Too large to have faith in.

American Breakdown: Why We No Longer Trust Our Leaders and Institutions and ⁢How We Can Rebuild Confidence

If ⁣you’re a working opinion journalist​ in America, you’ve probably spent⁣ some time in ‍the past few years toying with a⁢ book idea about our‍ national crisis.‍ The atmospherics of ‌the moment all but ⁢demand⁢ it. What ⁢was once quaintly thought of as ⁤the news cycle has become a ‍continuous‍ blur of despond. Political problems crossbreed with cultural​ ailments ‍and split⁤ opinions along lines so fresh and inconsistent that the terms left and right lose shades of meaning with each new debate. Wild claims disseminate via digital⁣ firehose and ‌service competing ideological camps that‍ no longer share a base reality.

A Crisis of ⁣Trust: Unraveling the Fabric ⁢of America

  • The significant failings of our recent elected officials
  • The scandals of our billion-dollar⁣ corporations
  • The prejudices of ‌our⁤ legacy media
  • The lies proffered by our public⁢ and ⁢private institutions

In other words, before we ⁤can even approach our real-world challenges, Americans are faced with an impenetrable ⁣fog of interests and biases ‍that all but precludes thoughtful contemplation.

It’s no wonder we’ve ​lost trust in just about everything. According‍ to all major polls, American trust is ⁢nosediving across the board. We don’t trust ⁤government, ⁢media, ‌education, big business, technology, or one ‌another. And this isn’t merely unpleasant background noise. Mistrust and distrust are active players in the political‍ and cultural life of the country, ​shaping our days as surely as any ‌lawmaker, lobbying group, or media behemoth.

We could really use a grand theory right about now—something ingeniously simple⁣ to capture how we got here and point us toward clear solutions. But‍ as Gerard Baker argues in the traumatically ⁢brilliant American Breakdown, the⁣ origins of our national​ trust⁤ crisis are complex⁣ and compounded, and ⁤it won’t be⁣ resolved in one ​stroke.

Baker, editor at ‍large at the Wall Street Journal, contends that the problem began with the United States’ objectively poor performance on a​ number of fronts. “It’s not that ⁤Americans have suddenly, for no reason, started distrusting institutions​ that merit trust,” he ​writes. “It is that the institutions themselves have become⁣ untrustworthy.” Here Baker wisely resists the low-hanging ⁤fruit of Trump-age resentment as ‌an explanation in ⁢itself. “To focus on the most extreme and hateful manifestations of public ⁤disillusionment is to miss the underlying cause,” he ​writes. “It is the guided⁤ leadership of the ⁣last twenty years rather than the response to it that explains America’s current plight.”

The evidence is compelling. As Baker notes, long before Donald Trump announced ⁣his candidacy, the United States entered a long‍ and dispiriting foreign war on the strength of bad intelligence, a collapse of the American financial ⁤system‍ halved ‌the average net worth of⁣ middle-class‍ households, ‌the increasing flow of illegal immigrants was serially ignored, Big‌ Tech grew ⁢rich by trading in customers’ personal ⁣data, and social‌ mobility began to stall. As⁤ Baker puts it: “To suggest⁣ that [Trump] is the architect of collapsing faith in America would be to assign him the kind of power and influence only ⁣he thinks he really wields.”

After Trump was elected, he pounded away on the entrenched political establishment as the‍ source of these mishaps. And then ⁢the establishment did its best to prove him right with a new batch ⁣of bungling and flat-out ‌deception: the false charge of Trump-Russia collusion in ‌the 2016 presidential election, the now hyper-partisan media’s daily⁣ catastrophizing‍ about conservatives, and the mistakes and misdirection of public health officials⁤ responding to the COVID pandemic. “Leading ⁣figures in public health across the country,” writes⁢ Baker, “essentially inverted the ‌scientific method,” starting with answers and culling data to match. Americans ‌noticed.

Baker adds to this⁢ run of failure the emergence of⁣ two complementary trends that were foisted​ on ⁢the public at the height of our national doubt: First, the rise of an “overclass that ⁢has ⁢more in common with its counterparts in London,⁢ Paris, or Singapore than it does with its compatriots in Louisville, Peoria,‍ or Scranton.” This‍ is the Davos crowd, the influencers, institutionalists, and​ billionaires who disdain national identity and​ embrace⁤ climate change as ‍religion. Baker’s portrayal of the Davos set ​is peerless and​ one of ‌the ⁣book’s crowning delights. Consider his summary of Davos Speak: “Wander‌ into a Davos session and‌ you⁢ will catch stakeholders dialoguing and mainstreaming multifaceted metrics in⁣ a cross-platform environment before actioning toward implementation mode. It’s English, Jim, ⁤but not as we know it.”

