Third Circuit weighs quadriplegic man’s dispute of state assisted-suicide law
A U.S. Court of Appeals panel reviewed a case involving Sean Curran, a quadriplegic individual, who challenged delaware’s End of Life Options Act, claiming it infringes on disabled people’s rights by broadly permitting assisted suicide.Curran’s legal team argued that the law, which allows assisted death for terminally ill patients, could require doctors too discuss end-of-life options even during routine treatments for disability, raising concerns about discrimination against disabled persons. The case highlights ongoing legal debates as several states have recently legalized assisted suicide, with this particular case questioning the law’s scope and implications for disability rights.
A federal appeals court panel heard a quadriplegic person’s claims that Delaware’s assisted suicide law goes too far legally in allowing the controversial practice, as multiple states across the country have legalized assisted suicide for terminally ill people.
A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit heard the appeal from Sean Curran, a quadriplegic, and a coalition of disability rights groups, which allege that Delaware’s End of Life Options Act, which went into effect earlier this year, discriminates against disabled people. The law authorizes assisted suicide for people with a terminal diagnosis, but Curran’s lawyer argued the law is broad enough that it requires doctors to inform him of end-of-life options during routine treatment for his disability.
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
Already a member? Log in
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
