Secret Service ignores RFK Jr.’s plea for protection
The Secret Service Ignored Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Plea for Security, New Emails Reveal
In a shocking revelation, recently released emails from the Secret Service show that officials were ordered to disregard Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s request for security, despite an analysis of the threats against him as an independent presidential candidate.
“No response” was deemed necessary by a top official, who also stated that it should not be given.
These emails, obtained by the legal watchdog Judicial Watch, shed light on the fact that the decision to provide or deny protection lies in the hands of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and congressional leaders, rather than the Secret Service itself.
The documents reveal that the Secret Service does not have the authority to determine who qualifies for protection or initiate candidate protection independently.
According to the emails, the Secret Service did investigate the threats reported by Kennedy’s security firm, Gavin de Becker and Associates. However, the report was so extensive that it posed difficulties in downloading.
Despite this, the Secret Service produced a five-page assessment that seemingly downplayed the potential threat to Kennedy, who is the son of Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of former President John F. Kennedy, both of whom were assassinated.
Judicial Watch highlighted key sentences from the emails, including a message from the protection company Gavin de Becker Associates, which Kennedy disclosed as providing him with security. The response from Secret Service officials indicated that no action was required or warranted.
Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, expressed concern over the Biden administration’s handling of Kennedy’s security request.
“These documents confirm the bureaucratic and political runaround the Biden administration went through to ultimately deny Robert F. Kennedy Jr. the requested Secret Service protection,” Fitton stated. “The Biden administration’s refusal to provide Secret Service protection to Mr. Kennedy is dangerous and vindictive. Congress should thoroughly investigate these disturbing documents uncovered by Judicial Watch’s FOIA investigation and lawsuit.”
How does the Secret Service’s decision to ignore Kennedy’s plea for security raise questions about the agency’s impartiality and effectiveness in fulfilling its duty?
Ate in 2024. The newly uncovered emails highlight a troubling disregard for the safety and well-being of a prominent public figure who had expressed concerns about his personal security.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the son of the late Senator Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of former President John F. Kennedy, had reached out to the Secret Service last year, seeking protection as he campaigned for the presidency. Kennedy, a prominent environmental lawyer and advocate, had attracted attention for his progressive policies centered around climate change and environmental justice.
The emails, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, reveal a startling lack of response and action from the Secret Service. Despite their role in protecting potential targets of violence, officials decided against providing Kennedy with the necessary security he requested. These revelations raise serious questions about the Secret Service’s commitment to fulfilling its mandate and protecting individuals at risk.
According to the emails, Kennedy’s request for security was subjected to an analysis of threats against him as an independent presidential candidate. The analysis reportedly highlighted specific concerns, including potential threats from conspiracy theorists and anti-vaccine activists who vehemently opposed his views. However, despite acknowledging these risks, the Secret Service opted to ignore Kennedy’s plea and failed to provide him with the protection he sought.
These revelations are alarming, as they raise questions about the impartiality and effectiveness of the Secret Service in fulfilling its duty. The agency is entrusted with safeguarding the lives of not only political leaders but also prominent public figures who may be targeted due to their beliefs or advocacies. The disregard for Kennedy’s security request indicates a potential breach of that trust and undermines the public’s confidence in the agency’s ability to fulfill its responsibilities.
Furthermore, the timing of these revelations is crucial as they come at a time when public figures and political candidates face increasing threats and violence. It is disheartening to witness a security agency fail to recognize and respond to legitimate concerns expressed by individuals who are in the public eye and may therefore be vulnerable to targeted attacks. By ignoring Kennedy’s request for security, the Secret Service has potentially endangered the life and well-being of a prominent figure in American politics.
It is essential that the Secret Service conduct a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the decision to ignore Kennedy’s request. The agency must be held accountable for its actions and ensure that such negligence does not occur in the future. The safety and security of individuals expressing their political beliefs should never be compromised or dismissed.
Additionally, these revelations call for a broader discussion about the role of security agencies and the extent of their responsibilities. It is crucial to reassess and strengthen the protocols in place to evaluate and address security threats against public figures, particularly during times of political tension and polarization.
In conclusion, the release of the Secret Service emails shedding light on the agency’s dismissal of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s request for security is deeply troubling. It highlights a concerning disregard for the safety of a prominent public figure who expressed legitimate concerns about his personal security. This revelation raises questions about the integrity and commitment of the Secret Service to fulfilling its duty to protect individuals at risk. The agency must be held accountable, and steps should be taken to prevent similar occurrences in the future to ensure the safety and security of individuals in the public eye.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
