Senate approves $95B foreign aid bill despite opposition from majority of GOP senators
The Senate Passes $95 Billion Foreign Aid Bill, Allocating Funds for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan
The Senate made a significant move early Tuesday morning by passing a $95 billion foreign aid bill. This bill specifically designates funds for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. The vote resulted in a 70-29 victory, although more than half of Senate Republicans voted against the measure.
Allocation of Funds
The aid package includes a substantial $61 billion for Ukraine, $14 billion for Israel, $4.83 billion for U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific region, and over $9 billion for global humanitarian aid. The bill received support from nearly all Democrats and 22 Republicans.
According to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), this bill holds immense significance for national security, the security of allies, and the security of western democracy. He stated, “It’s certainly been years, perhaps decades, since the Senate has passed a bill that so greatly impacts not just our national security, not just the security of our allies, but the security of western democracy,” as reported by Reuters.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) also played a crucial role in advancing the bill. He emphasized the Senate’s understanding of America’s national security responsibilities and stated, “History settles every account. And today, on the value of American leadership and strength, history will record that the Senate did not blink,” as reported by The New York Times.
Bipartisan Support
Several Republican senators joined Democrats in passing the measure. The list includes Sens. John Boozman (R-AR), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Susan Collins (R-ME), John Cornyn (R-TX), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), John Hoeven (R-ND), John Kennedy (R-LA), McConnell (R-KY), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), James Risch (R-ID), Mitt Romney (R-UT), Mike Rounds (R-SD), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), John Thune (R-SD), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Roger Wicker (R-MS), and Todd Young (R-IN).
Opposition and Criticism
Conservative senators who prioritize addressing the border crisis and the influx of illegal immigrants into the United States opposed the bill. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) expressed his concerns during the debate, stating, “Americans are going to hold people accountable that chose to move on from border security and fund foreign nations before we took care of our own homes,” as reported on Twitter.
Sen. J.D. Vance shared a similar sentiment, stating, “This morning the America last caucus got a $61 billion aid package out of the Senate. But they paid dearly for this small win. The House won’t pass the current bill. We must fix our country before devoting more resources to Ukraine. That’s our message, and the fight goes on,” as reported on Twitter.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) criticized McConnell for supporting the aid package, stating, “Most Senate Republicans vote no. McConnell of course votes with the Democrats. He is Biden’s chief foreign policy supporter these days. That position is an island — and the gulf between it & the rest of America is only getting wider.”
Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) highlighted the changing dynamics within the Republican party, stating, “Nearly every Republican senator under the age of 55 voted NO on this America Last bill. 15 out of 17 elected since 2018 voted NO. Things are changing just not fast enough.”
Border Security Concerns
Earlier this month, an attempt was made to pair the foreign aid bill with border security measures. However, this proposal, negotiated between Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) and top Democrats, failed to gain support from conservative senators who believed it would not effectively address the issue of illegal border crossings.
House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed criticism towards the Senate’s foreign aid bill, stating that it was “silent on the most pressing issues facing our country.” He emphasized the need to secure America’s own border before allocating additional foreign aid.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
What are the concerns raised by some senators regarding the allocation of funds for foreign aid in relation to American citizens?
Of our own citizens.” Similarly, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) criticized the bill, arguing that it does not prioritize the needs of American citizens.
Furthermore, some senators believe that providing aid to foreign countries without adequate accountability measures is not in the best interest of American taxpayers. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) expressed his dissent and stated, “We don’t have the money. We’re borrowing it from China. We’re borrowing it from Japan. We’re borrowing it from Europe. It’s a disservice to the taxpayer.” He also suggested redirecting the funds to address domestic issues like infrastructure or healthcare.
Implications and Future Steps
The passage of this bill highlights the ongoing debate within the Senate regarding the allocation of funds for foreign aid. While proponents argue that foreign aid bolsters national security and strengthens alliances, opponents focus on prioritizing domestic needs and ensuring proper accountability.
As the bill moves to the House of Representatives for consideration, its fate remains uncertain. The House must weigh these arguments and make a decision that aligns with the priorities and interests of the American people.
Overall, the Senate’s passage of the $95 billion foreign aid bill sets a precedent for discussions on the appropriate allocation of funds for international assistance. It showcases bipartisan support for aiding Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan while also highlighting the divisions within the Senate on issues related to border security and domestic needs.
Ultimately, the outcome of this bill will shape international relationships, impact national security, and influence the perception of American leadership. The American people and the world eagerly await the decisions made by the House of Representatives regarding this crucial piece of legislation.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
