Trump attorney reacts strongly to New York fraud verdict: ‘They won’t escape justice

Former President Donald Trump’s Attorney Slams Judge and NY Attorney General

In a stunning ‌judgement against⁢ Donald Trump in‍ a controversial civil fraud⁢ case brought by⁣ New York Attorney General Letitia James, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Trump to pay over‍ $350 million, banned him from doing business in New York for three years, and‌ fined ‌his sons, Don Trump Jr. and Eric ​Trump, over⁣ $4 ​million each.

“I‍ think the biggest message I can give the American​ people⁣ tonight is that he’s ⁤not going to get away with it,”⁢ said Trump’s attorney, ⁣Alina Habba, on Fox ‍News. “Letitia ​James is not going to get‌ away with it; the Biden administration is not going to get away with it.”

Now that the trial is over, Habba made it clear that‍ the legal team will come at their opponents hard and fight until the​ truth comes ‌out.

“They will not get away with it,” the attorney continued. “President Trump has done nothing wrong. ‍All he has done is‍ win​ a campaign, and that is scaring them because they know‌ when he goes back in ⁣November ​2024, he is going to ‌clean house,⁤ and that is truly the ⁤problem. It’s not about Mar-a-Lago’s worth.”

James accused Trump of making ⁤misleading financial statements to banks for better loan terms. However, the defense team ‍stood by the evaluations, emphasizing ⁢that all loans were repaid ‍and there were no victims of financial fraud.

Habba had some harsh words for James, claiming she was in⁢ the courtroom “with her shoes​ off” and sipping ⁤Starbucks.

“Miss⁤ James had her shoes off in court,” Habba said. “She had a Starbucks coffee in her hand, she wasn’t doing work,⁤ she wasn’t sitting at the council table, she was in the back with​ her shoes​ off and ‌a coffee.”

The attorney expressed her frustration with the state of the country’s legal system, where ⁢AGs are comfortable in court and⁤ let their subordinates do the work while they sit back and win.

Habba remains confident that the ‌verdict will be appealed and they will emerge victorious in the appellate division.

Related: ‘It‍ Is A Lie!’: Fani ‍Willis Explodes On Witness Stand, Judge Has To Step In

What⁤ criticisms ⁤does Dershowitz raise against‌ Judge Engoron’s ⁢impartiality and ability to render an⁣ objective decision in the case?

K this judgement is a​ clear example of the judicial system being biased‌ against Donald Trump,” argued Alan Dershowitz, former attorney for the former president. Dershowitz, a renowned legal scholar and Harvard Law ‍professor, has been a⁢ vocal ​critic of the legal actions taken against Trump since the beginning of his presidency. In ‌this latest development, Dershowitz did not hold back in expressing his disdain for Judge‍ Engoron and NY ⁢Attorney General ⁤Letitia James.

Dershowitz ​argued that the judge’s ruling was politically motivated and lacked impartiality. He pointed out that Judge Engoron had previously made public statements that showed his bias against Trump. Dershowitz questioned the judge’s ability to render ​an objective ‌decision and argued that his ⁤ruling was predetermined. He also criticized the judge for‌ not ⁣affording Trump the presumption of innocence and for disregarding the facts presented in the case.

Furthermore, Dershowitz denounced the New York Attorney General’s handling of the case. He accused Letitia James of using her position to target Trump⁣ for political reasons. Dershowitz insisted that the civil ⁣lawsuit was nothing more than⁣ a⁤ thinly veiled‍ attempt by James to stain Trump’s reputation⁣ and undermine his ⁣business interests.

Dershowitz raised concerns about the ⁢impact that this ruling would have on Trump’s future business⁣ ventures. He emphasized that the three-year ban ​from⁤ doing business in New​ York would severely hinder any potential opportunities for Trump and his sons. He argued that this restriction was not based on sound legal grounds but rather on⁤ personal vendettas and political‌ biases.

Dershowitz highlighted the potential consequences of this precedent for ‌future cases involving ​public figures. He warned that if judges and attorneys continue to use their positions to⁣ pursue ⁣personal⁢ agendas, it ​would erode confidence in the judicial system and undermine the principles of fairness and justice.

In conclusion, Alan Dershowitz, former attorney for Donald Trump, vehemently criticized Judge Arthur Engoron and NY Attorney General Letitia James for their roles in the recent ruling against Trump. Dershowitz‌ argued that the judge’s decision lacked impartiality ‌and was politically motivated. He accused Letitia James of‍ using her position ‍to​ target Trump for‌ political reasons. Dershowitz emphasized the potentially devastating consequences of this ruling for⁢ Trump’s future business endeavors and the ‍precedent it sets for future cases involving ‌public figures. Dershowitz’s remarks shed light on the ongoing controversy surrounding Trump’s legal battles and highlight the deep divisions within the American legal system.