment inquiry unfolds, it is essential for lawmakers⁤ to keep Turley’s testimony in mind. The pursuit⁤ of truth⁢ and justice⁢ should‍ prevail over partisan agendas. A thorough evaluation of evidence and a fair examination of allegations against President Biden are necessary before any ⁣decision regarding impeachment is made.

In conclusion, Jonathan Turley’s testimony before Congress highlights the lack of sufficient ⁢evidence to impeach President Joe Biden at this stage. While an impeachment inquiry ​has ⁣been initiated, it⁤ is vital ‌to conduct a thorough investigation, gathering more evidence to make a well-informed decision. Rushing the process without proper evidence could undermine the credibility ⁣of⁢ the proceedings. As this process continues, it is crucial that lawmakers prioritize⁤ justice, fairness, and truth above partisan interests, ensuring a legitimate and just outcome for all parties⁤ involved.