Tennessee sues BlackRock for misleading consumers on its climate agenda
Tennessee Takes on BlackRock in Landmark Lawsuit
In a groundbreaking lawsuit filed Monday, the state of Tennessee sued BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest asset management firm, for harming current and potential Tennessee consumers via the firm’s so-called environmental, social, and governance (ESG) commitments. The suit specifically takes aim at decisions BlackRock has made “to achieve various climate-related policy goals,” which Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti says violate consumer protection laws.
The suit details how BlackRock is joined with ESG climate coalitions, like the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative and Climate Action 100+. Thanks to its alliances with these ESG entities, the suit contends, BlackRock makes key company decisions based not on what will obtain the highest profit, but on what will instead move the world closer to radical “net zero” goals.
“BlackRock has articulated two inconsistent positions: one focusing solely on money and the other focusing on environmental impact,” Skrmetti said in a statement, alleging that BlackRock is “misleading” investors and consumers. “Tennessee consumers deserve to know which of BlackRock’s statements are a true account of the company’s decision-making.”
Consolidating Power
The Tennessee lawsuit is key in the battle against the growing consolidation of wealth and power among a small group of left-wing elites with no consideration for consumers. ESG standards are powerful, rewarding or punishing companies based on how well they push leftist orthodoxy on things like skin color, the sexes, and climate alarmism. If you’ve ever wondered why Bud Light pulled its disastrous Dylan Mulvaney stunt, ESG is your answer.
“These big asset managers have unbelievable amounts of leverage over the economy,” Skrmetti told The Federalist. “BlackRock has almost $10 trillion in assets under management.” This is why BlackRock, as well as other major investment firms and big banks, can act as ESG enforcers on businesses.
As Federalist contributor Justin Haskins explained, “BlackRock has been one of the world’s biggest supporters of ESG metrics, using its power as one of the world’s largest shareholders to pressure companies to change society.”
In other words, BlackRock and other major financial entities are shaping culture and enforcing policies outside the electoral consent of regular citizens. Skrmetti described this as “shadow regulations” created by individuals who have “no accountability to the people.”
“That’s the exact opposite of what America is,” Skrmetti said. “We are a self-governing people,” where “accountability ultimately has to lie with the voters.” The Tennessee attorney general warned, “If you remove [power] from the voters, it starts this cascading catastrophe that will ultimately hurt all of us in ways that we can’t fully appreciate.”
The Consequences
According to BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, soon “everything we do” will be dictated by ESG scores. Indeed, as author Michael Rectenwald put it, ESGs act as a “Chinese-style social credit score for rating corporations. Woke planners wield the ESG Index to reward the in-group and to squeeze nonwoke players out of the market. Woke investment drives ownership and control of production away from the noncompliant. The ESG Index serves as an admission ticket for entry into the woke cartels.”
But ESGs aren’t simply an assault on people’s social values and economic freedom, they also pose a threat to people’s lives. BlackRock’s war on fossil fuels, which is mentioned in the Tennessee lawsuit, could kill an untold number of people. Fossil fuels have provided humans with things like heating and air conditioning, saving generations from life-threatening climate disasters and extreme weather. Fossil fuels, in part, helped cut climate-related disaster deaths by 99 percent compared to a century ago.
Moreover, the higher standard of living provided by fossil fuels is why the industrialized world enjoys lower poverty rates, longer life expectancies, and lower infant mortality rates than the non-industrialized world.
If BlackRock has its way, however, humanity will descend into a “net-zero” nightmare, where regular citizens are deprived of basic things like reliable transportation, electricity, heating and cooling systems, and mass food production.
BlackRock’s Deep Pockets
BlackRock has already responded to the lawsuit by denying all wrongdoing, and Skrmetti told The Federalist that he expects BlackRock to put up a formidable fight. “Blackrock is an enormous corporation with very, very deep resources,” Skrmetti said. “I have no doubt the legal team that they are assembling to defend this case will be extraordinary and aggressive and very challenging for us to deal with.”
“At the end of the day, this is a simple, simple case,” he added. “Is the company able to articulate two separate policies that contradict each other? Or can they not do that? And that’s the beauty of the consumer protection case. It’s not a complicated law. It just says you got to be honest.”
In what ways does BlackRock’s shift towards a Chinese-style social credit system threaten innovation, dissent, and market diversity
Business world and as a weapon for expelling dissenters.”
BlackRock’s push for ESG standards not only undermines consumer protection but also threatens free-market principles and individual freedom. By prioritizing leftist ideologies over profit maximization, BlackRock exposes itself as a company that values social engineering over economic growth. This disregard for consumer choice and market competition sets a dangerous precedent that should concern all Americans.
Moreover, the consolidation of power in the hands of a few left-wing elites raises serious questions about accountability and transparency. Skrmetti rightly highlights the lack of electoral consent and democratic oversight in BlackRock’s influence on business practices. Americans should be wary of unelected individuals shaping regulations and policies that affect the lives of millions.
The consequences of BlackRock’s dominance in the ESG arena extend beyond the realm of corporate decision-making. As Fink himself admitted, ESG scores will soon dictate all aspects of BlackRock’s operations. This shift towards a Chinese-style social credit system limits innovation, stifles dissent, and threatens to create a homogeneous business environment driven solely by ideological conformity.
If Tennessee’s lawsuit succeeds, it could set a precedent for reining in the unchecked power of ESG-focused asset managers like BlackRock. The case serves as a wake-up call for policymakers and consumers to scrutinize the influence and intentions of these powerful entities. It is crucial to protect consumer choice, market competition, and democratic decision-making from the overreach of ESG standards.
Ultimately, Tennessee’s lawsuit against BlackRock is not just a battle between a state and a financial giant. It is a fight for individual freedom, free markets, and the principles on which America was built. As Skrmetti aptly puts it, “If you remove power from the voters, it starts this cascading catastrophe that will ultimately hurt all of us in ways that we can’t fully appreciate.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
