Turley: Not Enough Evidence to Impeach Biden, But Investigation Needed
Jonathan Turley: Insufficient Evidence to Impeach President Joe Biden
In a compelling testimony before Congress on Thursday, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley argued that the House has not presented enough evidence to justify the impeachment of President Joe Biden.
Turley emphasized the early stage of the impeachment process, highlighting that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced a formal inquiry into corruption allegations just weeks ago.
Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley, one of the GOP’s impeachment witnesses, says: “I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment… But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry.” pic.twitter.com/x3cfYKwr5o
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) September 28, 2023
Turley further stated that he believes the House has met the threshold for an impeachment inquiry into President Biden’s conduct, citing three undeniable facts. He accused Biden of making false statements about foreign business deals, being involved in a multi-million dollar influence peddling scheme, and potentially benefiting from that money.
However, Turley cautioned against jumping to conclusions, emphasizing that these are merely allegations and should not be presumed as impeachable conduct.
In his written testimony, Turley outlined “guardrails” to prevent both major parties from abusing their power. He expressed his dissatisfaction with past presidents’ dishonesty, dating back to James Madison, and stressed the importance of avoiding confirmation bias and standing together before passing judgment based on evidence.
The hearing also featured three other witnesses: forensic accountant Bruce Dubinsky and former Assistant Attorney General Eileen O’Connor, called by the Republican majority, and Michael Gerhardt, a professor of jurisprudence at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, invited by the Democrats.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer assured that the committee would examine over two dozen pieces of evidence exposing Biden’s alleged corruption and abuse of public office. He pledged that the committee, led by Republicans, would not engage in “witch hunts” based on manufactured allegations without substantial evidence.
While Democrats have dismissed the Biden impeachment inquiry as politically motivated and lacking evidence, the White House has called on the media to support their efforts in fending off the investigation.
What is Jonathan Turley’s opinion on the current evidence regarding allegations of corruption surrounding President Biden and its sufficiency to warrant impeachment proceedings?
Ef=”https://t.co/6hmIzGzFDk”>pic.twitter.com/6hmIzGzFDk
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) December 4, 2021
Despite acknowledging that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry, Turley expressed doubt that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment. He argued that while there have been allegations of corruption surrounding President Biden, the evidence presented so far is insufficient to warrant impeachment proceedings.
As a legal expert, Turley has gained credibility for his non-partisan analysis of constitutional issues. He has previously testified as an impeachment witness during the trials of both President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump. His opinion on the insufficiency of evidence to impeach President Biden carries weight due to his previous experiences and expertise in this area.
Turley further emphasized the importance of a fair and thorough investigation, calling for the House to gather more evidence before making any hasty decisions. He argued that an impeachment should only be pursued if there is clear and compelling evidence of impeachable offenses, such as bribery or treason, that undermine the integrity of the presidency.
It is essential to note that Turley’s stance does not absolve President Biden from any potential wrongdoing. Rather, his testimony highlights the need for a more comprehensive investigation to determine the validity of the corruption allegations. This careful and meticulous approach ensures that any allegations are thoroughly examined and prevents the misuse of the impeachment process for political purposes.
As the impeachment inquiry moves forward, it is crucial for lawmakers to consider Turley’s expert opinion and abide by the principles of due process and fairness. Impeachment should be a last resort, reserved for cases where the evidence of wrongdoing is overwhelming and the constitutional integrity of the presidency is at stake.
Turley’s testimony serves as a reminder that the impeachment process is not meant to be a tool for partisan politics. It is a solemn and consequential procedure that should be approached with the utmost seriousness and objectivity. Only by adhering to these principles can the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden’s conduct be conducted in a manner that upholds the ideals of justice and the rule of law.
In conclusion, Jonathan Turley’s testimony before Congress has shed light on the insufficiency of evidence to impeach President Joe Biden. As a legal expert, his opinion carries weight and underscores the need for a thorough investigation before any decisions are made. The impeachment process should not be taken lightly, and it should be guided by the principles of due process and fairness. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of lawmakers to consider Turley’s argument and ensure that any impeachment proceedings are based on compelling evidence that justifies such a grave action against the President.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
