States sue NCAA over transfer eligibility rule
OAN’s Cameron Breckenridge
4:26 PM – Friday, December 8, 2023
Several states are taking legal action against the NCAA for imposing restrictions on college athlete transfers.
A group of seven state attorneys general filed a lawsuit on Thursday, arguing that the transfer eligibility rule imposed by the NCAA is “an illegal restraint on college athletes.”
In 2021, the NCAA made an exception for first-time transfers, but attorneys claim that denying other athletes the ability to transfer without a waiting period deprives them of the opportunity to prioritize their own well-being.
“This is an antitrust parlance, a no-poach agreement among horizontal competitors, and a clear violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act,” said Dave Yost, the Ohio Attorney General.
The state attorneys are also seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the NCAA from enforcing the transfer rule.
Stay informed! Subscribe here to receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. https://www.oann.com/alerts
From a massive drop in support among the Muslim community to Biden’s re-election campaign scrambling to save face. One America’s Monica Paige breaks down the week at the Biden White House.
A unique store in Scottsboro, Alabama, called unclaimed baggage, leaves little to the imagination with their name.
The President’s son Hunter is slammed with nine new tax-related charges in a new indictment.
West Virginia and Indiana co-lead an amicus brief asking the Michigan Court Of Appeals to keep 45th President Donald Trump on the ballot in both the primary and general elections.
Amazon.com asked a federal court to dismiss a U.S. government antitrust lawsuit which accuses the company of using illegal strategies to boost profits at its online retail empire.
More than 10 million people have signed up for X in December, X CEO Linda Yaccarino said in a post on the social media platform.
Alphabet shares ended 5.3% higher on Thursday as Wall Street cheered the launch of Gemini.
Meta Platforms will add invisible watermarking to its text-to-image generation product imagine with Meta AI chatbot in the coming weeks to enhance transparency.
rnrn
What potential consequences do student-athletes face under the current transfer eligibility rule?
Ur inbox.
The lawsuit comes in response to the NCAA’s current policy that requires college athletes in most sports to sit out for a year after transferring to another school. This transfer rule has been criticized by many players, coaches, and advocates who argue that it limits the opportunities for athletes and restricts their ability to pursue their athletic and academic goals.
The attorneys general from California, Maryland, Delaware, Iowa, Illinois, New York, and Oregon are challenging the NCAA’s transfer eligibility rule, arguing that it violates antitrust laws and denies athletes their rights to freedom of movement and opportunity.
Under the current system, student-athletes who want to transfer to another school must request permission from their current school and the NCAA. Even if both parties approve, the athlete must still sit out for a year before they can compete for their new school. This waiting period can have significant consequences for the athletes, including missed playing opportunities, loss of scholarships, and delayed graduation.
The NCAA’s transfer rule has faced increasing scrutiny in recent years, especially as more and more athletes have voiced their frustrations and sought alternatives, such as the transfer portal. The transfer portal allows athletes to enter their name and contact information, indicating their desire to transfer, and schools can then contact them if they are interested in recruiting them.
While the NCAA made an exception for first-time transfers in 2021, allowing them to compete immediately without sitting out, attorneys argue that this does not go far enough. They believe that all athletes should have the ability to transfer without restrictions, giving them the freedom to choose the best situation for their future.
The state attorneys’ lawsuit seeks to highlight the anticompetitive nature of the NCAA’s transfer rule and bring attention to the harm it causes to college athletes. They hope that by challenging the rule in court, they can secure a more equitable and fair system for all student-athletes.
The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for college sports and the rights of student-athletes. If the court sides with the attorneys general and deems the transfer rule illegal, it could lead to significant changes in how transfers are regulated and provide greater freedom and opportunities for college athletes.
As the legal battle unfolds, the NCAA and its supporters argue that transfer restrictions are necessary to maintain competitive balance and prevent schools from poaching athletes from other programs. They also argue that the rule promotes academic stability and prevents constant movement of student-athletes.
Regardless of the outcome, this lawsuit brings attention to an ongoing debate about the rights and opportunities of college athletes. It raises important questions about the balance between competitive fairness and the individual rights of athletes, and how governing bodies like the NCAA should navigate these complex issues.
Overall, the legal action taken by the state attorneys general against the NCAA highlights the growing dissatisfaction with the current transfer eligibility rule in college sports. As the lawsuit progresses, it will likely spark further discussions and debates about the rights and freedoms of student-athletes, and the need for a more equitable and player-centered approach to transfers.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
