the epoch times

Johnson defends Israel aid package despite Senate, White House criticism.

House Speaker Defends $14 Billion Israel Aid Package Amid Criticism

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Nov. 5 passionately defended the recently ⁢approved⁢ billion aid ‌package for Israel, countering criticism from the Senate and White House.

Johnson’s proposal aims to allocate $14 billion in aid to Israel, with the ⁤funding offset by⁤ a cut to​ IRS funding. This offset has faced opposition, ‌particularly‍ from Democrats.

Last week, the House approved Johnson’s⁣ proposal in a mostly party-line vote, with ​a few Republicans ⁣and Democrats breaking ranks. However, the package is expected to face significant challenges in the Senate.

Senate Majority ​Leader Rejects ⁣the Proposal

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has strongly criticized the aid‌ package, calling it ⁤”deeply flawed” and “not serious.” He has made it clear that the Senate ⁢will not ⁣take up the measure.

President Joe Biden has also expressed his stance, vowing to veto any ⁤Congress-passed package that does not include funding for Ukraine.

Despite the challenges, Johnson defended​ his proposal during an‍ interview on “Fox News Sunday.”

Responding to criticism from⁤ Senator Schumer and reports of division among Republican⁢ leaders, Johnson expressed surprise and emphasized that the proposal fulfills the requested $14.5 billion.

He ‍argued that the Senate’s opposition stems from the House’s approach of offsetting the spending with cuts instead of printing‌ new dollars or ⁣borrowing​ from another nation.

Johnson stated, “We want to pay for‍ it. What a concept!‌ We’re trying to change how Washington works.”

Regarding concerns about the deficit, Johnson dismissed the Congressional Budget Office’s claims, highlighting⁣ the irony of cutting funding to pay for new spending.

Ukraine Aid

The White House has insisted on linking Israel and Ukraine aid, a move⁤ that House Republicans‌ staunchly ⁢oppose.

Johnson,⁣ who previously voted against most Ukraine‌ assistance packages, remains firmly opposed to a dual aid package. Instead, he plans to⁤ introduce separate bills for ⁢Israel and Ukraine aid.

Republicans, including Johnson, ⁣have proposed a compromise deal that includes increased‍ funding for Ukraine in exchange for provisions and funding to enhance security at ​the ⁤U.S.–Mexico border. ⁢However, this plan has faced pushback, particularly from ​Democrats.

Johnson defended the proposal, emphasizing that it⁣ aligns with⁢ the priorities⁣ of the‍ American people and⁢ the need to secure the southern border.

He argued, “When you couple Ukraine and the border, that⁤ makes sense to people because they say⁢ if we’re going to protect Ukraine’s border … we have ⁣to take care of our⁤ own border first. And that’s what we’re saying, [these are] policy changes that are ​necessary.”

Johnson also highlighted the growing consensus in Congress about the ​importance of improving border security.

Congress will ​reconvene this week with the fate of both aid packages still uncertain.⁤ Additionally, ‌the possibility of a government shutdown looms ⁢if lawmakers fail to pass appropriations ⁤bills or a second stopgap measure by Nov. 17.

How ⁣does⁢ Johnson‍ respond to criticism from ⁤Democrats regarding supporting Israel

And disappointment. He emphasized the importance‌ of‍ the aid package for Israel and the⁣ need for bipartisan support.

Johnson argued that the $14 billion aid package ‌is crucial for‍ maintaining the ‌United States’ relationship with Israel,⁤ a‌ key ally in the Middle East. He highlighted Israel’s strategic⁣ position and the ⁣shared values and interests between the two countries.

Furthermore, Johnson defended​ the​ funding offset by emphasizing the need to ‌prioritize national security. He argued that reallocating funds from the IRS would have minimal impact on its operations, while providing essential support⁣ to Israel’s defense.

Addressing ‌criticism from Democrats,‌ Johnson acknowledged their concerns but ‌maintained ​that supporting ⁢Israel is in the best interest of the United States. He stressed the importance of standing united against shared ​threats in the region, such as Iran’s nuclear ambitions and terrorism.

Regarding Majority Leader Schumer’s rejection⁣ of the proposal, Johnson​ expressed disappointment but remained hopeful for future discussions. He called ⁢for constructive dialogue ⁢and urged both ⁣parties to⁤ put aside partisan differences in​ support of Israel.

President Joe Biden’s stance on ‌the‍ aid ⁢package⁢ was also addressed by Johnson. ⁤While understanding‍ the President’s focus on funding ⁣for Ukraine, Johnson emphasized⁢ the importance of ‌prioritizing aid‌ to Israel⁣ as well.

In⁤ conclusion, House Speaker‌ Mike Johnson passionately defended the $14 billion aid package for Israel amid criticism from the Senate and White‌ House. ⁢He stressed⁤ the significance of supporting Israel ⁣as a key ally‍ and highlighted the shared interests and values between the two countries. Johnson called for ‌bipartisan support and constructive dialogue to ​overcome the challenges ahead.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker