The Guardian wrongly labels conservative academics as pro-dictatorship.
According to The Guardian, some conservative academics are advocating for an authoritarian leader known as the “Red Caesar.” But this claim is completely false.
In a recent article for The Guardian, Jason Wilson accused Hillsdale College associate professor of politics Kevin Slack and lecturer in politics Michael Anton of promoting a “far-right dictatorship” under the guise of “Red Caesarism.” However, both Slack and Anton deny these allegations and emphasize their support for constitutional government.
The Constitution, Republicanism, and Red Caesar
In a phone interview, Anton clarified that he does not support the idea of a “Red Caesar” and instead advocates for the preservation of the original Constitution and republican government. He introduced the term “Red Caesarism” in his book, The Stakes: America at the Point of No Return, as a speculative exploration of potential future scenarios resulting from poor governance.
Anton emphasized that he does not endorse or predict the rise of a “Red Caesar” or any form of authoritarian rule. He views such regimes as inferior and undesirable.
Slack also dismissed the notion of supporting a “Red Caesar” or fascism, stating that it is not a world he or anyone he knows wants to live in. He criticized the current political power for leading the country in dangerous directions.
Both Anton and Slack argue that their discussion of a ”Red Caesar” has been taken out of context and distorted by The Guardian and other media outlets, such as Salon and The Philadelphia Inquirer. They believe these critics are attempting to discredit them and their associations.
Slack argued that those who fear a “Red Caesar” are actually paving the way for such a leader by undermining democratic institutions and consolidating power in the hands of the ruling elite.
The Formerly Democratic United States
Slack refused to entertain the question of whether he would support an authoritarian leader like a Caesar. He expressed concern about the current state of the country and the dangerous directions it is heading towards.
Anton responded to The Guardian’s accusations in The Blaze, asserting that he never made the claim of supporting a “Red Caesar” and accusing The Guardian of attempting to harm him and his affiliations.
Both Anton and Slack criticized the current government for its disregard of self-government and its actions that undermine democratic principles.
If ‘Red Caesar’ Comes, It Won’t Be Trump
Anton dismissed the idea that Trump would play the role of a Caesar, stating that Trump seeks to be a legitimate president chosen by the voters and operating within the boundaries of the Constitution.
Slack also agreed that Trump would not become a “Red Caesar,” citing Trump’s history of respecting court rulings and adhering to constitutional processes.
Both Anton and Slack criticized The Guardian for misrepresenting their views and using biased sources to support their claims.
A ‘Blue Caesar’ Poses a Greater Threat
Anton argued that a “Blue Caesar” is more likely than a “Red Caesar” due to the left’s bureaucratic power. He warned of the potential dangers posed by a leader who claims to protect democracy while infringing on individual rights and consolidating power.
Slack echoed this concern, highlighting the actions that a “Blue Caesar” might take to suppress political opponents and undermine democratic principles.
Restoring Republican Citizenship
Both Slack and Anton emphasized their preference for restoring republican institutions and promoting unity among citizens. They reject the idea of a Caesar-like leader and advocate for the preservation of free republican government.
Slack expressed frustration with the current undemocratic order and called for a focus on fixing broken institutions rather than labeling them as democratic when they do not uphold democratic values.
Anton and Slack believe that those who question the legitimacy of the current system will be unfairly accused of supporting a ”Red Caesar” as a means to silence dissent.
rnrn
How do Kevin Slack and Michael Anton respond to the claims made by The Guardian that they advocate for an authoritarian leader known as the “Red Caesar”?
He Fault of Conservative Academics
In conclusion, the claim made by The Guardian that conservative academics are advocating for an authoritarian leader known as the “Red Caesar” is completely false. Both Kevin Slack and Michael Anton have vehemently denied these allegations and have emphasized their support for constitutional government and the preservation of the original Constitution. The term “Red Caesarism” was introduced by Anton as a speculative exploration of potential future scenarios resulting from poor governance, not as an endorsement or prediction of the rise of a “Red Caesar” or any form of authoritarian rule. Slack also dismissed the notion of supporting a “Red Caesar” or fascism and criticized the current political power for leading the country in dangerous directions. The Guardian and other media outlets have taken their discussion out of context and distorted it to discredit Slack and Anton. They believe that these critics are attempting to undermine them and their associations. They argue that those who fear a “Red Caesar” are actually paving the way for such a leader by undermining democratic institutions and consolidating power in the hands of the ruling elite. In response to the accusations made by The Guardian, Anton and Slack have expressed their concern about the current state of the country and the actions of the current government that undermine democratic principles. They maintain their support for constitutional government and their opposition to any form of authoritarian rule. It is essential to approach these claims with caution and critically evaluate the evidence before jumping to conclusions. It is unfair to label conservative academics as proponents of authoritarianism without substantial evidence. We must strive for intellectual honesty and integrity in analyzing and reporting on political ideologies and their proponents.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
