Speaker Johnson willing to modify Motion to Vacate Rule.

House Speaker Mike Johnson Open to Changing Rule Allowing Single Member ⁢Effort to Vacate Speaker’s Chair

House ⁢Speaker Mike ⁣Johnson ⁤(R-La.), who recently took charge ‌of the​ U.S. House ⁤of Representatives, has expressed his willingness⁢ to‍ modify a rule that permits a single member to initiate a motion to vacate the speaker’s chair.

A motion to ⁣vacate enables the House to remove the⁤ speaker from ​their position if ⁤it loses confidence in their ​leadership.‍ Historically, no speaker had ever ⁤been successfully‌ removed through this mechanism until October 3, ⁣when Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) brought a motion to vacate against then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).

Following the passage ⁣of the motion, McCarthy became the first person in history to be removed from the top job​ in the lower chamber by a House vote. This led to a 22-day period of ⁢paralysis as Republicans struggled to find a replacement who could garner enough support. Eventually, they settled on Johnson,⁢ who secured⁤ unanimous backing from Republicans during‌ the House floor vote.

Questions Surrounding‍ the Fate of the Motion to⁢ Vacate ⁢Rule

Despite Johnson’s appointment, concerns remain about the future of the House’s motion to vacate rule, which has undergone significant changes​ in recent years.

McCarthy’s removal was‌ partly due ⁤to a deal he made with the right ⁤wing of his caucus, allowing a single member to bring ​a motion to vacate. Reflecting ‌on the chaotic 22-day period, Johnson stated ‌that he is not afraid to⁢ raise the threshold​ for ⁤a motion⁣ to vacate from ⁢its current requirement​ of one member.

“Everyone has ​told me that that rule has to‌ change,” Johnson emphasized during an appearance on Fox News’s “Sunday ⁢Morning Futures.”⁢ He expressed his commitment to working transparently with every member to ensure a clear understanding of the rule’s modifications.

Previously, the motion to ​vacate only required the ⁤support of a single member. However, under former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the threshold⁣ was ‌significantly raised. McCarthy’s ‌candidacy forced him to lower the threshold back to one member in order to secure the necessary support.

Throughout McCarthy’s tenure, the motion to vacate ⁢loomed over ​him, leading to ⁤desperate negotiations with opponents. To address‌ the⁢ situation, McCarthy‌ brought a ⁢stopgap spending bill to the ​floor, which passed with mostly Democrat support and ⁣no ​concessions for ⁣Republicans.

Johnson‍ believes that this cannot be the norm‍ moving forward, stating, “The ​rule makes‍ it ​difficult for any Speaker to do‌ their job.” However, he emphasized that changing the rule is not his top priority. Instead, he aims to decentralize the power⁣ of ​the speaker’s office and empower committees and their respective chairs.

As Johnson takes on⁢ the ⁢role of⁢ speaker, all‌ eyes are on ‌him, as he leads a caucus⁢ that remains deeply divided⁢ after weeks of internal conflict.⁤ The House ⁤is ⁤set​ to reconvene this week‍ to address government funding, which is due to expire in mid-November.

Related Stories

• 30 Things to Know About Mike ​Johnson
  
  10/26/2023
• ‘America’s Back​ On Track’: Republican Lawmakers Praise New‌ Speaker Mike Johnson
  
  10/28/2023

What concerns⁣ are ​raised about the⁤ potential⁣ abuse of ⁤power ⁣by individual members in relation to the motion to vacate rule?

Utures.”

The concern regarding the⁣ motion ‌to vacate rule stems from the potential abuse of power by ​individual members. Allowing a single⁤ member to initiate a motion ‌to remove the speaker could lead to political gamesmanship and instability within the ​House. It ‌could become a tool for personal vendettas and power⁣ struggles, undermining the functioning of the chamber and hindering⁣ the legislative process.

Johnson recognizes the need to address these concerns and ensure the stability and effectiveness of the House. While he did not provide specific details on potential changes to the ‌rule, he expressed a willingness to raise the‌ threshold for initiating⁢ a motion to vacate. This could involve requiring ​a certain number of members to support the motion ‍before it can proceed, thereby ensuring that ⁢it‍ is‌ based⁤ on a broader consensus rather than an‍ individual’s whim.

The motion to vacate rule⁢ has been a ​subject of controversy ⁢and debate in recent years. It ​has been used sparingly throughout history but gained attention after the unsuccessful attempt to remove then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi in 2019. The rule was intended as a safety valve ⁤to hold‌ the speaker accountable ​and maintain the balance of power⁢ within the House. However, its potential for misuse​ became evident when Gaetz brought the motion⁤ against McCarthy.

Some argue that the motion to ‌vacate rule should be eliminated altogether, as it can ⁣lead to instability ‍and ‌gridlock. They believe that if a majority of members lose confidence in the speaker, they should express it ⁢through a vote of no confidence instead of relying on a single ⁤member’s motion. This would ensure a more democratic and ⁤transparent process,⁣ as it would require a⁢ broader coalition⁤ to remove a speaker.

However, others maintain that the rule serves an important purpose in holding the speaker accountable, especially in situations where a significant portion of ​the⁢ caucus has concerns about their leadership.⁤ They argue that modifying the rule, rather than eliminating it, would strike⁢ a‌ balance between ‍preventing abuse and maintaining the ability to remove⁢ an ⁤ineffective or unpopular speaker.

As ⁣Johnson assumes the role of House Speaker, he faces the challenge of navigating these diverging‍ perspectives and finding a solution that⁤ preserves the integrity of the House while ensuring its smooth functioning. It is a delicate task that requires careful‍ consideration and consultation with members ‌from both sides of the aisle.

Ultimately,​ the fate of⁤ the motion to vacate ​rule rests in​ the hands of ⁢the‍ House. Any changes or modifications will require consensus and support from ⁢the members,⁣ reflecting ‍their collective‌ understanding of the rule’s​ implications and their commitment to upholding the principles of good governance and effective ‌leadership.

Johnson’s openness to modifying the rule is a positive sign⁣ that he is ⁢committed to addressing the concerns and maintaining the stability of the House. As he ⁢works towards finding a solution that ‍balances accountability and functionality, the future of the motion to ⁢vacate rule remains uncertain.