The View’ outraged as SCOTUS considers immunity case, alleges court’s motive to favor Trump
The View Hosts Accuse Supreme Court of Plotting to Help Trump
The hosts of ABC’s “The View” expressed their concerns during Thursday’s broadcast that the Supreme Court was secretly working to “help Trump” by taking up the case regarding his immunity from prosecution.
Cohost Joy Behar, disregarding the fact that the Supreme Court was already expediting the case at Special Counsel Jack Smith’s request, questioned the timing of the case and why it wasn’t being addressed immediately.
Behar asked, “What is their motivation for not doing it right away?” Co-host Sunny Hostin chimed in, alleging that conservative justices appointed by Trump were intentionally delaying the case to ensure that Smith’s case against Trump couldn’t be completed before the November presidential election.
Hostin explained, “If this case is not resolved by the time of the election and he God forbid becomes the President of the United States, the Justice Department policy is that you can’t indict nor put on trial a sitting president. It’s his get out of jail free card.”
Goldberg interrupted, saying, “He could throw him in jail,” to which Hostin clarified, “No, no, no, I’m saying Biden could…”
WATCH:
ELECTION DENIALISM
The View calls the 2000 election case of Bush v Gore “the day democracy died” and “certainly an injustice.”
Back here, in reality, multiple recounts upheld that Bush did, in fact, win the election. pic.twitter.com/XAlDETLb7g— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) February 29, 2024
Hostin then brought up the 2000 presidential election and the Bush v. Gore case, where Gore raised questions about the Florida ballots and multiple recounts favored Bush.
“The Bush v. Gore case happened real quick,” Hostin argued, suggesting that the Supreme Court knew how to truly expedite things when they wanted to. “The Supreme Court knows how to work real fast.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Behar got sidetracked by the mention of the 2000 election, stating, “That’s when the day democracy died.”
“Well… it was certainly an injustice to many people,” Hostin replied.
“It was choking it,” Goldberg added. “It was choking it.”
How can we ensure that political discussions are based on facts and evidence rather than personal beliefs and assumptions?
Tial election.
This accusation made by the hosts of “The View” reflects a concerning trend in today’s political climate – the tendency to make baseless claims without concrete evidence. While it is important to have open discussions and express concerns, it is equally important to base these discussions on facts and evidence rather than personal beliefs and assumptions.
In the specific case of the Supreme Court’s decision to take up the case regarding President Trump’s immunity from prosecution, it is crucial to acknowledge that the Court has a duty to uphold justice and the rule of law. The timing of the case may seem questionable to some, but it is important to remember that the Court operates on its own schedule, considering various factors such as the complexity of the case and the availability of the justices.
It is also essential to recognize that the Supreme Court has a long-standing tradition of independence and impartiality. Justices are appointed based on their legal expertise and their ability to interpret and apply the Constitution, not to serve the interests of any individual or political party. To accuse conservative justices appointed by President Trump of intentionally delaying the case to benefit him is an unfounded allegation that undermines the integrity of the Court.
Furthermore, it is worth noting that the Supreme Court had already expedited the case at the request of Special Counsel Jack Smith. This demonstrates the Court’s commitment to ensuring a fair and timely resolution of the matter. By disregarding this fact, the hosts of “The View” are presenting a biased narrative that seeks to fuel existing political divisions, rather than fostering constructive dialogue.
It is understandable that emotions run high during political discussions, especially in the midst of an important election season. However, it is crucial to maintain a respectful and fact-based approach to these discussions. Making unfounded accusations and attributing malicious intentions to institutions like the Supreme Court only serves to further polarize our society and erode trust in our democratic institutions.
As responsible citizens, we should strive for a better understanding of the complexities and intricacies of our legal system. This includes acknowledging and respecting the role of the Supreme Court as an independent arbiter of justice. Instead of jumping to conclusions and engaging in baseless speculation, let us encourage informed discussions based on facts and evidence. Only then can we foster a more inclusive and informed political discourse that strengthens our democracy.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
