To Infinity and Beyond

Elite Academic Institutions: A Moral and Intellectual⁣ Rot

Recent events have laid ⁣bare the deep-seated decay within our esteemed academic institutions. Ivy League universities, ​in particular, have transformed into quasi-religious⁢ cults, more focused on preaching their radical nonsense than on actual teaching. These institutions, attached to billion-dollar hedge funds, ‌have become disconnected from the realities‍ of average ⁣Americans, even more so than⁤ the self-righteous journalists‌ who cover ⁤politics.

A Fall from Grace:‍ Harvard’s Plagiarist ‍President

On ⁢January 2, Harvard president Claudine ​Gay resigned in disgrace, tarnished by her serial plagiarism and inability to address a simple question about advocating for ⁣Jewish genocide on ‍campus. Shockingly, her defenders claimed she was a victim of a “racist mob” waging “open war‌ on black progress.”⁣ This scandalous episode highlights the extent of the detachment of these academic elites from the real world.

Unraveling the ⁤Madness: “Unshrinking” ​and Fatphobia

Just a week later,⁣ a philosophy professor at Cornell University, Kate Manne, released a book delving into America’s supposed war on fat people. The connection‌ between these two incidents⁣ may seem ⁢unlikely, but it becomes clear as⁤ we⁣ explore ‍further. Manne, a ⁤feminist philosophy⁢ expert, self-identifies as a “small ​fat” and uses her book, Unshrinking: How to Face Fatphobia, to advocate for her cause.

Manne’s book could have presented an intriguing challenge to the prevailing belief that being overweight is detrimental to one’s health. ⁣However, it instead serves as another example of the intellectual absurdity prevalent among academic elites. ⁢From the very beginning, with its James Baldwin epigraph and trigger ‌warning about “frank descriptions of fatphobia in its intersections with⁤ racism, misogyny, ableism, transphobia, etc.,” the⁢ book reveals‍ its descent into⁤ bigotry.

Manne employs all the trendy academic buzzwords, seemingly necessary to be ⁤taken seriously in Ivy League circles. ⁤She defines fatphobia as a social injustice that unjustly ranks fatter bodies as inferior, going on to claim that anti-fatness is a “structural form ‍of oppression”‌ rooted in⁣ “fascist body⁢ norms” perpetuated ⁤by “vested capitalist interests.” The book⁢ becomes a litany of​ intersectionality, connecting fatphobia to racism, misogyny, ableism, transphobia, classism, ‌ageism,⁣ colorism, homophobia, and even anti-Semitism.

Manne’s ‍solution to fatphobia is to include fat people in the ever-expanding list of historically marginalized communities and grant them their ‌own “pride” parades. She ‌envisions a world where fat bodies are celebrated for their contribution to “human bodily diversity,” and any attempt‌ to lose weight or change one’s⁣ body⁢ is deemed bigotry.

What ​is most disheartening is that Manne⁣ positions ⁤herself as a moderate within the niche debate among “fat studies” ⁢scholars‌ at elite academic institutions. This revelation ‍highlights the alarming state of our academic elites and their‍ detachment from reality.

Perhaps it is time to question⁢ the direction our elite academic institutions are heading. Are they ‌truly centers of ⁤knowledge and critical thinking, or have they become‍ echo chambers for radical ideologies? The future of‍ education and intellectual discourse hangs in the ‌balance.

Unshrinking: How to Face Fatphobia
by Kate Manne
​ Crown, 320 ​pp., $29

⁣ How does ⁣the shift ⁣from education to indoctrination affect‌ critical thinking and exploration ⁣of diverse perspectives within elite academic institutions?

Status quo and sparked a meaningful debate about body image and societal⁤ prejudices. ‌However, it quickly‍ became apparent that her arguments were ​not grounded in rational thinking or intellectual rigor. Instead, she resorted ⁣to using emotional appeals and promoting a victim mentality. This exemplifies the moral and intellectual rot that has ⁣infected our elite academic institutions.

The Cult Mentality: Indoctrination over ‍Education

These incidents are mere symptoms of a greater problem within elite academic institutions—the shift ‌from education to ‍indoctrination. Students are no longer ‍encouraged to think critically and⁢ explore diverse perspectives. Instead, they are coerced into conforming to a specific ideology that is deemed “acceptable” by the academic elites. This ​stifling of intellectual freedom is antithetical to the purpose of higher education and undermines the very‍ foundation of academic⁤ integrity.

Furthermore,‍ the creation ​of echo chambers and safe spaces within these institutions further perpetuates this cult-like mentality. Students ⁢are shielded from opposing ideas and are encouraged to ‍view any dissent as ⁤an ‌attack on their identities. This fosters ‌an environment that⁣ is ⁤hostile to ​open dialogue, intellectual growth, and the pursuit of truth.

A Disconnect from Reality

One ⁣of ‍the most glaring issues with elite academic institutions is their detachment ⁣from the realities⁣ of average Americans. These Ivy League universities, ‌nestled ⁣in their ivory towers, have lost touch with the⁢ struggles and aspirations of ordinary citizens. Instead, they exist in their ⁤own bubble, shielded from the consequences of their radical beliefs and policies.

Moreover, the exorbitant⁣ tuition fees charged ⁣by these institutions further exacerbate the socioeconomic disparities in our society. Access to⁣ a quality education⁣ becomes a privilege only for the wealthy elite, widening the gap ‌between the haves and the have-nots. This elitism perpetuates‍ a cycle of inequality and hinders social mobility, contradicting the‍ very principles of equal opportunity that these institutions claim to uphold.

Reclaiming Academic Integrity

If our elite academic institutions are to regain their moral and ⁢intellectual standing, it is imperative that they‍ recommit to their core purpose: education. ⁤Universities should be places of open ‍discourse, where students ​are exposed to a wide range of ideas and encouraged to ⁢think critically. This requires the promotion of intellectual diversity, the fostering of free speech,⁤ and the⁢ rejection of ideological conformity.

In addition, these institutions must actively bridge the gap between academia and the real world. They must not only ‍seek to⁤ understand the experiences and aspirations of average Americans but ⁣also actively contribute to addressing the challenges ‍faced by society as a whole. This means developing programs and initiatives that promote social mobility, inclusivity, and equal access to education.

Conclusion

The moral and intellectual rot within elite academic institutions is a pressing issue⁣ that must be addressed. The pursuit of truth and⁣ the development of critical thinking skills are the cornerstone of higher education.⁢ It is essential that these institutions reclaim their purpose and distance themselves from the ‌cult-like mentality that has plagued them. By doing so, they can once again become beacons of intellectual integrity, fostering a genuine pursuit of knowledge and ‍serving as agents of positive‍ change in our society.