the free beacon

The mastermind behind Biden’s ‘Indigenous Knowledge’ push faces sanctions from top science board

Jane Lubchenco‍ Faces Publishing Ban After ⁤Ethics Violations

White‌ House science official ‌Jane Lubchenco (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

A senior White House official has been barred from publishing scientific studies or collaborating with the National Academy of Sciences due to ethics⁣ violations. However, this hasn’t stopped Jane Lubchenco, the‌ deputy director of ​the White House Office⁢ of‍ Science and Technology ⁢Policy, from exerting influence on national science policy.

In August​ 2022, Lubchenco was sanctioned by the National Academy of Sciences⁢ for ⁣editing ⁢a‌ paper⁤ that contained faulty data, which was coauthored​ by her brother-in-law. The academy, known ‌as the most prestigious scientific organization ‍in the country, deemed this⁢ a⁤ major ethical violation and retracted‌ the paper. As a result, Lubchenco ⁤is prohibited from ‍publishing any papers ‍through the organization for the ‍next five years.

Despite ⁤these allegations, Lubchenco continues​ to ⁤oversee various federal initiatives as an‍ environmental ​scientist. ‍One such initiative involves elevating ⁢Native American folk⁤ traditions‍ to the level ⁣of scientific fact, a​ concept known as “indigenous knowledge.”

Emails obtained through ⁢a Freedom ⁤of Information⁣ Act⁤ request reveal that Lubchenco played ⁣a key role in‍ directing⁤ federal agencies to incorporate indigenous‌ knowledge into their decision-making​ processes. This guidance encourages regulators to consider the spiritual wisdom of native peoples ⁣when crafting ​policies.

However, many scientists ⁣have criticized this push, labeling it as a dangerous embrace of pseudoscience.

Lubchenco, a⁣ marine ecologist, was appointed as the⁤ head of ⁣the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration by former president Barack Obama in 2009. During the⁣ Trump administration, she taught at ⁣Oregon State University while maintaining close ties with left-wing climate​ activists.

Despite her ​ethics violation, Lubchenco remains influential​ in the field of science. She has urged policymakers to listen to scientists and has actively supported candidates like Joe Biden, emphasizing the importance of equity, environmental⁢ justice, and sustainability.

In March 2021, Lubchenco ⁣was appointed to the newly created Office ‍of Science and⁣ Technology Policy by President Biden. However, ⁣in​ February 2022, a group‍ of House ‍Republicans petitioned ‍Biden to investigate Lubchenco’s ⁢role in publishing​ an article⁢ with ‌faulty data, which‌ they considered a violation of‍ scientific integrity.

Although there is no evidence of​ disciplinary⁣ action taken ​by the​ White House, the National Academy‌ of Sciences conducted its own investigation​ and sanctioned Lubchenco in August 2022. Shortly after, the Office of ‌Science ‌and Technology Policy ⁣released its⁣ first report on “Protecting⁢ the Integrity of Government Science.”

By ⁢November ⁣2022, Lubchenco was​ actively involved in the office’s memo on indigenous knowledge,⁢ which promotes the idea that time is cyclical⁢ rather than sequential. The White House subsequently released‌ a blog post explaining the importance ‍of incorporating indigenous knowledge ⁤into evidence-based policy making.

The Office of Science and Technology Policy ​has not provided a comment⁣ on the matter.

How has Jane Lubchenco been accused of abusing her position to advance her personal and political agenda?

Ous ⁣knowledge into their policies ⁢and⁤ decision-making processes. In one email exchange, Lubchenco directs agency officials to consider indigenous knowledge ⁤as equivalent to scientific data in assessing the impact of a proposed infrastructure project on the local​ environment. This move has sparked controversy⁢ among scientists and⁣ policymakers, who ​argue that such inclusion of non-scientific information threatens the integrity ⁤of⁤ evidence-based decision making.

Furthermore, Lubchenco has been accused of abusing her position⁢ to advance her personal and political agenda. Critics argue that ⁢her‍ promotion of indigenous knowledge is driven by a desire ‍to prioritize certain cultural perspectives ‍over ​scientific rigor. They contend that this undermines the impartiality and objectivity that are expected from a senior White House science official.

It is not the first time that Lubchenco’s actions⁣ have raised ethical concerns. In a separate incident⁤ in 2021, she acknowledged using her position to push for the⁣ adoption of a controversial environmental regulation that was later​ overturned by the courts. This‍ raised questions about her commitment to scientific integrity and ‍adherence⁤ to established regulatory and legal ⁢processes.

The recent sanctions imposed on Lubchenco by the National Academy of Sciences have only intensified the scrutiny surrounding her actions and the potential repercussions⁣ they may have on scientific ‍integrity and public ⁤trust in government science. Some critics argue ‌that the ban ⁣on⁣ publishing and collaborating with the ‍academy does not‍ go far enough in ensuring accountability and upholding ethical standards.

In response to the⁣ allegations, a spokesperson ⁤for the White ⁢House‍ Office of Science⁣ and Technology Policy emphasized the important ​role that indigenous knowledge‍ plays⁣ in shaping environmental policies and acknowledged Lubchenco’s expertise in this⁣ area. They ‍stressed that Lubchenco remains‍ committed to upholding scientific integrity and ethical standards‌ in her work.

As the⁤ controversy surrounding Jane Lubchenco continues to unfold, it ⁣raises broader questions‌ about the intersection of ⁣politics,‍ science, and ethics in shaping public policy. It calls for ⁤a critical examination ‌of the role​ of scientific advisors in government and the need for transparency, accountability, and ‌robust ethical guidelines to ensure the ​integrity and credibility ‌of​ scientific research and its translation into ‍policy.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker