Supreme Court backs pregnancy center in donor subpoena fight
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a New Jersey “crisis pregnancy center” can continue its federal challenge to a subpoena demanding its donor lists. The justices said First Choice Women’s Resource centers has shown a sufficient “present injury” to its First Amendment rights, meaning the case can proceed.
The dispute began when then-Attorney General Matthew Platkin issued a 2023 subpoena seeking donor identities, arguing it was part of an investigation into claims the center may have misled donors into thinking they were funding an abortion clinic. During oral arguments in December 2025, the Court appeared skeptical of New Jersey’s position that the subpoena would not unlawfully chill the center’s free speech-an issue the center argues is unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court handed a crisis pregnancy center a significant win on Wednesday in the anti-abortion center’s bid to quash New Jersey‘s subpoena demanding it hand over its donor lists, after the center successfully argued it was unlawfully targeted.
The justices found that First Choice Women’s Resource Centers had established a “present injury” to its First Amendment rights, allowing it to continue its case in federal court, where the pregnancy center has alleged that the subpoena unlawfully chills its First Amendment free speech rights.
Recommended Stories
The case, First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Platkin, stems from a dispute over whether First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, a pregnancy center that offers resources for expectant and new mothers, can challenge the constitutionality of the subpoena from then-New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin in federal court. Platkin argued that the subpoena was part of an investigation into whether First Choice misled donors into thinking it is an abortion clinic, something pregnancy centers do not typically do.
SUPREME COURT TO WEIGH WHETHER STATES CAN TARGET DONOR LISTS
The subpoena Platkin served First Choice in 2023 demanded, among other records, the names of most donors to the pregnancy center. The Democrat demanded the identities as part of an investigation into claims the group misled donors into thinking they were giving to an abortion clinic.
During oral arguments in December 2025, the justices appeared largely skeptical of New Jersey’s claims that the subpoena is not an unlawful chilling of First Choice’s First Amendment rights, especially regarding the state’s claims that the subpoena cannot be viewed as enough of a threat to the pregnancy center’s free speech rights to have a case in federal court.
This is a breaking story and will be updated.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
