Trump’s NY civil case is a bold act of lawfare.
Trump on Trial: The High-Stakes Battle
Former President Trump, his sons, and his companies are currently facing trial in a case filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The courtroom drama has captivated the nation, with pundits and political commentators eagerly speculating on the outcome. Will Trump be found guilty? Will he end up in prison? While the stakes are high, it’s important to remember that this case is primarily about money, not freedom. It’s a prime example of what some call “lawfare” – the use of litigation as a weapon to inflict harm on one’s opponents.
Lawfare, the practice of using litigation as a means of warfare, has gained attention in recent years, particularly due to Trump’s high-profile legal battles. The New York case aims to financially cripple Trump and his companies, with legal costs expected to reach millions of dollars. Trials like these are time-consuming and resemble a non-physical war, involving countless meetings, court appearances, and extensive legal procedures.
What makes lawfare unique is that it allows the party bringing the case to claim victory regardless of the trial’s outcome. The New York Attorney General’s office seeks to inflict tangible harm on the Trump defendants, even if they are not found guilty. If successful, the state will impose a massive money judgment and disrupt their businesses and lives. On the other hand, if the AG loses, she will still have caused significant damage. It’s a win-win situation for the state, with no concern for outside counsel fees.
Trump’s legal battles are far from over. With numerous civil and criminal charges pending against him, the costs – both in terms of money and time away from the campaign trail – will be staggering. Lawyers are bound by ethical rules that prohibit disproportionate actions, but the practical harm caused by litigation can still be significant.
Trump Fighting His Way Off the Mat
The trial in New York has taken an unusual turn, with the judge deciding the case on pretrial motion. This is uncommon, as judges typically prefer to evaluate disputed facts and legal issues in person at trial. However, in this case, the judge accepted the state’s version of events and concluded that Trump’s experts must have lied and committed fraud. The absence of a victim or tangible harm is disregarded by the AG’s office, which is determined to destroy the Trumps at any cost.
Conservatives believe that Judge Engoron’s decisions will be reversed on appeal, as he seems to have already determined Trump’s guilt. However, the appeals process is complex, and the Trumps must first lose the civil trial and be hit with a damage award before they can fight their way off the mat. The state court of appeals will then review the judge’s decision, and if it finds errors, the case may be sent back for a second trial.
Potential Grounds for Appeal
Each of these Trump cases presents unique claims that have never been brought against others in the past. Some seek to blend civil and criminal statutes or state and federal laws in unprecedented ways. As a result, extensive motion practice is expected, creating potential grounds for appeal. If the judge awards damages that would destroy the Trump businesses, they can seek a stay of execution while the court of appeals evaluates the trial court record for reversible errors.
If Trump is found guilty in any criminal case, it is likely that sentencing will be stayed pending appeals. While some may view this as special treatment, it is a common occurrence in routine cases. Trump’s strategy is to prove that the judge made mistakes or was biased, leading to a reversal of the liability finding and any damage award. If he fails, the Trump organization will face ruin in New York, but if he succeeds, it will be a major blow to the AG, the trial judge, and the media.
The Show Trial is the Point
Even if the court of appeals reverses Judge Engoron’s decisions, the damage to the Trump family will already be done. For many, that is the ultimate goal. Trump will have endured months of trials, spent a fortune, and provided ammunition for his political rivals and the media. The damage inflicted will be significant, regardless of future vindication. This is the essence of lawfare – inflicting pain and humiliation on one’s opponents.
Likeminded individuals have launched an unprecedented legal onslaught against Trump, disregarding the long-standing rule of not targeting politicians during a campaign. The consequences of this misuse of the litigation process will be felt by both sides, with immense costs and a diminished value of citizens’ votes. It’s a dangerous precedent that could come back to haunt those who celebrate this legal battle.
Whether Trump ends up as a lawfare victim or the president of the United States once again, the impact of these trials will be far-reaching. The courtroom battles will exact a heavy toll on both sides, and the consequences of this legal warfare should not be underestimated.
Is the use of lawfare as a weapon to financially cripple Trump and his companies an abuse of the legal system? How could the primary motive of causing harm rather than seeking justice impact the trial decision
The potential grounds for appeal are numerous and complex. Here are a few examples:
First, the judge’s decision to accept the state’s version of events and disregard the absence of a victim or tangible harm could be seen as a violation of due process. It is essential for a fair trial that the judge remains impartial and considers all relevant evidence.
Second, the issue of fraud committed by Trump’s experts raises questions about the credibility of the evidence presented. If it can be proven that the experts indeed lied or committed fraud, it may undermine the entire case against Trump.
Third, the use of lawfare itself as a weapon to financially cripple Trump and his companies may be considered an abuse of the legal system. If the appeals court determines that the state’s primary motive was to cause harm rather than seek justice, it could lead to a reversal of the trial decision.
Overall, the Trump trials in New York represent a high-stakes battle between the state and the former president. While the outcome remains uncertain, it is clear that both parties are determined to fight their way off the mat. The potential grounds for appeal are numerous and complex, and the appeals process will be crucial in determining the final outcome. Regardless of the outcome, these trials serve as a prime example of the use of lawfare as a means of inflicting harm on political opponents.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