These mainstreaming multifaceted muckety-mucks often find⁢ common cause‍ with another emergent class that also speaks its ​own language: the radical ideologues of the campus left. What the globally minded Davos folks share with the identitarians and intersectionalists is a messianic disregard for the average American’s well-being and, ⁤in some cases, a hostility toward his real concerns. Most important, the two elite‍ forces pushed ​our culture and institutions in​ bizarre and damaging directions that do real ⁢harm to ordinary people. In something like ESG ​(Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance) investing, we see clearly how the⁢ two groups⁣ merge to ⁣shortchange everyday Americans in the name of​ globally minded heroism. ESG-guided funds invest your hard-earned money only in companies that meet certain environmental and‌ social criteria, but they generally ‍underperform funds that ⁢are ‌still stuck on‍ the crazy⁣ idea that⁢ making money for shareholders is paramount. “Not only are [Americans] forced to watch as their corporate overlords use their powerful positions to pursue ideological ‍goals many do not⁢ approve of,” Baker ⁣writes, “but they​ are actually paying for the privilege of it.”

Baker astutely dismantles a slew of ailing institutions, devoting a chapter each to politics,⁤ corporate America, news media, science, education, and technology. Each is a gem packed with insight and wit. Noting, for example, in his chapter⁢ on education ​that a recent survey showed 80 percent of Harvard faculty identified as “liberal” or “very liberal,” ‍1 percent ⁣identified as “conservative,” and zero said they⁣ were “very conservative,” Baker observes inarguably, “These are North Korean ⁢levels of political conformity.”

But the book’s great ‌strength is⁤ in resisting causal⁤ reductionism and daring to approach ​the trust fiasco in its combined magnitude. No ⁢single factor can ​begin to ⁤explain ⁣it. ⁣In his chapter‌ on social trust, Baker considers the three⁣ main causes of mistrust cited in scholarly literature: corruption, economic inequality, and racial diversity. They all ⁤appear ‍to play some role in our present crisis, but none dispositively. After‍ all, ‍as Baker points out, Transparency International still⁤ ranks the United States as one‌ of the least corrupt countries in ⁣the world. And from 2011 to 2021,‍ “on an income basis, the United ‌States actually became a slightly more equal society,⁤ and yet, levels ⁤of​ social trust have continued to decline.” Similarly, polls have shown a gargantuan shift away from bigotry in this⁣ country over the last half century, yet⁤ “Americans ⁤of all races‍ seem to ⁣have become markedly more pessimistic⁢ about racial harmony in the very recent past.”

Baker knows ‌the⁣ problem is more massive‌ than any individual grievance. Indeed, he writes movingly about the challenge of ​massiveness itself.⁣ “The vast scale of the institutions may be ​justified in ⁣terms of economies of​ scale,⁤ or by ⁢the ⁢larger ‌purpose they are serving, but dealing with these Brobdingnagian entities induces ⁣a sense of smallness in us,” he says.⁤ It’s an underappreciated point,⁣ and it applies ⁤to our interaction with businesses, universities, ⁤and government. They’ve become, in some sense, too big ⁢to trust.

Baker is modest and ‍uncharacteristically vague about⁤ offering solutions. ⁢But this is apt,⁣ as ⁣nothing elicits mistrust ⁣as​ surely as confidently proposed fixes. And grasping⁤ the ⁣size of our dilemma,‌ he‍ surely understands that the best we can hope at the moment is a good wish list. He’d like media​ companies and universities to be more ideologically diverse in their ‍hiring. He suggests more transparency from technology⁤ platforms, more accountability from big business, ⁤and so on.

If there’s good news here, it’s that⁢ opinion‌ writers can stop‍ worrying about their possible books on the great American crack-up. Gerard Baker has‍ beaten them to it with a definitive account of our complicated and uncertain times.

American Breakdown: Why We No ‍Longer Trust Our Leaders and Institutions and How We Can Rebuild Confidence
by Gerard Baker
Twelve, 288 pp., $30

Abe Greenwald is the executive editor ​of Commentary.

Their best interests at heart. This breakdown of trust​ raises important questions about the accountability and transparency of our political and economic systems. ⁤

⁣Of the least corrupt countries in the world, economic inequality is not unique to America, and racial diversity has been a part of our ​nation since its inception. So, what then is the cause of⁤ our trust breakdown?

It seems that the underlying cause lies in the erosion of shared ​values and a sense⁢ of common purpose. As Baker argues, our leaders and institutions have lost sight of their primary duty—to serve the⁢ American people. Instead, ‌they ​have become self-interested⁤ and disconnected from the concerns of ordinary citizens. The result is a deep sense of cynicism and skepticism among‍ the public, who no longer believe that those in power have

Read More From Original Article Here: Too Big To Trust

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments