Why Hunter Biden’s indictment is taking so long: 2020 election interference
A Shocking Indictment: Hunter Biden Charged with Tax Offenses
A federal grand jury in California returned a multi-count indictment against Hunter Biden late Thursday, charging the president’s son with multiple tax offenses. While the indictment detailed some sordid spending sprees by Hunter Biden, the crimes charged were so basic that to say Special Counsel David Weiss opted for the low-hanging fruit would be an understatement. Weiss instead limited the charges to the crimes that fell into his lap. The simplicity of the charges underscores the protect-Biden racket that operated out of the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office for the last several years.
Astonishing Revelations: Hunter Biden’s Tax Evasion
- Hunter Biden has been charged in a nine-count indictment on multiple tax offenses, including three felonies.
- The charges include willful failure to pay federal income taxes, failure to file income tax returns, and filing false tax returns.
- The indictment reveals that Hunter Biden evaded paying over $1 million in taxes while indulging in a lavish lifestyle.
In total, the indictment charged Hunter Biden with failing to pay well over $1 million of taxes owed to the federal government. The indictment further alleged that rather than cover his tax bill — or “pay his fair share,” as his father is wont to say — Hunter Biden, over the same time period, blew nearly $5 million on an “extravagant lifestyle.”
To stress the point, the indictment included a table summarizing Hunter Biden’s expenditures from 2016-2019 in various categories:
- ATM/cash withdrawals of over $1.6 million
- Payments to various women of $683,212
- Clothing expenses of nearly $400,000
- Tuition expenses of over $300,000 for his adult daughter
- Nearly $200,000 spent on “adult” entertainment
- Additional $50,000 used for other entertainment and sports
But amidst the frivolous spending, there was a glimpse of practicality — Hunter Biden contributed some money to a Roth IRA, perhaps planning for his retirement, or rather, his father’s.
However, the indictment fails to bring anything new to light. The charges are so straightforward and stale that it’s incomprehensible they were not brought against Hunter Biden earlier. This delay raises suspicions of interference in the 2020 election to protect the Democrat candidate’s son.
Testimony from IRS whistleblowers supports this conclusion, revealing a slow-walked investigation and obstruction of investigative steps before the 2020 election.
Moreover, the lenient plea deal offered to Hunter Biden by U.S. Attorney Weiss’s team further exposes the malfeasance of the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office. The deal would have allowed Hunter Biden to plead to lesser charges, including a gun charge.
Thursday’s indictment shows that federal prosecutors had sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden with multiple felony tax counts. There was no reason for Weiss to offer a weak plea deal when the authority to prosecute Hunter Biden was assured.
While the new indictment against Hunter Biden is a step in the right direction, it fails to address the more serious potential charges of Foreign Agents Registration Act violations, money laundering, and bribery. The House oversight committees continue to uncover evidence implicating not only Hunter Biden but also Jim Biden and Joe Biden in these offenses. Special Counsel Weiss’s limited approach falls short of ensuring equal justice under the law.
In what ways does the indictment of Hunter Biden highlight the need for accountability and transparency in our tax system
Etirement. However, even this act was marred by wrongdoing as he allegedly transferred over $400,000 from his business to his Roth IRA, exceeding the annual contribution limit and exploiting a loophole in the system.
These shocking revelations paint a picture of a man who not only neglected his tax obligations but also lived a life of excess and indulgence. While the amounts mentioned may seem astronomical to most ordinary citizens, it is important to note that Hunter Biden is not alone in engaging in such behavior. The indictment emphasizes the existence of a protect-Biden racket within the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office, raising questions about the fairness and impartiality of the legal system.
It is worth mentioning that the timing of this indictment raises eyebrows, as it comes at a time when Hunter Biden’s father, President Joe Biden, is facing scrutiny for his own questionable financial dealings. Critics argue that this could potentially be a politically motivated move to shift attention away from the President and onto his son.
Regardless of the motivations behind the indictment, it is crucial that justice is served. No individual, regardless of their familial connections or political standing, should be above the law. If the allegations against Hunter Biden are proven to be true, he must be held accountable for his actions just like any other citizen would be.
Furthermore, this indictment serves as a wake-up call for the need to address the loopholes and shortcomings in our tax system. It is clear that individuals who possess wealth and influence have been able to manipulate the system to their advantage, evading their tax responsibilities while ordinary taxpayers bear the burden.
The indictment of Hunter Biden should serve as a reminder that tax evasion is a serious crime that undermines the integrity of our financial system. It is imperative that steps are taken to strengthen enforcement and ensure that those who cheat the system are properly investigated and prosecuted.
In conclusion, the charges brought against Hunter Biden for tax offenses highlight the need for transparency and accountability in our legal system. The shocking details of his tax evasion and lavish lifestyle shed light on a protect-Biden racket that raises concerns about fairness and impartiality. It is now up to the courts to determine the truth and deliver justice, regardless of the political implications of this case.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
