Think Tank Funded by Pro-Biden Billionaires Colluded With Journalists and Big Tech To Kill Hunter Biden Coverage

A prominent think tank funded by billionaire supporters of President Joe Biden colluded with social media companies and journalists to minimize news coverage of Hunter Biden’s emails before the 2020 election, internal Twitter documents show.

Aspen Digital, an arm of the liberal Aspen Institute, in September 2020 convened a working group of social media executives, journalists, and academics to develop a coverage strategy for a hypothetical “hack and dump” of Hunter Biden’s emails, according to documents published this week by independent reporter Michael Shellenberger.

A month after the “tabletop exercise,” the New York Post published emails from Biden’s abandoned laptop that detailed his foreign business dealings. Though there is no evidence that the emails were hacked, many of the attendees of the Aspen event censored or downplayed the story. Twitter and Facebook, which were represented at the exercise, suppressed the Post article on their platforms. The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and Daily Beast, which were represented by journalists or newsroom executives, either criticized the New York Post‘s report or ignored it.

It’s not clear why the Aspen organizers chose the Hunter Biden scenario, but the think tank’s involvement could raise concerns that a Democrat-aligned group sought to persuade media organizations to kill negative stories about the president’s troubled son.

Google cofounder Eric Schmidt contributed more than $2.5 million in 2020 to the pro-Biden Future Forward PAC. Craig Newmark, who founded Craigslist, gave $100,000 to Biden in 2020 and has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Democratic National Committee and other Democratic committees. Pierre Omidyar, the founder of eBay, has contributed to Democratic committees and gave $100,000 to an anti-Donald Trump super PAC. They, in addition to the Ford Foundation and Hewlett Foundation, gave more than $2 million to Aspen Digital in 2020.

Aspen organizers clearly urged reporters and social media companies to view any explosive stories about Hunter Biden with deep skepticism. An organizer of the event said that “a successful response to a hack and leak requires news organizations to blend one thing they’re good at—skepticism—and one thing they’re not—careful, slow deliberation.”

“Early cooperation among newsrooms turns out to be key,” Aspen organizer Garrett Graff wrote of the event on Oct. 7, 2020. He suggested that reporters “check with other news organizations” before publishing stories based on Hunter Biden emails. He also advised that news outlets speak with “intelligence agencies and law enforcement.”

The Aspen